image missing
HOME SN-BRIEFS SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
EFFECTIVE
MANAGEMENT
PROGRESS
PERFORMANCE
PROBLEMS
POSSIBILITIES
STATE
CAPITALS
FLOW
ACTIVITIES
FLOW
ACTORS
PETER
BURGESS
SiteNav SitNav (0) SitNav (1) SitNav (2) SitNav (3) SitNav (4) SitNav (5) SitNav (6) SitNav (7) SitNav (8)
Date: 2024-05-15 Page is: DBtxt001.php txt00023121
ENERGY SECTOR
COAL

Asia’s energy transition: a tough balancing act ... Continued economic growth means that Asia will be the fastest-growing region for electricity consumption at least for the next ten-years


Coal mine

Original article: https://www.eiu.com/n/asias-energy-transition-a-tough-balancing-act/
and
Article introduction: https://pages.eiu.com/index.php/email/emailWebview?md_id=39261
Peter Burgess COMMENTARY
Why is 'economic growth' the goal of economic analysis and policy? I suppose it is because there is an assumption that quality of life in society has a high correlation with economic performance, but what is the basis for this conclusion? ... What do the data show? What are the facts?

It is pretty clear that quality of life improves for most people when they receive more income and more wealth.

It is also pretty clear that quality of life does not improve very much if at all as income and wealth grows from a lot to huge.

The exact shape of the relationship between the amount of income and wealth and quality of life is somewhat fuzzy because people are different and the socio-enviro-economic setting is different as well.

It is however somewhat apparent that an incremental increase in the income and wealth of people with a small amount of these will get a bigger improvement in quality of life than the loss of this amount of income and wealth for those with high income and wealth.

In other words, economic growth produces less and less improvement in quality of life the higher the inequality. uring the past 40 years, there has been a marked increase in inequality in many rich countries round the world ... and perhaps especially in the United States ... as well as an increase in inequality between the nations of the world.

This ought to be an unacceptable outcome and the subject of policy reform, but it is not ... or does not appear to be. My impression is that intellectual rigor in the world of economic academia is absent. Rather data a reality have become subservient to the mathematical models that are very elegant but essentially wrong.

Using this line of thought, it is apparent that the use of coal to make steam to drive machinery to do work (transport / production) has been vital to the improvement in quality of life for a lot of people. The policy framework has been less than
Peter Burgess
Kicking Asia's coal habit

From Simon Baptist ... chief economist Economist Intelligence Unit

Whether the world can avoid dangerous levels of climate change is, to a large extent, dependent upon what happens in Asia's emerging markets. Not only are Asian countries heavily represented in the list of the largest emitters (according to the UN Environment Programme, in 2018 China was the largest emitter, India third, Japan fifth and Indonesia seventh), but the emerging markets also have emissions that are growing strongly, while those of developed markets are flat or declining. Pakistan now emits more than the UK or France, and Thailand is only just behind them.

Developed markets do have more responsibility for historical emissions, and their per-head emissions are also usually—although not always—higher. However, if the emissions trajectory of Asia's big emerging markets doesn't change rapidly, the world has little chance of avoiding a significant risk of dangerous climate change. Whether this happens boils down to, in large part, the region's use of coal. Our latest forecasts for electricity generation in Asia are that coal use will continue to increase over the next decade, even as it declines as a share of generation. The gas shortage bought on by the war in Ukraine, and less co‑operation between the US and China across all sorts of policy areas, will make global climate goals even harder to achieve.

Find out more below.

Simon Baptist ... Twitter: @baptist_simon
Chief economist EIU Asia’s energy transition: a tough balancing act

Continued economic growth means that Asia will be the fastest-growing region for electricity consumption over EIU’s ten-year forecast period.

Wed, 07th Sep 2022



Asia is also the region that relies most heavily on coal for its power generation, and its reliance is increasing as a result of high global energy prices. Decarbonisation will be a major challenge. Asia is and will continue to be the world’s biggest market for renewable energy investment, with the lion’s share going to China, India, Japan and South Korea. We expect renewables to increase their share in power generation in the region over the next ten years. Wind energy will receive the most investment, but solar energy will get more capacity additions until 2031, when wind power capacity will accelerate. Many governments in the region are now looking at nuclear energy as a way to become less reliant on imported energy, but it will not help with the short-term energy crunch. Asia’s energy transition and decarbonisation strategies are determined by two factors: Asia is forecast to be the region with the fastest growth in electricity consumption over our ten-year forecast period (2022-31); and it is the most reliant region on coal for its power generation. The combination of these two factors makes it challenging for governments to decarbonise their power sector while satisfying increasing demand for electricity, and without compromising energy security. This dilemma explains why, despite being the world’s biggest market for renewable energy investment, Asia’s dependency on coal is far from waning. China, India and Indonesia, among other countries in the region, are still approving and building new coal-fired power plants. Furthermore, governments’ bets on coal have only increased since Russia invaded Ukraine earlier this year, intensifying an already acute global crunch in gas supplies. Still, we expect renewables to increase their share in power generation over the next ten years. In China, the share of energy from non-hydro renewables in total generated electricity will rise from 15% currently to about 26% in 2031, while in India this share will grow from 11% to 21%. In Japan and South Korea, renewables will also grow strongly, from 15% to 23% and from 7.5% to 19.5% respectively. We expect that these four countries will receive the bulk of investment into renewable energy in the region over the next ten years. The main destination by far will be China, where we forecast that almost 700 GW of non-hydro renewable capacity will be installed between 2022 and 2031. Installed capacity of non-hydro renewables in India will surge by about 200 GW, Japan by 54 GW and South Korea by 36 GW. Even though most of the investment (in US$ terms) will be channelled into wind energy projects, solar will have more MW of installed capacity, as it is cheaper per MW. In China, India, Japan and South Korea combined, we expect 577 GW of new solar installed capacity and 408 GW of wind. However, beyond 2031, wind energy will probably account for most of the MWs of installed capacity, as the technology will become more cost competitive. Offshore wind in particular is well suited for many of the densely populated countries in the region, especially Japan, South Korea and some parts of China. Yet given the rapid growth in demand for power, this will not imply a retreat from fossil fuels. Over the same ten-year period, we forecast that installed capacity of fossil fuel-fired power generation will grow by 120 GW in China, 26.5 GW in India and about 3 GW in South Korea. Only in Japan will net growth be almost zero, owing to that country’s slow economic growth forecast, its continued reliance on nuclear power and the expansion in renewables. Will Asia lead nuclear energy’s revival? The role of nuclear energy as a cheap, reliable and safe source of power has been dwindling over the past few years. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster in 2011 raised alarms over nuclear safety. A series of over-budgeted and delayed projects, especially in Western countries, have eroded the image of nuclear power as a cheap source of energy. Finally, ongoing problems with the French nuclear fleet–where corrosion and other issues have shut or compromised many reactors, pushing electricity prices to record highs–cast doubt on the reliability of nuclear energy. Despite these drawbacks, many governments in Asia are now looking at nuclear energy as a way to bolster energy security and become less reliant on imported energy as the war in Ukraine causes turmoil in global energy markets. In Japan, where only ten of the 50 domestic nuclear reactors that were shut down after the Fukushima Daiichi disaster have restarted, there has recently been a marked shift in sentiment towards nuclear power. Japan’s prime minister, Fumio Kishida, has voiced strong support for increased use of nuclear power, while a recent opinion poll showed that–for the first time since 2011–a majority of Japan’s public was in favour of nuclear reactor restarts. Japan currently has 23 commercially operable but offline nuclear reactors, which have a combined installed power-generation capacity of 21.7 GW. In South Korea, the new conservative government led by Yoon Suk-yeol seeks to reverse its predecessor’s nuclear phase-out plan and increase the share of nuclear power in the country’s electricity mix to 30% or more by 2030, from 27% in 2021. At the same time China and India, which have never had nuclear phase-out plans, are looking to build more reactors. China plans to expand its nuclear capacity from 50 GW in 2021 to 70 GW in 2025, while we forecast that it will reach about 104 GW by 2031, generating about 7.1% of China’s total electricity by 2031, up from 4.8% today. This expansion will make China the global powerhouse of nuclear energy. In India, ten reactors are currently at various stages of construction and will increase local installed capacity by nearly 8 GW, from 6.9 GW currently. In addition, the government has sanctioned the construction of ten 700‑MW indigenously designed reactors by 2031. It has also approved in principle plans to build 28 reactors, potentially boosting India’s installed nuclear capacity by up to 31.9 GW. We do not expect that all these projects will be delivered on time, and forecast that India’s nuclear energy capacity will reach 14.3 GW by 2031. With many countries in the region having net-zero targets for 2050-70, it is evident that governments are eyeing nuclear energy as a way to phase out coal consumption without compromising their energy security. However, nuclear energy is unlikely to be helpful in pulling down energy prices in the short term given the time needed to develop nuclear projects. Governments will therefore continue relying on fossil fuels in the short term, while raising capacity for renewables and nuclear. The analysis and forecasts featured in this piece can be found in EIU Viewpoint, our new country analysis solution. EIU Viewpoint provides unmatched global insights covering the political and economic outlook for nearly 200 countries, helping organisations identify prospective opportunities and potential risks. Wed, 07th Sep 2022 Article tags EconomyEnergyAsiaCountry Analysis



The text being discussed is available at
https://www.eiu.com/n/asias-energy-transition-a-tough-balancing-act/
and
SITE COUNT<
Amazing and shiny stats
Blog Counters Reset to zero January 20, 2015
TrueValueMetrics (TVM) is an Open Source / Open Knowledge initiative. It has been funded by family and friends. TVM is a 'big idea' that has the potential to be a game changer. The goal is for it to remain an open access initiative.
WE WANT TO MAINTAIN AN OPEN KNOWLEDGE MODEL
A MODEST DONATION WILL HELP MAKE THAT HAPPEN
The information on this website may only be used for socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and limited low profit purposes
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved.