image missing
Date: 2024-05-21 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00023359

Opinion: Post Elizabeth: Palace video footage demands are an early red flag

In this image released by the Buckingham Palace, the ledger stone, following the interment of the late Queen Elizabeth II, is installed at the King George VI Memorial Chapel, St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle on September 24, 2022 in Windsor, England. (Photo by Royal Collection Trust/The Dean and Canons of Windsor via Getty Images)

Final marker: Buckingham Palace released a photo Sept. 24 of the ledger stone marking where Queen Elizabeth II has been buried, with her husband, within St. George’s Chapel on the Windsor Castle grounds. The castle reopened for public tours on Thursday. For those wondering why the queen had a lead-lined coffin: The practice dates to an incident involving the corpse of William the Conquerer in 1087 — that is, in pre-embalming days. A practical consideration of lead-lined coffins? Soldiers act as royal pallbearers in an effort to ensure the extra hundreds of pounds are carried without incident.
Original article:
Peter Burgess COMMENTARY
I don't know in any detail what rules and regulations apply to photographs and other recorded materal about the British Royal Family, but this article from theWashington Journal in the USA suggests that the rules are in fact quite draconian. I don't know whether this is a result of old history or whether, maybe it has something to do with the appalling experience the Royal Family had during the saga around Princess Diana and her eventual death in Paris and amazing funeral. I simply don't know.

This article suggests that the rules and regulations may be more onerous than is normal in places like the United States where the First Amendment makes it possible for the media to have considerable freedom to publish most anything ... but then, there is no institution like the British Monarchy in the United States.

The United Kingdom also has a very active 'tabloid' press which goes to great lengths to publish sensational material ... not matter how lurid ... and most of the time they do not seem to pay a price. I don't know whether this is because what they are doing is actually legal, or it is merely profitable, and any fines are simply a cost of doing business.

I expect a lot of the wonderful imagery that was seen by probably as many as 2 billion people since the Queen's passing will disappear ... but hopefully a lot will remain accessible.

We shall see.
Peter Burgess

Opinion Post Elizabeth: Palace video footage demands are an early red flag

By Autumn Brewington ... Associate opinions editor

Published October 1, 2022 at 9:32 a.m. EDT ... Updated October 2, 2022 at 4:05 a.m. EDT
The caption and permitted use information that was distributed with this Sept. 24, 2022, image: WINDSOR, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 24: (NEWS EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NO SALES. NO USE AFTER OCTOBER 2 WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM ROYAL COMMUNICATIONS) EDITORIAL USE ONLY. The photograph shall not be used without permission from Royal Communications. There shall be no commercial use whatsoever of the photograph (including any use in merchandising, advertising or any other non-editorial use). The photograph must not be digitally enhanced, manipulated or modified in any manner or form when published. The photograph is for free use until October 2, 2022. Thereafter the photograph is available only via Royal Collection Trust.
Pageantry and spectacle are part of the British crown’s DNA. But the idea that footage of recent events honoring Queen Elizabeth II is not in the public domain might be the most ancient thing about the monarchy.

British broadcasters gave Buckingham Palace veto power over use of footage from the queen’s funeral, the Guardian newspaper reported last week. Although the unedited broadcast remains online temporarily — through platforms such as BBC iPlayer — what happens to the material in a few weeks is unclear. “Royal staff sent messages to the BBC, ITV News and Sky News during the event with the timestamps of footage they wished to exclude from future news broadcasts and social media clips,” the Guardian reported. Five video clips removed from circulation included members of the royal family.

Then came a bigger palace demand: that broadcasters “produce a 60-minute compilation of clips they would like to keep from ceremonial events held across the 10 days of mourning for the Queen. The royal household will then consider whether to veto any proposed inclusions,” the Guardian reported Sunday.

“Once the process is complete, the vast majority of other footage from ceremonial events will then be taken out of circulation,” media editor Jim Waterson wrote. “Any news outlets wishing to use unapproved pieces of footage would have to apply to the royal family on a case-by-case basis, even for material that has already been broadcast to tens of millions of people.”

Broadcasting the funeral and procession of the queen’s coffin from London to Windsor was such a massive undertaking that the BBC worked with ITV and Sky News. Some 28 million people in Britain watched the broadcast, along with more than 11 million in the United States.

As Newsweek noted, the location of some televised events are ultimately under royal control, which could have shaped permissions for filming. But the issues here are larger than respectful coverage of a family in mourning and whether footage is replayed of, say, a grandson-in-law of the queen seen checking his watch.

A critical question is who controls the historical record of public events, especially when footage of those events has already been broadcast. By dictating what video can no longer circulate, the palace might hope to quash unflattering moments such as the new king’s frustration with an inkpot when he signed documents related to his accession. Photos of the stone marking the final resting place of Queen Elizabeth II — seen at the top of this page — circulated this week with explicit instructions that they may be published until Oct. 2, after which point royal permission must be requested.

One of the challenges before the new king is how best to showcase the monarchy’s relevance today. It’s hard to think of a less 21st-century approach than a hereditary monarchy dictating what clips of public proceedings are ever seen again.

In honor of free speech on this side of the Atlantic, here’s Post video of one of those pen moments that went viral. (NOT POSTED) Britain's King Charles III appeared to be frustrated by a leaking pen during a visit to Northern Ireland's Hillsborough Castle on Sept. 13. (Video: Reuters)

King Charles III frustrated with pen at signing ceremony

In other royal news

Majestic monogram

Envelopes franked with the new cypher of King Charles III are pictured after being printed in London on Sept. 27. (Yui Mok/Pool/AFP/Getty Images)

The cypher of the new king was unveiled this week, with Charles III being represented by an intertwined C and R, with a smaller-size III set within the R, and a crown above the letters. The letters will be seen on state documents and public objects such as mailboxes. It draws on Latin, with a slight difference for kings and queens. Elizabeth II’s cypher was EIIR, which stood for Elizabeth II Regina. In Latin, regina means queen. Charles’s CIIIR stands for Charles III Rex, as rex means king in Latin.

Royal Duties

Royal duty ... the famous red 'despatch box'

Wales watch: Although the titles Prince and Princess of Wales might be new, the couple possibly better known as Prince William and Kate Middleton were in familiar territory on Tuesday when they visited a few places in Wales. One stop was Anglesey, where they lived as newlyweds. Last week, the couple were seen in Windsor, where they thanked volunteers and staff who helped organize the public committal service for the queen. Talking about the tributes to his grandmother, William said, “There are certain moments that catch you out. You are prepared for all but certain moments catch you out,” according to the Daily Mail.

Prince William in a crowd

In Canada, interest in the monarchy remains mostly an elite thing, writes Post contributing columnist J.J. McCullough.

In Bermuda, Britain’s oldest overseas territory, reactions to the queen’s death varied. “Talk of independence here has long ebbed and flowed,” reports Amanda Coletta. About 73 percent of voters rejected a break with the monarchy in a 1995 referendum.

SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.