Date: 2025-08-24 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00027927
TRUMP
ESSENTIALLY OUT-OF-TOUCH!
Was he grave, sombre, the consoler-in-chief? Are you kidding?
This is Trump. Hours after the Washington plane crash, the president’s
desire to politicise tragedy was breathtaking in its audacity
ESSENTIALLY OUT-OF-TOUCH!
Was he grave, sombre, the consoler-in-chief? Are you kidding?
This is Trump. Hours after the Washington plane crash, the president’s
desire to politicise tragedy was breathtaking in its audacity
Original article: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/30/trump-washington-dc-plane-crash
Peter Burgess COMMENTARY
Donald Trump is proving to be considerably worse than I expected as US President and the (theoretical) leader of the Free World.
It is a sad state of affairs. Though there is some surprise among Americans that Trump does not seem to be delivering what they expected, there is a huge part of the American population that still supports the man. It is anybody's guess how long this will last.
The way Trump tried to divert responsibility for the Washington plane crash back to the Biden administration is classic Trump. For me, this makes Trump look foolish, but for his followers is probably seems quite reasonable.
The idea of 'dumb and dumber' comes to mind for some reason!
I am sad that this aircraft accident has occurred. It has been common knowledge for some time ... several years ... that the US airspace was crowded and air traffic contol stretched to its limits. Addressing some of the many serious issues related to air traffic control has not been addressed ... delayed significantly because of the Covid related air traffic decline, followed by staff reductions associated with traffic decline, and then staffing shortages associated with an air trevel rebound that has been substantially bigger than anyone expected.
Currently the airline industry is stretched very thin ... and perhaps less safe than it has been in the past!
Nobody knows yet why this crash actually happened ... but it serves as a reminder that while flying in the USA is very safe by almost every metric, it is probably time to assess everything so that it remains very safe!
Peter Burgess
Hours after the Washington plane crash, the president’s desire to politicise tragedy was breathtaking in its audacity
Washington DC plane crash – latest updates
David Smith in Washington
Thu 30 Jan 2025 15.21 EST
After the Challenger space shuttle disaster, Ronald Reagan ended an Oval Office address with the consoling thought that its crew had slipped the surly bonds of earth to touch the face of God. Successors such as Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Joe Biden also shone in the crucial US presidential role of consoler-in-chief.
How would Donald Trump fare in his first test since returning to the White House? On Thursday he came to the press briefing room just 14 hours after the collision of a passenger plane and army helicopter near a Washington airport apparently left all 67 people dead.
The early signs were promising. Wearing dark blue suit, white shirt and red tie, Trump strode to the lectern and requested a moment of silence for the victims and their families. The crammed, often rambunctious briefing room was stilled and hushed. You could have heard a pin drop.
In grave, mellow tones, Trump did the things that heads of state are supposed to do, acknowledging an “hour of anguish” for the nation, paying tribute to emergency rescue workers and offering solace that the victims’s journey ended in “the warm embrace of a loving God”.
a man speaking in the white house
Trump baselessly blames DEI and Democrats for Washington DC plane crash
“We are one family and today we are all heartbroken,” he said. “We are all searching for answers.”
Did he leave it there, channeling the sombre mood, fading with dignity into the background and handing over to experts who know what they are talking about? Are you kidding? This is Trump. He went on, ominously revealing that he had “strong opinions” on the collision (never mind the facts).
With aggression creeping into his voice, Trump pivoted to an all-out attack on his Democratic predecessors and blame the accident on policies of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The norm-busting desire to politicise tragedy was breathtaking in its audacity.
Trump claimed Obama had pushed “mediocre” standards for air traffic controllers, a job that requires “superior intelligence”, but Trump had raised them during his first term. “When I left office and Biden took over, he changed them back to lower than ever before.”
Last week Trump signed an executive order restoring his standards. He explained: “We have to have our smartest people. It doesn’t matter what they look like, how they speak, who they are. It matters intellect, talent – the word talent, you have to be talented, naturally talented genius. You can’t have regular people doing that job.”
It’s almost as if you need a master race.
Trump claimed that the FAA under Obama “came out with a directive – too white” and described former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg as “a disaster” with “a good line of bullshit”, adding: “He’s run it right into the ground with his diversity.”
It was the classic argument from an administration that regards America as a pure meritocracy where systemic racism is a myth and the poor can pull themselves by their bootstraps. It must have just been a coincidence that on Thursday the message was delivered by four white heterosexual men.
Transportation secretary Sean Duffy lavished praise on the president’s “remarkable” leadership and said: “We can only accept the best and the brightest in positions of safety that impact the lives of our loved ones, our family members, and I think you make a really important point on that, Mr President. That is the motto of your presidency. The best and the brightest. The most intelligent coming into these spaces.”
Next up was Pete Hegseth, recently confirmed as defence secretary despite allegations of excessive drinking and abuse of his second wife. Hegseth vowed: “The era of DEI is gone at the defence department and we need the best and brightest.”
Duffy and Hegseth were like King Lear’s two eldest daughters trying to outdo each other in their flagrant genuflection. Then came the paragon of obsequiousness, Vice-President JD Vance, thanking Trump for his leadership and bringing a “hire-the-best-people” approach.
One reporter asked Trump if he was saying diversity hiring caused the crash and what evidence he has for that. “It just could have been,” teased the president, who has spent the first 10 days of his presidency hammering DEI in government and beyond.
Another reporter challenged that we do not yet even know the names of the 67 people killed and Trump is already blaming Democrats and DEI policies. Is he not getting ahead of the investigation? What comfort will this bring the families?
Trump rambled then snapped it was “not a very smart question”. He was pressed again on why he was able to so conclusively say DEI policies were responsible. “Because I have common sense, OK, and unfortunately, a lot of people don’t. We want brilliant people doing this. This is a major chess game at the highest level.”
And of course Trump is the chess grandmaster. It was in this same room that Trump once floated the idea of bleach as a cure for Covid-19. Just weeks ago, after a terrorist attack in New Orleans, he was quick to blame illegal immigration even though the attacker was an American citizen born in Texas.
After Thursday’s debacle, Buttigieg responded on the X social media platform: “Despicable. As families grieve, Trump should be leading, not lying … One of [Trump’s] first acts was to fire and suspend some of the key personnel who helped keep our skies safe.”
Trump, Duffy, Hegseth and Vance. The best and the brightest that America has to offer?
Why you can rely on the Guardian not to bow to Trump – or anyone
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask whether you could support the Guardian’s journalism as we begin to cover the second Trump administration.
As Trump himself observed: “The first term, everybody was fighting me. In this term, everybody wants to be my friend.”
He’s not entirely wrong. All around us, media organizations have begun to capitulate. First, two news outlets pulled election endorsements at the behest of their billionaire owners. Next, prominent reporters bent the knee at Mar-a-Lago. And then a major network – ABC News – rolled over in response to Trump’s legal challenges and agreed to a $16m million settlement in his favor.
The Guardian is clear: we have no interest in being Donald Trump’s – or any politician’s – friend. Our allegiance as independent journalists is not to those in power but to the public. Whatever happens in the coming months and years, you can rely on the Guardian never to bow down to power, nor back down from truth.
How are we able to stand firm in the face of intimidation and threats? As journalists say: follow the money. The Guardian has neither a self-interested billionaire owner nor profit-seeking corporate henchmen pressuring us to appease the rich and powerful. We are funded by our readers and owned by the Scott Trust – whose only financial obligation is to preserve our journalistic mission in perpetuity.
What’s more, we make our fearless, fiercely independent journalism free to all, with no paywall – so that everyone in the US can have access to responsible, fact-based news.
With the new administration boasting about its desire to punish journalists, and Trump and his allies already pursuing lawsuits against newspapers whose stories they don’t like, it has never been more urgent, or more perilous, to pursue fair, accurate reporting. Can you support the Guardian today?
We value whatever you can spare, but a recurring contribution makes the most impact, enabling greater investment in our most crucial, fearless journalism. As our thanks to you, we can offer you some great benefits – including seeing far fewer fundraising messages like this. We’ve made it very quick to set up, so we hope you’ll consider it. Thank you.
Trump baselessly blames DEI and Democrats for Washington DC plane crash
President scapegoats diversity and inclusion initiatives while addressing air traffic disaster that left 67 dead
Plane crash near Washington DC: what we know so far
Washington DC plane crash – latest updates
Martin Pengelly in Washington
Thu 30 Jan 2025 13.44 EST
Donald Trump used the plane crash in Washington DC to attack his political enemies, claiming Democrats were responsible for declining standards in air traffic control and that the disaster “could have been” caused by diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies at the Federal Aviation Administration.
Trump turned what might have been a sombre a press conference into a baseless rant against DEI, despite no evidence of a link with the crash at Ronald Reagan Washington National airport, which involved an American Airlines jet and a US military helicopter.
We’re committed to keeping our quality reporting open. By registering and providing us with insight into your preferences, you’re helping us to engage with you more deeply, and that allows us to keep our journalism free for all. You’ll always be able to control your own privacy settings.