Date: 2025-07-03 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00028755
IRAN
>br>
CONFLICT ... JUNE 2025
Opinion: Iran badly miscalculated. Now it’s paying the price.
As Iran is learning, the consequences of military action are hard to predict.
Opinion: Iran badly miscalculated. Now it’s paying the price.
As Iran is learning, the consequences of military action are hard to predict.
Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, at a news conference
Sunday after the U.S. military struck three sites in Iran. (Alex Brandon/AP)
Original article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/06/22/united-states-trump-bombing-iran/
The U.S. attack on Iran is another ripple effect from Hamas’s attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. The more time that goes by, the more significant 10/7 looms. It is one of those hinge points in history — like 11/9 (the day the Berlin Wall fell in 1989) or the 9/11 terrorist attack in the United States — after which nothing will ever be the same again.
Make sense of the latest news and debates with our daily newsletter In launching its barbaric assault on Israel, the Iranian-backed Hamas wanted to draw its regional partners into a broader war that, it hoped, would lead to the destruction of the Jewish state. But instead of destroying Israel, Hamas set in motion a train of events that resulted in the destruction of Iranian power across the region. In the more than 600 days since, much of Gaza has been razed and more than 50,000 Palestinians have been killed (according to the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry). Hamas, though it still exists, is a shadow of its former self. Yahya Sinwar, the architect of 10/7, is dead, along with his brother, and most of Hamas’s commanders. June 13, 2025 The Iranian-backed Hezbollah, while it did not join in the initial assault on Israel, followed up by rocketing northern Israel for many months. Last fall, Israel struck back with an offensive against Hezbollah that began with the “exploding pagers” operation. Now, its longtime leader, Hasan Nasrallah, is also dead, along with most of its senior commanders. Its military infrastructure has been decimated and its ability to exert power in Lebanon considerably diminished. Hezbollah missiles no longer pose a significant threat to Israel. With Hezbollah essentially defeated, another Iranian client, Bashar al-Assad, was toppled by rebels in Syria late last year. Now, Syria is ruled by a Sunni government with no love lost for the Shiite mullahs of Iran. Though Iran still has powerful proxies in Yemen and Iraq, its strategy of encircling Israel with a “ring of fire” has been largely dismantled. That has allowed Israel to directly strike at Iran in a way it had always hesitated to do before. Follow Trump’s second term Follow On June 12, Israeli airstrikes decapitated Iran’s senior military leaders and destroyed its air defenses. Israel’s objective was to stop, or at least to significantly set back, Iran’s nuclear program. That objective now draws closer to realization following President Donald Trump’s momentous decision to employ U.S. B-2 Stealth bombers armed with 30,000-pound “bunker-buster” bombs and Tomahawk cruise missiles to target Iran’s three major nuclear sites: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The degree of damage inflicted by U.S. airstrikes is as yet uncertain; as Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Sunday morning, bomb damage assessment takes time. But one thing is already clear: Iran made a terrible miscalculation by dragging its feet on negotiations with, first, President Joe Biden and then Trump on a nuclear accord to replace the one Trump (unwisely) exited in 2018. Iranian negotiators, overestimating their country’s power and leverage, took a tough line by resisting U.S. demands to give up all of their enrichment capacity. Even while talking with the United States, moreover, the Iranians kept enriching uranium to near-weapons-grade levels, raising alarms in Jerusalem. They thought they could get away with it. They were wrong. Now, their major nuclear complexes — developed at vast cost over many decades — have been hit and hit hard. Yet, tempting as it is for many Israelis and Americans to engage in triumphal chest-thumping, it is a temptation best resisted. Because the lesson of 10/7 — that war is unpredictable and that conflicts which begin with victories sometimes end in defeats — applies not only to the Iranian regime and its proxies. The same lesson holds for any country launching a war, as Israel learned during its long war in Lebanon (1982-2000) and the United States in its long post-9/11 wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Trump might think that, with one big airstrike, he is ending the war with Iran, but he might be just beginning it. In his Saturday night statement announcing the attacks, he said, “Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace.” Let’s hope that is what happens, but the Iranians were not sounding conciliatory on Sunday. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi vowed to respond and said that the Trump administration understands only “the language of threat and force.” The Iranian regime rules by fear, and it will feel compelled to strike back in some fashion to avoid conveying an impression of weakness to its own populace. Even in its wounded state, Iran has plenty of options for retaliation, ranging from terrorist strikes in the West to missile attacks on U.S. bases in the Middle East to mining the Strait of Hormuz. The most worrisome possibility is that Iran still rushes to build a nuclear device. The U.S. and Israel have undoubtedly set back Iran’s nuclear program, probably by several years, but, while bombs can eliminate facilities and kill scientists, they cannot erase the nuclear know-how that the Iranian regime has accumulated over many years. Nor is it even clear that the airstrikes have eliminated the roughly 900 pounds of uranium that, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran had already enriched to near-weapons-grade quality. Iran might now feel compelled to, if it can, try to build a nuclear device — something that the U.S. intelligence community insisted it had not decided to do just a few days ago — to deter further attacks. Or, having seen how thoroughly Israeli intelligence has penetrated their power structure, the Iranians might not be eager to provoke another attack. We simply do not know how they will react — and, as the U.S. military says, the enemy always gets a vote. In initiating the latest offensive against Iran, Israeli leaders appear to be gambling that they can set in motion the overthrow of the Iranian regime. That, at least, is something Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called for. But there is no precedent for regime change from the air; more often, air attacks — whether from German bombers targeting London in 1940 or Russian drones and missiles targeting Kyiv today — cause a civilian population to rally around their leaders. Even many Iranians who hate their theocratic regime say that the attacks on Iran will not loosen its hold on the country. So the likelihood is that the United States and Israel will still have to deal with the Islamic regime for years to come. A wounded, cornered predator can still be dangerous. At this early date, the consequences of the U.S. attack on Iran — Operation Midnight Hammer — remain uncertain. All we can say for sure is that wars have unpredictable consequences and that reverberations from 10/7 will continue to reshape the Middle East for years to come. What readers are saying The comments largely criticize President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear agreement, attributing the current conflict to this action. Many commenters argue that this withdrawal destabilized the region and led to the recent military actions against Iran. There is... Show more This summary is AI-generated. AI can make mistakes and this summary is not a replacement for reading the comments. All comments 1118 By Max Boot Max Boot is a Washington Post columnist and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. A Pulitzer Prize finalist in biography, he is the author, most recently, of the New York Times bestseller 'Reagan: His Life and Legend,' which was named one of the 10 best books of 2024 by the New York Times.
Peter Burgess COMMENTARY
Peter Burgess
Opinions about the Middle East Next Opinion David Ignatius Trump’s Iran strike was clear and bold. The aftermath could be far messier. Trump’s Iran strike was clear and bold. The aftermath could be far messier. June 22, 2025 Opinion Editorial Board U.S. bombs have fallen. What comes next? U.S. bombs have fallen. What comes next? June 22, 2025 Opinion Matthew Duss and Sohrab Ahmari Trump is in danger of repeating Bush’s Middle East mistakes Trump is in danger of repeating Bush’s Middle East mistakes June 21, 2025 Opinion Marc Thiessen MAGA voters back Trump on Iran and reject isolationism MAGA voters back Trump on Iran and reject isolationism June 22, 2025 Opinion David Ignatius Trump needs creativity to resolve the Iran crisis. The two-week pause is a start. Trump needs creativity to resolve the Iran crisis. The two-week pause is a ... June 20, 2025 Opinion Fareed Zakaria Israel is succeeding but will it overreach? Israel is succeeding but will it overreach? June 20, 2025 Opinion Editorial Board Netanyahu chose this conflict. Israel should finish the job itself. Netanyahu chose this conflict. Israel should finish the job itself. June 20, 2025 Opinion Dana Milbank War with Iran? Let’s run it up the flagpole! War with Iran? Let’s run it up the flagpole! June 20, 2025 Opinion Arash Azizi I hate Khamenei’s regime. But I love Iran even more. I hate Khamenei’s regime. But I love Iran even more. June 19, 2025 Opinion Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib The first step to saving Gaza is seeing Hamas for what it is The first step to saving Gaza is seeing Hamas for what it is June 20, 2025 Opinion Jason Willick Why Israel would benefit from defeating Iran on its own Why Israel would benefit from defeating Iran on its own June 18, 2025 Opinion Marc Thiessen Israel cleared the way, but only Trump can end Iran’s nuclear program Israel cleared the way, but only Trump can end Iran’s nuclear program June 18, 2025 Opinion Max Boot The risks and benefits of bombing Fordow. Spoiler alert: It’s a close call. The risks and benefits of bombing Fordow. Spoiler alert: It’s a close call. June 18, 2025 Opinion David Ignatius Israel’s Iran mission creeps into regime change Israel’s Iran mission creeps into regime change June 16, 2025 Opinion Editorial Board Bomb Iran? Trump needs to think about what happens next. Bomb Iran? Trump needs to think about what happens next. June 16, 2025 Opinion Ali Shihabi The world has one last chance to save the two-state solution The world has one last chance to save the two-state solution June 17, 2025 Opinion Editorial Board Israel’s Iran attack succeeded. But what’s the endgame? Israel’s Iran attack succeeded. But what’s the endgame? June 13, 2025 Opinion Max Boot Israel’s attack on Iran underscores Trump’s failures as a peacemaker Israel’s attack on Iran underscores Trump’s failures as a peacemaker June 13, 2025 Opinion Natan Sharansky We’re witnessing a historic test of two assumptions about Israel We’re witnessing a historic test of two assumptions about Israel