image missing
Date: 2025-11-19 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00029177
COMMENTARY
HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

This Week In Politics, A Big-Picture Look at Where We Are Right Now


Original article:
This Week In Politics, A Big-Picture Look at Where We Are Right Now | Explainer

Heather Cox Richardson

647K subscribers ... 503,439 views ... 19K likes

Oct 28, 2025 ... From Politics Chat, October 28, 2025

Join us live on Tuesday and Thursday at 6 pm Maine time.

Get full, free access to Letters from an American here: https://heathercoxrichardson.substack...

You can also find me:
  • Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/hcrichardson...
  • Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/heathercoxr...
  • Facebook: / heathercoxrichardson
Resources:
  • https://redwine.blue/
  • https://www.commoncause.org/take-action/
  • https://www.congress.gov/members/find...
    • 00:00 – We’re in a “funny” place right now
    • 00:44 – November 1st SNAP benefits will not go out
    • 09:43 – At an unprecedented moment with this shutdown
    • 13:21 – Trump is not okay
    • 15:38 – Who’s calling the shots while Trump is away?
    • 19:19 – Defense Department, strikes without evidence
    • 23:08 – Pattern of Republicans messing with the upcoming vote next week
    • 26:14 – How did we get from the Gilded Age to the Progressive Era?
    • 29:10 – Where we are and what we can do
    • 31:26 – Keep up national pressure on the Epstein files
    • 34:29 – Register to vote, push back against misinformation, keep the joy
    How this content was made
    Auto-dubbed
    Audio tracks for some languages were automatically generated. Learn more
    Peter Burgess COMMENTARY



    Peter Burgess
    Transcript
    • 0:00
    • We’re in a “funny” place right now
    • Let me jump into some of the stuff you asked about here and some of the stuff you didn't ask about because we're in this really funny place and I don't mean
    • funny. Haha. Of course. We're in a funny place in the country right now where it certainly feels
    • and and I'm going to unpack that. But it feels as if things are falling apart. Like everything seems to be falling
    • apart right now from the the um military planes that are falling into the ocean
    • to uh SNAP benefits that aren't going to go out to health care premiums going up to, you know, rural hospitals closing to
    • people losing their jobs. I mean, there's an awful lot of stuff going on and let's see if we can unpack that a
    • little bit because there's some responses to that I think are important. So, let's start here with um the fact

    • 0:46
    • November 1st SNAP benefits will not go out
    • that um the administration has said that as of November 1st, the SNAP benefits,
    • supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits that are supposed to be going out to about 42 million Americans
    • will not go out and they are saying that they cannot put those out because of the

    • 1:04
    • shutdown. It's important to remember that SNAP benefits are paid through the
    • US Department of Agriculture. And the reason for that goes back to the New Deal and the fact that the original
    • nutrition programs were designed to uh to um create artificial uh um uh
    • shortages to drive prices up for agricultural products during the the depression. So for that reason, you
    • know, it was a little complicated all the new um what they called the alphabet soup of agencies that they were creating
    • during the depression. Uh the one that ended up being in charge of getting rid of those surpluses to drive up prices
    • was in the agriculture department and therefore our nutrition programs still reside in the department of agriculture
    • which has always struck me as being very odd to be honest, but there they sit. Anyway, um the USDA said in September

    • 2:01
    • when it was coming up for plans for a potential government shutdown that it would be able to use a reserve fund that
    • Congress has established that has about $6 billion in it to fund SNAP programs
    • even when the the government shut down. In addition to that reserve pro uh
    • amount of money, there is another reserve in the USDA that is not specifically
    • earmarked for SNAP that has about $23 billion in it. And it was that one that
    • the USDA tapped to put some money into women's infants and children. That
    • program known as WIC that provides nutrition assistance for women infant women infants and children. It's a great
    • program by the way. um the uh so there are those two funds out there but one is
    • specifically already earmarked for SNAP for the supplemental nutrition assistance program. All right. So when

    • 3:01
    • they put together their um their plans in September, the USDA said that it
    • would be able to use those resources to keep SNAP benefits coming because Congress has made it very clear that it
    • thinks we need to keep those SNAP benefits coming for obvious reasons, right? and it's provided extra money for
    • that to happen. Now, on October 10th, I believe it was, the administration abruptly said, 'No, we can't use those
    • funds. That will be illegal. We cannot use those funds.' And it seems pretty clear that they were doing that to try
    • and put pressure on the Democrats in the Senate to go along with the it's so
    • complicated to go along with the uh continuing resolution that the House Republicans
    • passed to uh fund the government only through November 21st. And mind you, um,
    • House Speaker Mike Johnson has kept the House out out of Washington because it

    • 4:01
    • he doesn't want to negotiate over the continuing resolution. The government's still not going to be funded. They still
    • haven't passed those appropriations bills that need to be passed to fund the government after November 21st. And they
    • should be in Congress working on that um while while the government is shut down.
    • The Senate's still in session, but Johnson does not want to bring the House back into session because he's trying to
    • jam the Senate Democrats and because he doesn't want to swear in Adelita uh
    • Grahalva of Arizona who was elected on September 23rd because she is going to
    • sign the discharge petition that will means that the House will be forced to take a vote on whether or not to uh
    • provide information about um the Epstein investigation.
    • more publicly than it has. And we know that Trump's in those files. All right. So, to go back to SNAP, um there the
    • Republicans are trying really hard to jam the Democrats into going along with

    • 5:01
    • this continuing resolution. And the reason that this matters and the reason that the Democrats have said no, there's
    • a number of reasons, but the most immediate reason is that the when the Republicans passed that
    • bill in Janu uh July, the the continuing resolution, I'm sorry, the um the budget
    • reconciliation bill that they passed without Democratic votes. Um that they
    • basically threw everything in it they wanted. They cut Medicaid. They cut
    • snap. They cut all kinds of stuff, but they did it in such a way that they
    • thought that pigeons wouldn't come home to roost until after the 2026 elections.
    • But they appeared to have overlooked those people who might have cared about it. Now that because the Democrats
    • brought it up, they went ahead and refused to extend the premium tax
    • credits which supported people buying health

    • 6:01
    • insurance on the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare markets. And those premiums,
    • the bills are going out now. They're going out at the end of October, beginning of November. And people's
    • health care premiums are skyrocketing. The average increase average increase I
    • believe is 114% which means that it's more than doubling and those aren't cheap premiums. I mean healthc care is
    • too expensive in this country. Editorializing, sorry about that. That's happening. And the Democrats are saying
    • you can't do this. Not only are you going to have four million people drop off of health insurance, but everybody
    • else's health care premiums are going through the roof. This is not okay. The Republicans want the the the
    • Democrats to cave because they don't want it to be their fault that this happened. They want to be able to say, 'Hey, you signed on to this, too.' And
    • the Democrats are like, 'You can't take people's health care away.' So now the Republicans are saying, 'Okay, well, if

    • 7:00
    • you're going to make a stand on this, we're going to make sure nobody gets fed.' And that's what's at stake right
    • now. So, interestingly enough, and I'll try and pick this up again later, you know who is getting paid in this
    • shutdown? ICE agents, ICE agents are getting paid. They're even getting overtime pay. Um, a real sign, I think,
    • of where the Republican priorities are. But so, what happened today was that 25
    • um Democratic le states that had uh I'm sorry, it's a total of 25. So, it's
    • either Democraticled states, so there are Democratic attorneys general, or the governors of states where the
    • Republicanled legislatures would not sign on. So, that would include Kentucky
    • and um and Kansas. and also the District of Columbia
    • uh sued the USDA the head of the USDA um Brooke um uh
    • Rollins the um Russell vote who's the head of the office of management and

    • 8:04
    • budgets budget and the office of management and budget he's the one making these these decisions about where
    • money is going and the US to say congress very clearly said it intended
    • to have this money go out to people during a shutdown and um and the money
    • is there. You can't just decide not to do what Congress wanted you to do. So,
    • they have sued over that. Even still, obviously, there is going to be um a
    • hiatus here, and that's on on SNAP payments. And that's a really big issue
    • because not only does that mean people who were counting on that money are not going to see it for food, but a number
    • of stores around the country depend on SNAP payments to keep their own margins
    • alive, especially smaller stores um in in rural especially rural parts of the
    • country. So, ironically, maybe not, maybe that's the wrong word, the people who are going to be hurt worst by this,

    • 9:05
    • everybody in this country is going to be hurt, but the people are going to be hurt worst are going to be from
    • Republican rural districts because not only are people not going to be getting SNAP benefits, but also the stores that
    • depend on those SNAP benefits to keep current are going to be falling apart. At the same time that people's health
    • insurance is also going up and rural hospitals are facing closures because of the cuts that were in that budget
    • reconciliation bill to Medicare for Medicaid for example and there will be cuts to Medicare as well. All right. So
    • that's what's going on with the SNAP payments that you asked about. But there's also something weird. I mean I

    • 9:43
    • At an unprecedented moment with this shutdown
    • mean these adjectives are wrong, right? I mean funny weird. It just we're in a
    • really well an unprecedented period because we're having this government shutdown at a time when the Republican
    • dominated Congress has been unable to pass a single appropriations bill, which

    • 10:02
    • is I mean we're so overdue for that. But a a government shutdown is a really big
    • deal. It's it's important. It's a really big deal. It's a bad thing. And normally
    • Congress is in session and it is madly trying to negotiate an end. And in this
    • case, the Republicans have simply said, 'No, we're not going to negotiate. You got to do what we say, even though it's
    • going to hurt the country really badly.' And so it's this weird like pressure
    • to get the Democrats to sign on to hurting the American people really badly. And that's just, you know, it's
    • this weird sense of, you know, the the Republicans could talk the way they did for so long
    • because there were these guard rails that everybody thought that that would never really get taken down. And between
    • Elon Musk and Russell vote and the uh Republicans jamming through that um that

    • 11:01
    • budget reconciliation bill back in July, the guardrails are gone. and it, you
    • know, and now they're sort of saying to the Democrats, well, you have to sign on this, too. And the Democrats are like, we're not signing on to that. At the
    • same time that the pain is starting to hit the American people, and at the same
    • time, of course, that the Republicans have given uh $20 million in a in a um
    • in a dollar peso swap and another guarantee of $20 billion to a Trump ally
    • in Argentina. And at the same time that Trump has torn down the east wing of the White House. And by the way, there is
    • circulating on circulating on social media a right-wing post saying this is a
    • crazy liberal freakout. He only took down this little portico of the East
    • Wing. This is it on Monday. Well, that was it on Monday, but by Friday, the entire East Wing, including the
    • Colonade, was gone. And um and you know, when you see that stuff, if you're at all involved in that stuff, push back
    • because the the East Wing and the Colonade is gone. It is a it is raised

    • 12:01
    • our Azed to the ground. So you have that and this idea of this ballroom at the
    • same time that Americans are facing and again I want to be really clear even if you're not getting SNAP benefits. You
    • are probably shopping at stores that need those SNAP benefits to stay afloat.
    • And certainly I am. And that's going to hurt all of us. So there's this weird like they kind of are wa I mean I feel
    • like you're sort of watching this ideology of the last 40 years kind of hitting this wall and they're trying to
    • get the Democrats to sign on and so far the Democrats are saying no we're going to sue you because this is not what
    • Congress wanted when it provided SNAP benefits. But here's the other thing
    • while Congress is while the the House is not meeting
    • um the president has left the country. I mean, presidents do not leave the country during a shutdown. And Trump
    • left. He was not going to negotiate. He doesn't appear to care about the American people at all. He just left,

    • 13:01
    • which, you know, in the past, presidents have canled overseas trips rather than being away during a shutdown. But he,
    • you know, he clearly is making the point he's not going to negotiate that. He wants the Democrats to do what he said.
    • But here's the weird thing about it, and I got to stop using these adjectives.
    • Um, Trump's not okay. You know, I've been saying that for a while, but if you are watching how he is behaving
    • 13:25

    • Trump is not okay
    • overseas. Um, he well, People magazine today said, you
    • know, he he boasted on Air Force One about taking what appears to have been a
    • dementia exam. And we know he had his first, at least by 2018. That's the
    • first time that um I believe it was NBC reported that he talked about having one. Um he was boasting about what a
    • great job he got a perfect score on what he called an IQ test. But I I promise
    • you identifying a tiger and an elephant um and a giraffe is not on an IQ test.

    • 14:05
    • So there was that weird boastfulness and then he got to he he was weirdly dancing. I think it was in Malaysia. And
    • then he got to Japan for a meeting with um the my notes just
    • went blank. So, we're going to see where we end up here. Um that's was my technical difficulty before. Hang on. Um
    • with the Japanese prime minister and he just he just wandered off. He just
    • started wandering. Um so, um Oh, now my notes are back. This is good.
    • So, um, he's it is it is getting harder and harder and harder to look away from
    • the fact that the president is not okay. And, you know, people are asking what
    • they can do in this moment. And that's one thing really to push, especially a Republican representatives and senators
    • and governors on, do you think that JD Vance is capable of taking over this

    • 15:03
    • government? And do you think the president is okay? Because the fact that this dude has the nuclear codes, I mean,
    • he probably doesn't remember he has the nuclear codes, but certainly his behavior is very erratic. And the fact
    • that he felt able uh to tear down the east wing of the White House with no
    • permits, no permissions, no consultation with Congress, nothing suggests that he
    • does not have any inhibitions. And that is profoundly, profoundly dangerous. But
    • so here's one of the other things that is going on while this is happening. While he is overseas,

    • 15:43
    • Who’s calling the shots while Trump is away?
    • um there have been big changes going on domestically in the United States, which does raise the question of who is making
    • these decisions. So on the 27th, I think I've lost track of what day it
    • is, the White House, and that's I I I hope I sat made it sound like that was

    • 16:01
    • in quotation marks. The White House announced that it was switching out ICE
    • field agents in critical uh locations and replacing them with officers from um
    • CBP, Customs and Border Patrol. And that matters because for all that we have
    • focused on ICE agents that is Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE
    • agents do have a a long his not long have a history in the places where the
    • field commanders have been and they are traditionally charged with going after
    • actual criminals and they have been focusing since Trump got in office of deporting
    • undocumented migrants, undocumented immigrants, and you know, they have certainly overreached and they've
    • certainly, at least it looks like that to me. I'm not a judge in a jury over here, but people are rightly unhappy

    • 17:01
    • about the activities of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. But the real wacko
    • behavior is Customs and Border Patrol. the the Blackhawk helicopter in Chicago
    • for example and so on has been um Customs and Border Patrol and that's if
    • you remember I've been really pretty careful to distinguish about which federal agents are doing what and also
    • to point out that these are not military personnel um and who have been
    • much more reluctant to have anything to do with with anything that the administration is trying to get them to
    • do. But so it appears from reporting um
    • I'm going to say reporting in general. I read it um at MSNBC, but I it's I've
    • seen it elsewhere as well. And I I like to trace back who got the original story just because it feels like that's a lot
    • of work for those reporters to do. And I try and call that out and I don't yet know where that original story came from

    • 18:00
    • and I need to find that. But um the it appears from the reporting that is out
    • there that the person who has made the lists is Corey Luwendowski. Corey
    • Luwendowski is a special government employee working under the Department of Homeland Security and the Secretary
    • Christy Gnome. Um he again an unelected official that is working with Christine
    • Gnome. You might want to look that one up. Um those of you who are interested in that relationship there. Um, and it
    • appears that he did those lists acting with um, um, Bavino. Uh, what's his
    • first name? Greg. Hold on. I do have this written down.
    • Um, yes, it is Greg Bavino. Who is one of the sector chiefs of Customs and
    • Border Patrol, but who is one of the guys who's really pushing the tear gas
    • and the and the real violence. He was in court today in Chicago for apparently um

    • 19:02
    • breaking a judge's uh express order and he has been ordered to report to her
    • every day to prove that he is not deliberately breaking the law. So there's this this big switch there. Um
    • while Trump was out of town, there was also a really big switch in the defense

    • 19:22
    • Defense Department, strikes without evidence
    • department. Now remember the defense department has uh gotten rid of all the
    • official original official defense department reporters who were very very good uh
    • because they wanted the defense department officials under defense secretary Pete Hexith wanted reporters
    • to sign an agreement saying they would report on nothing that was not expressly
    • authorized by officials in the defense department. And to be clear, that's not
    • just you can't re, you know, reproduce classified information. That's they
    • wanted to have to get a be able to rubber stamp anything that came out of the defense department. Well, this is

    • 20:04
    • part of Hegath's real attempt to stop leaks coming out of the uh department
    • because he's, you know, he's, you know, he's having a hard time over there. But they got rid of those. They said you
    • couldn't report from there unless you signed this non this dis this this agreement and uh all the traditional
    • reporters walked out and they were replaced with right-wing podcasters and really kind of fringe people. If you
    • remember one of the teams that walked out was the Fox News Channel. So we're talking the people who were left are
    • people like Tim P who was uh is a right-wing podcaster who before the 2024
    • election was actually being funded by Russia. Right. So um the the defense
    • department has asked members of the defense department to sign a
    • nondisclosure agreement. Mind you, all these officials can't re
    • release any kind of national secrets, but they want them to sign a non-disclosure agreement for anything

    • 21:06
    • related to the strikes in Latin America. What's with that?
    • Now, we've also had today another three strikes taking out four boats in the
    • Eastern Pacific. And again, if you remember, the um the White House, I'm
    • sorry, the Defense Department and the White House have both insisted that those people that it is killing are
    • those who are trafficking narcotics to the United States. And yet
    • those boats are small boats and they are, you know, a thousand miles from the US or more. they would have to stop
    • significantly for refueling. There are a lot of real holes to this story and the
    • White House has not provided any evidence to back up their allegations to
    • lawmakers or to the public. And finally, even Republican lawmakers are like, you know, you can't do this. What are you

    • 22:00
    • doing? What are you doing out there? And the um the um you and saying, you know,
    • you have to give us some kind of information about what you were doing. And yet, um, now we've got this, uh,
    • call for a non-disclosure agreement and increasing rumblings from people like Lindsey Graham, uh, senator from South
    • Carolina, saying that, um, in fact, this is all a prelude to a larger military
    • um, enterprise in Latin America. uh which is again Congress has been
    • completely cut out of this and this has has taken on um you know taken off while
    • Trump is overseas. So that is also going on and then there is the fact that um
    • the oh wait there's some more stuff over here. Um um I'm going to give you a little bit
    • more on this and then I will go back to uh some one

    • 23:00
    • of the final large questions here. So one of the things that that you are
    • seeing in the midst of all this and there's a bigger pattern here I think is also the attempt on the part of elected

    • 23:11
    • Pattern of Republicans messing with the upcoming vote next week
    • Republicans to um to mess with this upcoming vote next week. Next week.
    • Yeah. Next week. week from today um to mess with this upcoming vote by putting
    • um uh officers in the streets um and by having poll watchers in I think it's New
    • Jersey and California both uh states where there are elections with national
    • implications on the ballot and you're seeing an increasing focus on um I think
    • trying both to undercut the idea that Trump has dementia by suggesting that Biden did, but also trying to hit home
    • the idea that an that if Democrats are elected, the election was not legitimate. And you can see Trump
    • setting up this argument through his posts on social media talking about how the election in 2020 was rigged despite

    • 24:05
    • the fact his own people and all the courts that were asked to to look into it said it was not. you know, this idea
    • that somehow there's going to be some uh something illegal going on in 2026 and
    • 2028. And what they're really trying to set up here is the idea that nobody but a Republican can legitimately uh win an
    • election. And that's, you know, completely contrary both to reality, but also to the principles of American
    • democracy. And that um you know, again, you're seeing this in a lot of different places. And you're also seeing it,
    • interestingly enough, in Trump's increasing emphasis on the idea he's going to run in 2028. That's interesting
    • because that's in part, you know, him not wanting to take second fiddle to anybody, but also because I think he
    • really doesn't want people to be talking about the fact that he's not performing his job very well and probably other
    • people are starting to eye that job and he doesn't want that to happen. So, at

    • 25:04
    • the same time, you've got the the all these things happening that are really bad for the American people. You've got
    • Congress and the president basically checking out and and then you've also
    • got them saying, 'But you have to reelect us because we are the only legitimate people to run this country.'
    • And all of those things together to me don't work. That's an equation that doesn't work. And I think you can see
    • that in the the truly abysmal poll rating that Trump has now. Uh lowest for
    • anybody ever, not just him in his first term. Uh he's gone below that as well.
    • Um and you also have um what else is this here? Um, you also again have
    • increasing discomfort on the part of rep Republican electeds because as people
    • lose food, as they lose health insurance, as they lose jobs, as the farmers are hit ba bad and so on, who

    • 26:00
    • are you going to call? You're going to call your representatives and the people who are getting the hurt worst right hurt worst right now are those people in
    • Republican districts. So, I think you're going to see a lot of that going forward. and and somebody asked um

    • 26:08
    • How did we get from the Gilded Age to the Progressive Era?
    • me to to talk about how did we get from the guilded age to the progressive era,
    • an era that the guilded age looked very much like today looks to us and um and how did the progressive era come out of
    • that is in the way it does. And I wanted to answer that because um what the way
    • we got there is very similar to it feels very similar to where we are now. when
    • people during the guilded age got to a point where they really recognized that the system was rigged against ordinary
    • Americans, you know, for decades the Republicans had been telling them that the problem with the economy was not the
    • robber barons. the problem was, you know, the the African-Americans in the South or the immigrants in the cities or

    • 27:01
    • lazy farmers or there was always some reason that the economy wasn't very good
    • and that there came a time when finally people looked around and said, 'Wait a minute, you're building mansions in
    • Newport, Massachusetts, and having parties um that are costing, you know,
    • millions of dollars in today's dollars. Well, we're working jobs where we can't begin to make ends meet. we need to redo
    • this system. Key to that was um having a press that recognized what was going on
    • and was starting to report on it. And that really hits home to me today when I was thinking about doing this um this uh
    • politics chat today. I hope you got that figuring out what was going on with SNAP
    • and how Democratic states are trying to push back on that, that's really complicated and you know untangling it.
    • I I'm pretty deep into this stuff now, so for me to untangle it wasn't a big deal. But I promise you that would have
    • been really hard, at least for me, to untangle 10 years ago when there would

    • 28:04
    • be a story about SNAP in a newspaper and I'd have to try and put it all together myself. The fact we have people like me,
    • but also all the other producers now saying, 'Hey, you want to understand
    • what's going on with this legal case? I'll walk you through it.' I think is key to understanding how the government
    • works and I think it's been key to waking people up. So I would say we're going on a good track here for helping
    • people understand not just that Trump is whackadoodle
    • but that the system has not worked for 40 freaking years because the very
    • wealthy took it over and took it out of the hands of the rest of us. And that's not to to say that um that you know I'm
    • making some great communist argument. I'm saying that in order for democracy to work, one person needs one vote and
    • we need to have accurate in information about what's going on so that we can use

    • 29:04
    • our votes wisely. And I feel like we're getting toward that. So, let me um let
    • br>
    • 29:10
    • Where we are and what we can do
    • me go to uh a final couple things about um about where we are and what we can
    • do. So, lots of people frustrated, lots of people frightened, lots of people worried about where the country is
    • going. And I say amen to all of that, but do not forget and you know there there
    • are some of us screaming about this and everybody should be. A week from today, we have a major election on the ballots.
    • 52,000 races out there. Um, in Maine, for example, people are tying themselves in
    • knots over who's going to run for Senate in a year. Like, in a year, who knows
    • what's going to be happening. Now, the primaries aren't even until next June. But, you know what's happening in a week? We have a vote on whether or not a
    • measure that is backed by the wealthiest Republicans around the country is going to pass. And that measure will take away

    • 30:03
    • the opportunity for about 40% of Mainers who vote by absentee ballot to vote.
    • That's a really important vote. If you are in Maine, turn and you vote in Maine, turn out and vote to make sure
    • people keep access to absentee voting. And that's one, you know, people are all, like I say, they're all upset about
    • this Senate race that isn't happening until way over the horizon. This is happening in a week. Turn out for it.
    • get people to turn out for it. There's gubernatorial races in Virginia and North and um New Jersey. There's
    • Proposition 50 in California to try and change gerrymandering um until just
    • until the uh 2030 census to try and counteract what the Republicans have
    • done in Texas by their midterm gerrymandering there, which is going to be permanent until a new legislature
    • tries to redo that after 2030. you know there get involved at in the states

    • 31:02
    • Pennsylvania where there are state senate I'm sorry state supreme court races that are important you know there
    • all of these races are critically important and showing up for them and turning people out for them because
    • these will be turn these will be turnout elections is crucially crucially crucially important. So there's that you
    • can do, but there is also pressure to be kept up at the national level. You know, I was not an Epstein

    • 31:32
    • Keep up national pressure on the Epstein files
    • conspiracy person like at all. I didn't even really pay a ton of attention to it
    • except as oh this is a traumatic experience and I hope for the the survivors who have been heroic and I
    • hope that the law comes after the guilty people. But I have come around because
    • of what I would call the space around the elephant. Anything that that the Republicans are so afraid of that the
    • House Speaker will not let the House hold meetings has got to be something we want to see. I want to see anyway. Keep

    • 32:06
    • that pressure up on the Epstein files. And I think we really need to call out
    • to our especially Republican representatives Trump's mental state because I gotta
    • tell you this is not normal. I mean this is what is we've certainly had presidents before who were not okay. You
    • think of um Richard Nixon who was drinking heavily in his last uh days in
    • the White House to the point that Henry Kissinger said to people don't take orders from him without coming to me because he's drinking too much. Um, you
    • think about, well, even for that matter, I'm not never mind. I'm not going to go down president's drinking habits, but
    • um, but you think about the fact that Woodrow Wilson had a stroke while in office, but he too was kept pretty clo
    • under pretty close wraps by advisers, including his wife, who were very careful to make sure that the orders
    • that came out of a mentally impaired president did not impact the government.

    • 33:02
    • And you know, throughout our history, we have had presidents who weren't okay. In this case, Trump appears to be
    • surrounded by people who are using him for their own ends and are not therefore inclined to call attention to his mental
    • incapacity or to um to stop it because, as I say, now that he's overseas, all of
    • a sudden stuff's happening here. Um I think we need to call that out for our own safety. That's another big thing to
    • do. Now, we also have the issue coming up of the fact we're going to we have these, at least on the books right now,
    • these snap cuts. And you know what? Even if they end up restoring that money, we're going into the holiday season.
    • People are going to be losing their jobs. Um, we need to make sure that we are looking out for our neighbors and
    • making sure that food banks are supplied. And this is not my area of
    • specialty. Please check with those people who are already in the business and ask them what they need. Um whether

    • 34:04
    • I I and I'm not even going to speculate because it's not my my um my ballowick,
    • but I will tell you there are people who've devoted their lives to making sure people who need food get it.
    • They're the ones to ask what to do to make sure they do get it. That's one way we can remind people that we live in a
    • country that helps each other out and that our politics should reflect that. Um, what else can we do? Um, I think the

    • 34:30
    • Register to vote, push back against misinformation, keep the joy
    • other things that I always talk about, make sure you are registered to vote. Help other people register to vote. Um,
    • make sure that you push back against disinformation and spread good information and um, and make sure again
    • that we try and keep the creativity and joy that we had in the no king's day. um
    • and that we carry that forward as we envision what a new government, a new
    • American government can look like because we clearly have to fix an awful

    • 35:00
    • lot of things that we thought were going along okay and weren't. So, um so again,
    • keep thinking about what that looks like. And one of the things that is interesting, and I'm not going to go into it right now because I've already
    • run over, but for all that things feel like there are
    • few windows opening in as the doors are closing, there are new and really
    • provocative and to my mind potentially successful ways in which people are rethinking the
    • way we do things in this country and um and you know some of them are going to
    • take and that um that I think is actually really hopeful and I'm not
    • going to go into that more now because I don't want to get people um um too excited about things that aren't I'm not
    • a lawyer that are not necessarily going to work out but look around you people are coming up with interesting new ways

    • 36:00
    • to do things that I think might pay off down the line so so do keep the faith
    • and Um and um get people out to vote. Uh we got a week left for this election and
    • and get your friends, get people out to vote, get in touch with the organizations turning people out for these elections and um and we'll see
    • where we are after next week. Um I will see you again on Thursday. And um I'm
    • doing a bunch of really cool interviews this week. Just a reminder, by the way, um I do write up a lot of what's going
    • on in the country along with history at um at both on Substack and on Facebook.
    • It's always free. And the YouTube channel, same thing. Um although what I do on the in the in the letters
    • is keep a record of what is happening. Um and I don't talk about things you can
    • do to change stuff. and that frustrates some people, but it's not the same project as these what's going on videos
    • or some of the activist videos I do. So, if you're interested, those things are there. And um and I think that's it for


SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.