TrueValueMetrics ... Impact Accounting for the 21st Century

Date: 2026-03-03 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00029390

CANADA SAAB GRIPPEN PLUS RR POWER ... Fighter Aircraft Did Canada Make the Right Choice with Its New Fighter Jets? PLAY YOUTUBE VIDEO Original article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov4VXsuVlSg
Did Canada Make the Right Choice with Its New Fighter Jets? Fighter Aircraft 326 subscribers Dec 27, 2025 UNITED STATES ✈️🇨🇦 Did Canada Make the Right Choice with Its New Fighter Jets? Canada’s fighter jet decision is one of the most consequential military choices the country has made in decades — and not everyone agrees it was the right one. From Arctic defense to NATO interoperability, this decision carries serious strategic, political, and operational implications. In this video, we break down: ⭐️ What Canada gains — and what it may have given up ⭐️ Why Canada urgently needed a new fighter aircraft ⭐️ Comparisons with other potential options ⭐️ How this decision impacts NATO, NORAD, and future air power 👇 What’s your take? Right choice — or a missed opportunity? 🔔 Subscribe for in-depth military aviation analysis, fighter jet history, and global defense insights. Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976: This video is made for educational, informational, and documentary purposes. Fair use is permitted for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. #Canada #FighterJets #MilitaryAviation #DefenseAnalysis #NATO #AirForce #AviationHistory Peter Burgess COMMENTARY Peter Burgess Transcript 0:00 41, just stay with me. They went to 36 10 for takeoff runway 35 left. Could Canada's new fighter jet deal with Sweden's Grieen future of its air defense? For years, Canada relied on foreign technology, approvals, and partnerships. That was King Carl Gustaf at Rita Hall this morning emphasizing the partnership between Canada and Sweden, limiting control over its own military systems. Now, the country is taking a bold step toward full independence, building jets on home soil, and gaining authority over upgrades, software, and even potential exports. This move challenges long-standing norms in Western defense, and has caught the attention of experts around the world. It could reshape how Canada trains pilots, develops its aerospace industry, and strengthens its role in international alliances. Keep watching as we reveal why this decision could be 1:00 one of the most important in Canada's defense history. For many years, Canada's defense strategy followed a cautious pattern. decisions were shaped by global alliances and by reliance on technology designed and built outside the country. Most discussions focused on what was allowed, what was available and what partners were willing to approve. That approach has now changed. The focus is no longer on asking for approval. It is about full technological independence. This marks a turning point that will affect Canada's economy, its defense structure, and how the country sees its own role in the world for years ahead. This period will be remembered as the moment Canada went beyond statements and made a decisive move. The quiet construction of a new fighter jet manufacturing facility on Canadian soil has altered the balance of air power in North America. More importantly, it places Canada in the role of a builder and developer, not just a buyer. The facility is expected to support a wider 2:00 aerospace network and has triggered one of the most unexpected yet widely supported changes in Canada's defense partnerships. At the center of this shift is Sweden's SA. For decades, SAR has stood as a serious alternative to US dominance in Western air power. Now, the company has made a move that defense experts are already calling the smartest military partnership Canada has entered into since the Second World War. For Canadians, this is not simply a commercial agreement. It reflects a long-standing goal. Control over national air defense, domestic industry, and future technology. What is happening now was not widely expected by the global defense community, especially in the United States. But it addresses a need Canada has faced for a long time. For months, speculation suggested that Canada was reconsidering its fighter jet plans. The country had spent years managing political pressure, balancing US influence, meeting NATO requirements, and operating within a defense industry heavily shaped by American systems. That 3:00 uncertainty is now gone. Canada has chosen a clear and locally grounded path. The decision to create a national fighter production hub supported by SA's established supply networks and its independent defense model goes far beyond replacing aging aircraft. It sends a clear geopolitical message. Canada is stepping away from full reliance on foreign military hardware and moving toward a system where it controls its own defense technology. This shift allows the country to protect its territory and meet international obligations using systems it can manage, update and sustain on its own terms. The partnership with SA sits at the center of this change. It directly challenges decades of US dominance in Western defense manufacturing. To understand why this matters, it helps to look at how the fighter jet market has evolved. The F-35 was once promoted as the standard fifth generation aircraft for NATO allies. Over time, however, criticism has grown. Rising costs, complex 4:02 maintenance requirements, and recurring software issues have raised concerns for many operators. During this period, Sweden's grip followed a different path. It gained attention as a practical option for countries that value control over long-term dependency agreements. Canada watched these developments closely and reached an important conclusion. If the goal is real autonomy, the ability to repair, upgrade, and modify aircraft without constant external approval, then the Gripen offers something few others do. It provides long-term operational control. This understanding shared across political and military leadership set the stage for the decision that followed. SAR did not approach Canada with a standard sales offer. Instead, it presented terms that US defense suppliers do not provide. These included full domestic assembly, complete technology transfer, and full Canadian authority over the aircraft's entire service life. That authority covers all major areas. software access, mission 5:02 systems, weapons integration, and even future export options if Canada chooses to pursue them. In today's defense industry, this level of control is rare. Many NATO members remain dependent on US approval and support to maintain or update their aircraft fleets. The SAR agreement allows Canada to avoid that situation entirely. Defense analysts agree that this was SAR's strongest advantage. By offering full independence, it delivered something the US system is not structured to allow. This is where long-standing assumptions in Washington were challenged. The prevailing belief was that no major Western ally, especially a G7 nation like Canada, would step outside the US controlled defense framework. Canada has now done exactly that. SAR's proposal matched Ottawa's long-term objective to build a stable domestic defense economy that does not rely on a single foreign supplers's decisions by committing not only to aircraft delivery but also to a complete fighter production system based 6:00 in Canada. SAR gave the government a direct path to self-sufficiency behind closed doors. Defense insiders have confirmed that this move has caused dissatisfaction within the Pentagon. The reason is straightforward. The partnership weakens one of the US defense establishment's strongest advantages, control over supply chains. When Canada builds its own fighter jets on home soil using an open architecture approach, it cuts off long-standing dependency chains. It no longer has to rely on complex maintenance hubs in the United States. It no longer depends on software updates that must be approved by the US government. Most importantly, it no longer needs American approval to add Canadian-made missiles or advanced sensor systems. In military terms, this means operational freedom. In political terms, it translates directly into national authority. For the first time in decades, Canada will have the technical independence to say, 'This is our aircraft. These are our upgrades. These are decisions made in Ottawa.' The 7:01 scale of this independence is significant. The planned factory backed by major domestic investment and advanced foreign technology is expected to include some of the most capable manufacturing systems in the world. These include advanced composite production lines, next generation avionics assembly, complex systems integration units, and dedicated engine integration sections. This work will be carried out through close cooperation between experienced SA technicians and Canada's own aerospace engineers supported by a renewed network of local high-tech suppliers. This project is not just about putting up another industrial facility. It marks the start of a new defense manufacturing identity for Canada. Major cities with established aerospace foundations, including Montreal's industrial base, Toronto's technology sector, and Winnipeg's specialized expertise, are all positioned to benefit from the economic and technical spillover. At the center 8:00 of the facility will be the final assembly line, which serves as the operational core of the project. This modern system is built for accuracy and efficiency. Each aircraft will move through defined stages that include assembly, testing, calibration, and real environment simulation, ending with a fully Canadian-built rollout. SAB's plan for Canada closely follows the model it used successfully in Brazil. In that case, the Gripen program did more than deliver aircraft. It created thousands of skilled jobs, strengthened local engineering and research programs, and reshaped Brazil's defense industry in a short period of time. Canada enters this partnership with greater financial resources, a stronger industrial base, and a larger aerospace workforce. As a result, the long-term gains are expected to be even greater. This factory is not limited to meeting current military needs. It will also train and develop future engineers, specialized software developers, and defense planners who 9:00 will guide Canada's military and technical direction for decades. This transfer of technical knowledge and the development of a domestic workforce has drawn quiet concern inside the Pentagon. The United States has traditionally kept strict control over the intellectual property behind its fighter programs. That control forces allies to depend on American facilities for major upgrades and maintenance. SAB's commitment to giving Canada full access to source code, system architecture, and customization rights changes that balance. It removes a key point of influence that has existed for decades. Forced technical dependence. This is not a standard procurement deal. It represents a major shift in how defense manufacturing power is distributed globally. For the first time, a G7 country has openly chosen to move away from near total reliance on the US defense system and partner instead with a Scandinavian firm that offers full national control. The effects of this decision will not stop at North America. 10:01 They extend into NATO across Europe and into the Indoacific region. When a G7 nation places technological independence ahead of long-standing dependency, it sends a clear message. Other countries, especially those facing rising costs and limits tied to older defense arrangements, are pushed to reconsider their own strategies. This is the Canadian approach taking shape. It is practical, technically advanced, and focused on self-sufficiency. By selecting SAR's Griffin instead of continuing full reliance on the F-35, Canada has opened a new path based on control and long-term capability. That decision also gives other nations the political space to consider similar moves. Europe already has strong confidence in SA's open architecture philosophy which emphasizes access and customization rather than locked systems. Brazil adopted this approach years ago and successfully folded the Griffin program into its national industry leading to renewed growth in 11:00 its aerospace sector. Even India, a country whose defense ties with the United States have often been complicated by American export limits and technology controls, is now seriously re-examining the full proposal offered by Sweden. At the same time, NATO members such as the Czech Republic and Hungary have for years quietly spoken highly of the Grieen's flexibility in operations and its lower overall costs. Senior planners and decision makers inside the Pentagon are fully aware of what this trend means. They understand that if more nations, especially strong allies with large budgets and global influence, start following Canada's example, the United States risks losing far more than defense contracts. What is truly at stake is influence. For decades, Washington has held the ability to shape alliance training, steer aircraft choices, limit mission use, and control sensitive data sharing across Western militaries. That leverage weakens the 12:00 moment countries gain the freedom to operate independently. Canada's new level of freedom sends a clear message. Strategic choices belong in national capitals, not abroad. There is also another part of this partnership that matters deeply to Canada's sense of capability and self-reliance. SAR's agreement gives Canada a direct path into future fighter development rather than leaving it as a passive customer. The race to shape the next era of air combat is already moving fast. Programs like Europe's FCAS, Britain's Tempest, and America's NGA are defining what comes next. Until now, Canada has largely been kept on the outside of these major efforts. That changes with this factory. Canada is no longer positioned only as a buyer waiting for finished products. It becomes an active participant in building and improving the next generation of air combat systems. Backed by SAR's engineering experience and open development approach, Canada enters a space that was previously limited to only the largest 13:00 military powers. This shift significantly strengthens the country's technical capabilities and its role within collective defense. It also explains why officials in Washington are paying close attention. For decades, the United States has led and controlled much of the Western air power structure. SARB's move together with Ottawa's support challenges that long-standing structure. Instead of depending on one dominant supplier with closed systems, a new balance begins to form. Air power development becomes shared across multiple nations rather than controlled from a single center. In this environment, countries can work together more freely, build advanced systems at home, and maintain full authority over their own technology and security networks. From a military operations point of view, Canada's decision is smart and practical. From a long-term security perspective, it marks a major shift. From Washington's traditional viewpoint, it is a disruption, one that was neither expected nor stopped. 14:00 Canada's defense overhaul is not theoretical or distant. It is happening now. A country once known for delays and caution in major defense choices has taken firm ownership of its future. Canada is building a strong aerospace base at home designed to serve its own interests for decades to come. This factory is not just a physical structure. It reflects innovation and independence. Most importantly, it stands as a clear commitment that Canada will no longer need outside permission to upgrade, deploy or protect its own airspace. When the first Canadian-built Grieen leaves the production line, designed, assembled, and secured under Canadian control, the message will be unmistakable. SAR did more than secure a deal. It changed how modern defense partnerships work. This goes far beyond a routine partnership or a standard purchase deal. It is a clear example of long-term strategic planning. And for the first time in many years, Canada, not long established Pentagon policy, is the side gaining the strongest position. 15:00 This is a moment Canadians should take seriously. Years from now, when analysts and historians study how global air power shifted, they will point to one clear decision and one specific factory. They will say this was when Canada made a lasting change to how defense power is built and controlled. As Canada moves further into a period of military and technological independence, other nations are paying attention. There is growing awareness that something lasting has changed. SAB's carefully structured partnership achieved what many believed was politically and practically impossible. It transferred full control of key defense technology to Canada while also navigating around one of the most established defense systems in the world. This marks the start of a new chapter for Canada in defense and technology. It is not just about buying protection. It is about producing it domestically. It is not only about guarding borders. It is about building long-term economic stability alongside national security. This decision affects 16:01 every Canadian. It strengthens job quality, advances technical skill across industries, and improves Canada's standing with global partners. The investments in Montreal, Toronto, and Winnipeg form the economic base of this shift. High-skll aerospace jobs are being created, helping keep Canadian engineers, designers, and researchers working at home on projects that matter. The transfer of technology lifts Canadian universities and research centers into a higher level of applied research. It supports future innovation beyond the Griffin program. Canada's ability to integrate domestically built weapons and sensors without outside approval means faster readiness and a defense setup designed specifically for Canada's geography, including Arctic operations. This level of independence is one of the most valuable legacies we can pass on. It means that when Canada takes a position internationally, it does so with its own technical strength behind it. Not just trust in allies. It places 17:01 Canada not only as a dependable partner, but as a serious contributor to advanced defense development. This is a time to acknowledge the judgment shown by leaders who chose long-term national control over short-term convenience. Sometimes the most Canadian choice is to design, build, and maintain worldclass systems at home. There is still work ahead, but the base is now in place. The factory is taking shape. The technology transfer is active. Canada's future air capability is now controlled from within Canada. Building on this momentum, the next phase of Canada's defense direction will focus on turning capability into consistency. Creating a factory and transferring technology are only the first steps. The real measure of success will be how effectively Canada sustains, evolves, and protects this capability over time. Long-term planning will matter more than announcements, and steady execution will determine whether this independence delivers lasting value. One immediate 18:01 outcome will be deeper coordination between military planners, industry leaders, and academic institutions. Canada's defense needs are unique, shaped by vast geography, extreme climates, and long coastlines. With full control over aircraft design and systems, those realities can now be addressed directly rather than adapted as afterthoughts. Cold weather performance, Arctic basing, long range patrol requirements, and rapid response across remote regions can be built into upgrades from the start. This also reshapes how Canada trains its pilots and ground crews. Training programs will no longer be limited by external rules or restricted simulators. Canadian instructors can develop scenarios based on real national defense needs using systems they fully understand and control. Maintenance crews will gain hands-on experience at every level, from basic servicing to advanced system updates, creating a depth of knowledge that has been missing for decades. The industrial impact will extend well 19:00 beyond aerospace. Advanced manufacturing techniques developed for fighter production often find use in civilian sectors. Composite materials, precision machining, sensor integration, and secure software development all support growth in automotive, energy, space, and telecommunications industries. This cross-industry movement strengthens Canada's broader economy while reducing reliance on imported high-tech components. There is also a clear benefit for national decision-making. When defense systems are owned and managed domestically, political leaders are not forced to weigh security choices against foreign approval timelines. Canada can respond faster to crisis, participate in international missions with greater confidence, and set its own rules on deployment and upgrades. This flexibility supports both defense readiness and diplomatic credibility. Over time, Canada's role within alliances will also evolve. Rather than contributing primarily through manpower or funding, Canada can offer technology, 20:01 manufacturing capacity, and system integration experience. This shifts the country from a supporting role to a contributing one, strengthening its voice in joint planning and cooperation.

SITE COUNT