HOME | SN-BRIEFS |
SYSTEM OVERVIEW |
EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT |
PROGRESS PERFORMANCE |
PROBLEMS POSSIBILITIES |
STATE CAPITALS |
FLOW ACTIVITIES |
FLOW ACTORS |
PETER BURGESS |
SiteNav | SitNav (0) | SitNav (1) | SitNav (2) | SitNav (3) | SitNav (4) | SitNav (5) | SitNav (6) | SitNav (7) | SitNav (8) |
Date: 2024-05-18 Page is: DBtxt001.php txt00024713 |
MILITARY HARDWARE
THE US F-16 FIGHTER JET MORE THAN JUST INCREDIBLE HARDWARE F-16_Fighting_Falcon.jpg Original article: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/5/19/2170261/-Quick-Explainer-Why-the-F16-might-make-a-difference? Peter Burgess COMMENTARY Peter Burgess | ||
Quick Explainer: Why the F16 might make a difference
RO37
Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)
Friday May 19, 2023 · 3:27 PM EDT
Recommend 289 Share Tweet224 Comments 224 New
RSS
PUBLISHED TO
RO37
Kossack Air Force
TAGS
F-16
Recommended
Russia
Ukraine
War
QuickExplainer
Share this article
Two pieces of very welcome news broke this morning from the G7 Summit in Japan.
The US now backs, and will materially support, F-16 training for Ukrainian pilots and crews set to start very shortly.
The US will not block allies from exporting the F-16 to Ukraine.
Taken together with the prior news that the UK and the Netherlands had begun putting together a coalition to purchase F-16s for Ukraine, this is almost a definitive indication that Ukraine will be getting F-16 fighters. Possibly as soon as late September, if leaked US intelligence reports assessing that Ukrainian pilots and crews could be ready to operate the F-16 in four months prove to be correct.
In his most recent Ukraine Update, Kos expressed his doubts about whether the extremely expensive F-16 could be worth it for Ukraine in a war that has been fought with minimal air power influence thus far.
I have the utmost respect for Kos’ analysis and expertise; but, on the matter of the F-16’s utility, I disagree.
For a long time, I was in the “Ukraine doesn’t need F-16s” camp, but especially after doing some research on how Russian air defenses and Ukrainian weapon systems interact for my article on how the Ukrainian Air Force might go about taking down the Kerch Bridge, I have come around to be firmly in the “pro-F-16 camp.” And I have a convert’s zealotry.
The reason the F-16 is needed by Ukraine boils down to one weapon: the AIM-120 AMRAAM. The only weapon that can effectively counter the Russian Mig-31 Foxhound.
AIM-120 AMRAAM
The AIM-120 AMRAAM is a radar-based beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile. it has an engagement range of 160km+ (its precise range is classified) and uses a 2-stage radar homing ability to achieve radar locks at extreme ranges.
The AMRAAM far outclasses the Ukrainian Air Force’s R-73 air-to-air missile, that only has an engagement range of around 40km.
The AMRAAM uses a 2-stage radar locking process. it first requires a radar lock on the target on firing, which can come from the aircraft’s radar, or via datalink with an AWACS surveillance plane. Upon firing the missile, the missile engages its radar tracking mid-flight. So long as the target remained “in the basket” (within the missile’s radar’s visual cone) the missile will begin radar tracking the target for the rest of the strike.
There were suggestions that the US provide AMRAAMs to Ukraine, but the problem was the first part of that 2-stage process. Ukrainian Mig-29s were not designed to engage targets 160km away, thus their radars aren’t designed to obtain radar locks at such ranges, nor are the Mig-29s designed to obtain radar lock data from surveillance planes.
This might mean the AMRAAM could only be fired at targets at the maximum radar lock range of the Mig-29, meaning it might only have a range slightly beyond what it already is capable of engaging. The Mig-29 could only unlock a fraction of the combat ability of the AMRAAM.
If the UK/Netherlands F-16 coalition also can provide the Ukrainian Air Force with an AWACS like the E-3 Sentry, that would truly unlock the F-16’s combat ability. The E-3 Sentry can obtain radar tracking data at 400+km and transmit that data to F-16s, allowing it to stay hundreds of kilometers behind friendly lines while providing radar data to F-16s even if they are flying low to the ground with limited radar visibility themselves.
So a mission might go like this: F-16s will be flying CAP (combat air patrol) within 60-70 km of the front at low altitudes to avoid radar detection. The section of F-16s would be armed with AMRAAMs. An E-3 sentry would coordinate their movements while flying about 300km behind the front lines, giving it the ability to detect targets 100km behind Russian lines, but avoiding entering into S-400 long-range SAM battery ranges.
If a high-altitude fighter enters into the combat environment (within E-3 Sentry detection range) even far behind enemy lines, the F-16s receive data-linked targeting data and can line up and fire AMRAAMs. Flying low, the F-16s will be difficult to detect on radar, and can strike stealthily because of their low altitude—this would help to prevent Russian fighters from flying high-altitude CAP behind friendly lines.
Who is doing that kind of mission? The Mig-31 Foxhound.
Russian_Air_Force_MiG-31_inflight_Pichugin.jpg
| The text being discussed is available at | https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/5/19/2170261/-Quick-Explainer-Why-the-F16-might-make-a-difference? and |
SITE COUNT< Blog Counters Reset to zero January 20, 2015 | TrueValueMetrics (TVM) is an Open Source / Open Knowledge initiative. It has been funded by family and friends. TVM is a 'big idea' that has the potential to be a game changer. The goal is for it to remain an open access initiative. |
WE WANT TO MAINTAIN AN OPEN KNOWLEDGE MODEL | A MODEST DONATION WILL HELP MAKE THAT HAPPEN | |
The information on this website may only be used for socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and limited low profit purposes
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. |