image missing
Date: 2026-03-07 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00029260
CANADA
THE RR EJ230 POWERED GRIPEN FIGHTER JET

NavyCast: Rolls Royce EJ230 Shocks the Pentagon,
Canada’s Gripen Deal Just Changed Everything!


Original article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Gf_lW45ezc
🇨🇦 Rolls Royce EJ230 Shocks the Pentagon, Canada’s Gripen Deal Just Changed Everything!

NavyCast

1.38K subscribers

Dec 7, 2025

HOA KỲ

#gripen #militaryanalysis #norad

Dive into the biggest strategic defense debate in Canada right now! Nobody anticipated that a single engine upgrade could fundamentally rewrite the rules of Canadian air power and challenge decades of traditional alignment. This exclusive military analysis breaks down exactly why the potential choice of the Gripen fighter, powered by the independent Rolls-Royce EJ230 engine, is being hailed as Canada’s Declaration of Air Sovereignty.

We analyze how the Gripen offers a unique combination of high performance, dramatically lower life-cycle costs, and the operational resilience necessary to dominate the challenging Arctic frontier—a capability far less dependent on the complex external logistics systems common in centralized platforms. This isn't just about procuring new jets; it’s about securing true national autonomy.

Discover the powerful psychological shift underway in Ottawa and how the Gripen could trigger a cascade effect among NATO and Pacific allies seeking greater operational freedom. We discuss the engine's modular design, extreme cold reliability, and the ability for Canada to maintain, modify, and upgrade the platform entirely at home.

If you value deep, independent military analysis and believe Canada deserves control over its own critical defense infrastructure, hit the Like button and Subscribe for more geopolitical deep-dives. Don't miss out on this crucial conversation about our future skies! #gripen #militaryanalysis #norad #canadiansovereignty #ArcticDefence

How this was made
Altered or synthetic content
Peter Burgess COMMENTARY



Peter Burgess
Transcript
  • 0:00
  • When we look back on the foundational
  • decisions that secured Canada's
  • long-term sovereignty in the 21st
  • century, the potential shift in our air
  • power posture, a shift largely focused
  • on a singular brilliant piece of
  • engineering might well be seen as a
  • defining moment. It's a development that
  • on the surface may seem technical, yet
  • its geopolitical resonance touches the
  • very core of what it means to be
  • Canadian, independent, resilient, and
  • master of our own vast domain. Say, for
  • example, we considered the Rolls-Royce
  • EJ 230. For years, one might recall,
  • this engine was generally regarded
  • within certain circles as a strong,
  • reliable propulsion system, perhaps even
  • an interesting European experiment. But
  • few likely anticipated its profound
  • capacity to challenge the conventional
  • wisdom surrounding North American air
  • dominance. Yet, that is precisely the
  • possibility now before us. In a manner

  • 1:00
  • that may have surprised seasoned
  • observers from Ottawa to NATO
  • headquarters, this European designed
  • power plant has become a crucial focal
  • point in the conversation about Canada's
  • next generation fighter fleet. And this
  • discussion isn't merely about choosing
  • an engine for a new jet. It's about
  • choosing a pathway to strategic
  • autonomy. The reason is simple. It is
  • not because the United States itself
  • would utilize this engine, but because
  • the path Canada might choose the Saab
  • Grippon E powered by the EJ230
  • could fundamentally alter the balance of
  • power across the Arctic within NORAD and
  • certainly within the global market for
  • higherformance military aircraft. This
  • single strategic choice carries the
  • potential to redefine our operational
  • and political calculus for decades to
  • come. The EJ230,
  • as it stands, doesn't just promise to
  • revitalize a proven airframe like the
  • Grippen. It offers Canada something
  • unique and strategically priceless that
  • the previous paradigms could not fully

  • 2:02
  • deliver. Consider the confluence of
  • factors it presents. A fighter jet
  • platform with genuinely raw impressive
  • performance metrics coupled with a far
  • more manageable life cycle cost,
  • unparalleled strategic independence, and
  • an engine technology advanced enough and
  • crucially independent enough to
  • challenge the long-standing monopoly on
  • propulsion technology that has defined
  • the global aerospace market. Canada's
  • grip and consideration wasn't initially
  • intended to cause international waves.
  • But if realized with the EJ230 at its
  • heart, the ripple effect on geopolitical
  • strategy would become an unavoidable
  • reality. For a generation, we've lived
  • under an implicit assumption that the
  • hierarchy of global fighter jet power
  • was fundamentally settled. Loheed
  • Martin, for example, has certainly
  • defined much of the modern market
  • landscape with major American engine
  • manufacturers like Pratt and Whitney and
  • GE serving as the indispensable power

  • 3:02
  • sources for the world's most critical
  • aircraft. This control was not simply a
  • matter of economics. It was a
  • sophisticated instrument of strategy.
  • The implication was clear. If a nation
  • flew aircraft with American components,
  • America naturally retained a significant
  • degree of influence. If a nation relied
  • on American engines, America inherently
  • possessed a certain leverage in that
  • relationship. And if a nation's
  • long-term operational readiness depended
  • entirely on the American supply chain
  • for parts and future upgrades, that
  • dependency offered external hands the
  • ability to subtly or overtly shape their
  • operational decisions. This is precisely
  • where the EJ230
  • as a concept and a reality shifts the
  • entire dynamic. It is a powerful
  • contemporary engine technology from
  • Rolls-Royce, a system capable of

  • 4:00
  • powering 21st century fighters. What
  • makes it a gamecher for Canada is its
  • technical profile combined with its
  • geopolitical freedom. We're talking
  • about high thrust performance, the
  • potential for sustained super cruise
  • capability, flying supersonic without
  • relying on fuel guzzling afterburners, a
  • truly modular maintenance architecture,
  • and crucially for our vast northern
  • responsibilities,
  • extreme cold weather reliability. This
  • is all achieved without the geopolitical
  • chains or contractual dependencies often
  • associated with deeply integrated US
  • military systems. For Canada, a nation
  • committed to true air power sovereignty.
  • This represents not a mere technological
  • upgrade, but a true national
  • breakthrough. This quest for
  • independence is foundational to the
  • platform itself. The Grippen, regardless
  • of the engine, was conceived by Sweden
  • for survival in a complex geopolitical
  • environment. It was designed

  • 5:00
  • specifically to operate autonomously, to
  • launch from dispersed assets like frozen
  • public highways, to be maintained and
  • repaired by smaller ground crews using
  • minimal specialized tooling, and to
  • sustain combat operations even if
  • traditional supply lines were challenged
  • or interrupted. This design philosophy
  • is intrinsically appealing to the
  • Canadian context. Rolls-Royce engineered
  • the EJ 230 to seamlessly align with this
  • philosophy. Contrast this with other
  • high-performance engines, which often
  • mandate enormous dedicated
  • infrastructure, climate controlled
  • facilities, and large teams of
  • specialized contractors for routine
  • maintenance. The EJ230,
  • by contrast, is engineered around a
  • concept of modular maintenance. its key
  • components, say for example a section of
  • the turbine or compressor, can be
  • quickly and efficiently swapped out in
  • the field. This capability allows ground
  • crews to maintain high operational tempo
  • even in harsh conditions without
  • necessitating the grounding of an entire

  • 6:01
  • squadron. For Canada, the essential
  • custodian of the immense Arctic region,
  • a landmass that for context is larger
  • than all of Europe combined, this
  • resilience is not a luxury. It is a
  • strategic necessity. The Arctic
  • environment is notoriously unforgiving
  • of complexity. It demands absolute
  • simplicity, rocksolid reliability, and
  • built-in resilience against temperatures
  • where certain types of metal can become
  • brittle and complex electronic systems
  • can fail without specialized climate
  • control. The EJ 230 through its design
  • and operational profile is purported to
  • thrive in these exact conditions. This
  • is the definition of a Canadian fit.
  • However, the strategic resonance extends
  • beyond Arctic resilience. Perhaps the
  • most compelling factor, one that might
  • prompt the deepest contemplation lies in
  • the pure performance numbers. Analysts
  • have observed that the EJ230 may be

  • 7:00
  • delivering higher thrust and faster
  • response times than projections made
  • even a decade ago. This boost when
  • integrated into the lightweight, highly
  • aerodynamic Grippin E, appears to push
  • the platform into a performance envelope
  • that was largely unanticipated.
  • While the F-35 is without question a
  • monumental achievement of engineering, a
  • technological masterpiece representing
  • the pinnacle of sensor fusion and
  • stealth. It is also defined by its
  • characteristics. heavy, inherently
  • expensive per flight hour, highly
  • intensive in terms of specialized
  • maintenance, and utterly reliant on a
  • vast intricate support network managed
  • by a centralized external system. The
  • Grippin E, leveraging the power and
  • efficiency of the EJ230,
  • offers a different path. It may for
  • instance possess a thrusttoe ratio that
  • approaches the upper tier of modern
  • fighters allowing for rapid

  • 8:00
  • acceleration, the ability to sustain
  • high G maneuvers and most importantly
  • for our vast distances, astonishing fuel
  • efficiency. This specific balance of raw
  • power and operational efficiency is a
  • combination that presents a truly unique
  • proposition in the current market. one
  • that offers maximum flexibility without
  • the extraordinary long-term overhead.
  • And that in an analytical sense is why
  • this potential choice is so significant
  • for the future of Western air power. The
  • Grippen, once potentially viewed as a
  • budget fighter alternative, may now
  • legitimately be seen as a sophisticated,
  • versatile rival that demands serious
  • consideration on its own merits. For
  • Canadians, the potential shift away from
  • traditional alignment towards the
  • Grippen came as a surprise to many. For
  • decades, the political and military
  • gravity of Ottawa consistently leaned
  • toward American hardware, historical
  • political pressures, the critical
  • requirements of NORAD, and deep-seated

  • 9:00
  • defense traditions ensured a strong
  • alignment with US recommendations. Yet
  • behind the scenes, a quiet professional
  • assessment within Canadian defense
  • circles began to highlight a potential
  • discomfort. While the F-35 is
  • technically advanced, its inherent
  • logistical, technological, and strategic
  • framework places Canada in a position of
  • unyielding dependency. Consider the
  • implications. Every significant platform
  • upgrade must, as a matter of policy, be
  • approved externally. Every new weapon
  • system integrated must pass through
  • external oversight. Even the critical
  • mission data, the digital lifeblood of
  • the aircraft, is controlled and
  • processed by servers residing outside
  • Canadian jurisdiction. A nation like
  • Canada with one of the world's largest
  • and most geographically vulnerable
  • airspaces simply cannot afford
  • restrictions on its sovereignty,
  • especially in the evolving context of
  • the Arctic frontier. The Grippin E
  • coupled with the EJ230

  • 10:02
  • offered a clear and compelling solution.
  • It presented a pathway that for the
  • first time in memory promised the
  • ability to maintain the aircraft at
  • home, upgrade the aircraft at home,
  • control the critical operational data
  • and software at home and fly it anywhere
  • within our harsh expansive environment
  • without the need for external political
  • permission. This possibility, this road
  • to complete air power independence is
  • what makes the potential Canadian
  • decision a declaration of strategic
  • maturity. Historically, one might
  • speculate that Washington simply assumed
  • Canada would follow the traditional
  • path, acquies to the F-35 program, and
  • remain an integrated, dependent part of
  • a system designed to guarantee American
  • influence. But Canada's demonstrated
  • shift toward evaluating the EJ230
  • powered Grippen thoroughly represents a
  • direct challenge to this long-standing
  • model. If Canada were to proceed with
  • the EJ230 powered Grippen, it would

  • 11:02
  • broadcast an unmistakable message
  • globally that fielding a top tier
  • fighter does not require reliance on a
  • single nation's propulsion technology.
  • It demonstrates that nations can manage
  • their own battlefield data and crucially
  • that nations can modify and evolve their
  • own aircraft without requiring external
  • geopolitical permission. The true shock
  • in Washington in an analytical sense is
  • not about the engine itself, but about
  • the profound possibility that the
  • traditional monopoly on high-end fighter
  • technology might be genuinely challenged
  • by a platform that is proving to be
  • cheaper, more strategically flexible,
  • more sovereign, and arguably more
  • versatile for Canada's unique needs than
  • previously acknowledged. The EJ230 also
  • directly addresses one of the most
  • historically common arguments against
  • non US fighter platforms, the idea that
  • European fighters lack sufficient future
  • proofing. On the contrary, the EJ230 is

  • 12:00
  • demonstrably built around a concept of
  • growth potential. It is designed to
  • support substantial increases in thrust,
  • adapt smoothly to emerging fuel blends,
  • and integrate future hybrid electric
  • components down the road. While some
  • systems may lock nations into a
  • predefined fixed upgrade path managed
  • centrally, the EJ230
  • by its inherent design actively invites
  • domestic innovation. If Canada, for
  • instance, decides to integrate
  • domestically developed technologies,
  • specialized drones, Canadian missiles,
  • or even classified systems unique to our
  • NORAD requirements, the independent
  • nature of the Grippen EJ230 architecture
  • permits it. If Canada seeks to build a
  • fully sovereign domestic maintenance and
  • industrial ecosystem for its air force,
  • the path is clear. If Canada needs to
  • adapt the Grippin for specialized,
  • unique Arctic surveillance missions, it
  • has the operational and technological

  • 13:00
  • freedom to do so. This is sovereignty
  • realized in its purest, most powerful
  • technological form, a fact that
  • resonates deeply with strategic planners
  • everywhere. The Grippin's fundamental
  • architecture is already optimized for
  • maximum autonomy, and the addition of
  • the EJ230 elevates it into something far
  • more formidable, a genuinely complete
  • sovereign national air power ecosystem.
  • Canada would not merely be acquiring new
  • jets. It would be purchasing the
  • inalienable ability to maintain, modify,
  • and evolve its own combat capability
  • across decades of service without
  • seeking mandatory external approval.
  • This is the strategic resilience that
  • Sweden built for itself. And it is
  • precisely the strategic capability that
  • Canada has needed to fully secure its
  • long-term northern interests. The core
  • understanding is that once Canada
  • secures full operational control over
  • its engine technology, a degree of

  • 14:01
  • control, the current F-35 framework
  • simply does not permit the nation steps
  • out of any potential shadow of
  • dependency. This strategic reality
  • explains why officials may quietly
  • express concerns. The EJ230 choice could
  • influence far more than just a single
  • fighter deal. It holds the potential to
  • influence Canada's entire long-term
  • defense posture. The Pentagon, for
  • instance, fully understands that the
  • most impressive performance figures on
  • paper mean little without logistical
  • reality. The F-35 is immensely powerful,
  • but it relies on enormous climate
  • controlled hangers, continuous
  • diagnostic monitoring, and a complex
  • contractor-driven labyrinth of support
  • systems. The EJ230
  • Griffin combination requires none of
  • that complex fixed infrastructure. This
  • difference terrifies strategists who
  • rely on predictability. The emergence of
  • a fully dispersed highway capable cold

  • 15:01
  • weather fighter that can be serviced by
  • a small resilient team and launched from
  • improvised Arctic strips say presents a
  • model that the most advanced
  • conventional air forces cannot easily
  • replicate. Even with billions invested
  • in next generation systems, the Grippen,
  • reinforced by the EJ230,
  • successfully revives an older, highly
  • effective philosophy of air power,
  • decentralization,
  • survivability through dispersion, and
  • resilience built on independence. It
  • stands as the practical opposite of the
  • centralized highcost model. And for a
  • country with Canada's unique geographic
  • and strategic challenges, it represents
  • a perfect fit. The possibility of
  • Canada's shift is now being analyzed
  • behind closed doors as a potential
  • cascade trigger across Europe and the
  • Pacific. Smaller and midsize nations,
  • those who cannot afford the F-35s
  • demanding long-term sustainment costs,
  • or those who simply refuse foreign
  • control over their essential sovereign

  • 16:00
  • software, may now look to Sweden's
  • platform as the demonstrably smarter
  • long-term strategic choice. The EJ230
  • provides them with the final necessary
  • piece of confidence. a proven worldclass
  • engine, low fuel burn, high reliability
  • and critically minimal political
  • baggage. This formula say poses a
  • significant constructive challenge to
  • American monopolies. But perhaps the
  • most profound impact of this entire
  • conversation is psychological. For a
  • generation, the F-35 was marketed not
  • just as an aircraft, but as the only
  • future, the inevitable technologically
  • superior path for all Western allies.
  • Any other choice was often portrayed as
  • being outdated or technologically
  • inferior. The EJ230 powered Grippen,
  • however, powerfully and constructively
  • proves that narrative to be at best
  • incomplete. It shows that Europe and its
  • partners can produce engine and platform

  • 17:01
  • technology that is fully competitive
  • with US systems. It shows that fighter
  • jets do not necessarily require trillion
  • dollar support networks to be
  • strategically deadly and effective. It
  • shows fundamentally that autonomy
  • matters more today than ever before. And
  • it demonstrates that Canada, a nation
  • sometimes treated as a predictable,
  • compliant buyer, is entirely capable of
  • making a sovereign, forwardthinking
  • defense decision that fundamentally
  • rewrites regional expectations. In the
  • end, Canada's deep interest in the EJ230
  • powered Grippen is much more than a
  • procedural procurement curiosity.
  • It is perhaps a strategic declaration. A
  • declaration that Canada refuses to trade
  • its long-term independence for
  • short-term convenience. That it will not
  • surrender national sovereignty for
  • technology that comes wrapped in
  • fundamental non-negotiable restrictions.
  • And most importantly, that it will not

  • 18:01
  • allow its most valuable and vulnerable
  • frontier, the Arctic, to depend on
  • complex external systems it cannot fully
  • maintain, modify, and control itself.
  • The EJ230
  • provides the technological key to
  • freedom. The Grippen offers the
  • flexibility and together they give
  • Canada something that is strategically
  • priceless. Complete national confidence.
  • Washington, analysts suggest, is
  • surprised because it never factored in
  • the possibility of Canada prioritizing
  • absolute independence over long-standing
  • strategic alignment. But with the
  • independent power of the EJ230
  • now fully in the picture, that choice
  • makes more strategic sense than ever
  • before, the world is changing. Air power
  • is changing. And Canada, choosing a path
  • of sovereign resilience, is changing the
  • game. Building upon the strategic shift
  • identified in our initial analysis, we

  • 19:00
  • move now to the tangible benefits that
  • secure Canada's place as a sovereign
  • Arctic power benefits rooted not merely
  • in technology but in a philosophy of
  • self-reliance. The conversation around
  • the EJ230 powered Grippen is
  • fundamentally one about futureproofing
  • and operational control. Say for
  • example, we look deeper at the engine's
  • design philosophy. One of the
  • long-standing traditional arguments
  • levied against non US fighter platforms
  • was the assertion that they lacked
  • adequate long-term growth potential or
  • adaptability. The EJ230, however,
  • actively counters this historical
  • criticism. It is demonstrabably built
  • around a concept of continuous evolution
  • designed specifically to support
  • substantial increases in thrust
  • capacity, adapt seamlessly to emerging
  • fuel blends, and integrate future hybrid
  • electric components down the road. This
  • forward-looking architecture means that
  • while some competing platforms lock

  • 20:00
  • nations into a fixed, centrally managed
  • upgrade path, the Grippen EJ230
  • framework actively invites domestic
  • innovation and customization, placing
  • the power of technological development
  • squarely back in Canadian hands. The
  • freedom to innovate is a strategic asset
  • in itself. If Canada, for instance,
  • decides it wishes to integrate homegrown
  • technologies such as specialized
  • surveillance drones, unique missile
  • systems, or proprietary Canadian sensors
  • tailored for our NORAD requirements. The
  • independent nature of the Grippen EJ230
  • architecture permits it without
  • requiring layers of complex external
  • authorization. If Canada seeks to build
  • a fully sovereign domestic maintenance
  • and industrial ecosystem for its air
  • force, retaining full control over
  • intellectual property and highly
  • specialized servicing, the path is
  • clear. If Canada needs to adapt the
  • Grippin for specialized unique Arctic
  • surveillance missions that only we can
  • define, the technological freedom to do

  • 21:01
  • so is inherent in the design. This is
  • sovereignty realized in its purest, most
  • powerful technological form. A fact that
  • resonates deeply with strategic planners
  • who understand the critical value of
  • self-determination in long-term defense
  • planning. The Griffin's fundamental
  • architecture is already optimized for
  • maximum autonomy. And the addition of
  • the EJ230
  • elevates it into something far more
  • formidable, a genuinely complete
  • sovereign national air power ecosystem.
  • Canada would not merely be acquiring new
  • jets. It would be purchasing the
  • inalienable ability to maintain, modify,
  • and evolve its own high-end combat
  • capability across decades of service
  • without seeking mandatory external
  • approval for fundamental changes. This
  • is the strategic resilience that Sweden
  • built for itself, and it is precisely
  • the kind of strategic capability that
  • Canada has needed to fully secure its
  • long-term northern interests. This leads

  • 22:02
  • us directly to the concept of logistical
  • reality, a metric the Canadian military
  • understands better than most due to the
  • unique demands of our geography. The
  • analytical comparison here is striking.
  • The F-35,
  • while immensely powerful, relies heavily
  • on complex centralized infrastructure,
  • enormous climate controlled hangers,
  • continuous diagnostic monitoring, and a
  • complex contractor-driven labyrinth of
  • support systems like Alice Odin. The
  • EJ230
  • Grippin combination requires none of
  • that complex fixed infrastructure to
  • achieve full operational readiness. This
  • difference say fundamentally challenges
  • the conventional wisdom about high-end
  • air power deployment. The emergence of a
  • fully dispersed highway capable cold
  • weather fighter that can be serviced by
  • a small resilient team and launched from
  • improvised Arctic strips presents a
  • model that even the most advanced

  • 23:00
  • conventional air forces cannot easily
  • replicate. For Canada, which is
  • committed to protecting its vast and
  • often inaccessible northern perimeter,
  • this distributed resilient model is not
  • just an option. It is a strategic
  • imperative. Even with billions invested
  • in next generation systems globally, the
  • Grippen reinforced by the EJ230
  • successfully revives an older highly
  • effective philosophy of air power,
  • decentralization,
  • survivability through dispersion, and
  • resilience built on independence. It
  • stands as the practical opposite of the
  • centralized high-cost model. And for a
  • country with Canada's unique geographic
  • and strategic challenges, it represents
  • a perfect fit. The possibility of
  • Canada's strategic shift is now being
  • analyzed behind closed doors as a
  • potential cascade trigger across Europe
  • and the Pacific. Smaller and midsize
  • nations, those who cannot afford the
  • F-35's demanding long-term sustainment

  • 24:01
  • costs, or those who simply refuse to
  • accept foreign control over their
  • essential sovereign software and data
  • may now look to Sweden's platform as the
  • demonstrably smarter long-term strategic
  • choice. The EJ230 provides them with the
  • final necessary piece of confidence. A
  • proven worldclass engine, low fuel burn,
  • high reliability, and critically minimal
  • political baggage. This formula say
  • poses a significant
  • constructive challenge to traditional
  • aerospace monopolies. But perhaps the
  • most profound impact of this entire
  • conversation is psychological. For a
  • generation, the dominant narrative
  • suggested that the F-35 was not just an
  • aircraft, but the only future, the
  • inevitable technologically superior path
  • for all Western allies. Any other choice
  • was often portrayed as being outdated or
  • technologically inferior. The EJ230

  • 25:00
  • powered Gripen, however, powerfully and
  • constructively proves that narrative to
  • be at best incomplete. It shows that
  • Europe and its partners can produce
  • engine and platform technology that is
  • fully competitive with US systems. It
  • shows that fighter jets do not
  • necessarily require trillion dollar
  • support networks to be strategically
  • deadly and effective. It shows
  • fundamentally that autonomy matters more
  • today than ever before. And it
  • demonstrates that Canada, a nation
  • sometimes treated as a predictable,
  • compliant buyer, is entirely capable of
  • making a sovereign, forwardthinking
  • defense decision that fundamentally
  • rewrites regional expectations. In the
  • end, Canada's deep interest in the EJ230
  • powered Grippen is much more than a
  • procedural procurement curiosity. It is
  • perhaps a strategic declaration, a
  • declaration that Canada refuses to trade
  • its long-term independence for
  • short-term convenience. That it will not
  • surrender national sovereignty for

  • 26:01
  • technology that comes wrapped in
  • fundamental non-negotiable restriction.
  • and most importantly that it will not
  • allow its most valuable and vulnerable
  • frontier, the Arctic, to depend on
  • complex external systems it cannot fully
  • maintain, modify and control itself. The
  • EJ230
  • provides the technological key to
  • freedom. The Grippen offers the
  • flexibility and together they give
  • Canada something that is strategically
  • priceless. Complete national confidence.
  • Washington, analysts suggest, is
  • surprised because it never factored in
  • the possibility of Canada prioritizing
  • absolute independence over long-standing
  • strategic alignment. But with the
  • independent power of the EJ230 now fully
  • in the picture, that choice makes more
  • strategic sense than ever before. The
  • world is changing, air power is
  • changing, and Canada, choosing a path of
  • sovereign resilience, is changing the
  • game. This pivotal discussion on

  • 27:01
  • Canada's strategic future should not end
  • here. We invite you to join this
  • essential national dialogue. If this
  • deep analysis of the EJ230, the Grippen,
  • and the quest for true Canadian
  • sovereignty resonated with you, please
  • hit the like button and subscribe to our
  • channel for more exclusive insights into
  • global defense shifts and Canadian
  • resilience. Your support helps us bring
  • forward these critical forwardthinking
  • discussions. We genuinely want to hear
  • your perspective on this defining
  • moment. For your thoughts, consider
  • these questions. First, how does this
  • commitment to independence redefine
  • Canada's role within NORAD? Second,
  • which specific aspect of the EJ230's
  • cold weather performance offers the
  • greatest advantage to our Arctic
  • communities? And finally, what sovereign
  • technological capabilities should Canada
  • develop next to maintain this strategic
  • edge? Let us know below. Thank you for
  • watching and we wish you a thoughtful,
  • insightful week ahead.


SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.