image missing
Date: 2025-08-21 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00028986
CANADA
WHAT IS HAPPENING TO ESSENTIAL LUMBER?

The Brief Reporter: BREAKING: Trump FREAKS OUT as Carney Flips the Lumber Crisis — U.S. Housing Takes the Hit


Original article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBrX7mKA9Z8
BREAKING: Trump FREAKS OUT as Carney Flips the Lumber Crisis — U.S. Housing Takes the Hit

The Brief Reporter

2.15K subscribers

Aug 7, 2025

#trumptariffs #DonaldTrump #ChinaTradeWar

BREAKING: Trump FREAKS OUT as Carney Flips the Lumber Crisis — U.S. Housing Takes the Hit

Trump slapped a 35% tariff on Canadian softwood lumber, expecting Canada to fold under pressure. But Prime Minister Carney flipped the script, launching a $1B support plan and redirecting lumber into domestic housing. Now, U.S. homebuilders are facing skyrocketing costs, and construction delays are piling up. In this episode, we break down how Canada’s bold pivot turned Trump’s trade war into a domestic crisis — and why the U.S. housing market may be the first casualty.

Disclaimer:

This video's content reflects the author's personal beliefs based on the information and research at hand. It is not a proposal for policy or financial advice.

The Fair Use concept governs the use of third-party content for analysis, commentary, and teaching.

This video uses AI-generated voices and images.

Updates to policies and changes in the market could cause information to change. Before making choices, viewers should do their own research.

#trumptariffs #DonaldTrump #ChinaTradeWar #breakingnews #TheBriefReporter #g7summit2025

How this content was made ... Altered or synthetic content

Sound or visuals were significantly edited or digitally generated. Learn more

The Brief Reporter 2.15K subscribers Videos About
  • Trump Stunned As He Tries to Corner Canada, But It Backfires — Here’s How Carney Plays the Long Game ... by The Brief Reporter
  • 1 MIN AGO: Trump Tries to Corner Canada, But It Backfires — Carney Turns Minerals into Leverage ... by The Brief Reporter
  • BREAKING: Trump Goes Nuts As His Steel Tariff on Canada Backfires — U.S. Automakers Feel the Pain ... by The Brief Reporter
by The Brief Reporter 138 Trump China Tariffs Update by The Brief Reporter 8 Comments
Peter Burgess COMMENTARY



Peter Burgess
Transcript
  • 0:00
  • For decades, the United States has
  • alternated between confrontation and
  • collaboration, frequently applying
  • unfounded,
  • counterveailing, and anti-dumping duties
  • against Canadian softwood. Let's be
  • clear, Canada does not dump lumber into
  • the United States. When President Trump
  • raised tariffs on Canadian softwood
  • lumber to nearly 35% this August, he
  • claimed Canada was dumping cheap wood
  • into the US market. But the numbers tell
  • a deeper story. Nearly 70% of softwood
  • lumber imported into the US comes from
  • Canada, a supply chain that's been built
  • over decades to support everything from
  • new home construction to disaster
  • recovery in states like California. What
  • Trump didn't say is that the US logging
  • industry isn't built to replace that
  • supply. The country may have the trees,
  • but not the sawmills or the workforce.
  • According to interviews on Fox Business
  • with industry experts, it would take 5
  • to 10 years to scale up domestic milling
  • capacity. And that's if federal

  • 1:01
  • regulations on forest access were
  • loosened, which remains politically and
  • legally uncertain.
  • The counterveailing duties that are set
  • to go up very soon, this ludicrous
  • section 232 investigation. And so we
  • could be dealing with duties and tariffs
  • combined well over 35%. I think
  • Americans are going to be finding out
  • very shortly the impact that these
  • duties are going to be having on them.
  • The effects won't stay in spreadsheets.
  • They're already hitting home, literally.
  • Economists from sources like
  • Investopedia project that rising lumber
  • costs could push construction expenses
  • up by 10 to 15%.
  • In wildfireprone areas like California,
  • where rebuilding is urgent, that means
  • families face higher prices, longer
  • delays, and fewer options. And it's not
  • just disaster zones. From suburbs in
  • Texas to apartment projects in Illinois,
  • developers are reconsidering timelines
  • and budgets. Trump once promised to

  • 2:02
  • build more homes to address the housing
  • crisis. But his tariff strategy may now
  • be one of the very reasons why new
  • housing becomes less affordable.
  • The forest industry is a pillar of the
  • Canadian economy. Today, I'm announcing
  • a series of new measures to help the
  • softwood lumber industry pivot to a
  • growing Canadian market and to the
  • markets of reliable trading partners
  • around the world.
  • In Ottawa, Prime Minister Mark Carney
  • didn't lash out. Instead, he redirected
  • His government unveiled over1 billion
  • Canadian dollars in support for the
  • softwood lumber industry. A package made
  • up of loan guarantees, grants for
  • product diversification, and workforce
  • support. The largest portion, 700
  • million Canadian dollars, will be
  • accessible even to small and
  • medium-sized firms struggling with
  • liquidity after 8 years of trade
  • uncertainty. But Carney's move wasn't
  • just financial, it was strategic. He

  • 3:02
  • tied the support directly to a new $25
  • billion federal home building program
  • launching this fall. Canadian lumber
  • won't sit idle. It will be used to build
  • affordable housing at home. The message
  • is clear. If the US won't take Canadian
  • lumber under fair conditions, Canada
  • will create its own demand.
  • Now, the US could increase the amount
  • that it imports from countries like
  • Germany or Sweden in terms of just
  • softwood, but they do not have enough to
  • completely replace how much we get from
  • Canada.
  • The US may impose tariffs, but it can't
  • easily walk away from Canadian lumber.
  • Alternative suppliers like Sweden or
  • Germany simply don't have enough
  • capacity to fill the gap. Meanwhile, US
  • mills are already operating at full
  • throttle with no surge capacity to speak
  • of. That's why Canada's calm response
  • speaks volumes. Carney's team is
  • shifting toward diversification with new

  • 4:01
  • trade missions to Vietnam and Japan and
  • a renewed push to expand Canada's market
  • reach. As BC Forestry Minister Ravi
  • Parmar put it, 'The US will soon feel
  • the consequences, not just in trade
  • figures, but in the real world cost of
  • wood, homes, and materials Americans
  • rely on.
  • What Trump framed as a hardline trade
  • maneuver may turn into economic
  • self-sabotage.
  • Canadian lumber producers now have
  • capital to survive, time to adapt, and
  • political backing to pivot. Carney's
  • government is even preparing workforce
  • transition programs to support 6,000
  • workers. Not because the industry is
  • collapsing, but because it's evolving.
  • And as Canada pushes forward, the
  • pressure is quietly building on Trump.
  • Higher prices, frustrated developers,
  • and mounting costs for US consumers all
  • point to the same reality. Canada didn't
  • blink, it built.
  • As Trump doubles down on tariffs, Canada

  • 5:00
  • is building resilience. And in this
  • standoff, it's not always the loudest
  • side that's winning. Sometimes it's the
  • side that simply keeps building.
  • Uh we're working very diligently with
  • Europe, the EU, which covers a lot of
  • ter, you know, a lot of territory, a lot
  • of countries.
  • We haven't we haven't really uh we don't
  • have a deal with Canada. We haven't been
  • focused on.
  • Just days before his self-imposed August
  • 1st deadline, President Donald Trump
  • said it out loud. The US hasn't really
  • been focused on Canada and might not
  • even reach a trade deal. It wasn't just
  • a shrug. It was a statement of
  • disregard. In the middle of highstakes
  • negotiations, Trump dismissed America's
  • largest trading partner as an
  • afterthought. He hinted Canada could
  • simply pay the tariffs with no real
  • negotiation. To many in Ottawa, this
  • wasn't a threat. It was a signal.
  • Because unlike his approach with Japan
  • or the UK where pressure was carefully
  • escalated, this moment revealed

  • 6:00
  • something else. Impatience. And that
  • impatience may have just handed Canada a
  • strategic edge.
  • Yeah. And the first thing everyone needs
  • to do is exhale. Because what the
  • president just said there actually lines
  • up very consistently with what we heard
  • from Canada's uh negotiators on this.
  • For weeks, the Canadian government has
  • worked to manage public expectations.
  • Prime Minister Mark Carney, Minister
  • Dominic Leblanc, and Ambassador Kirsten
  • Hillman have all echoed one message.
  • Canada won't rush into a bad deal.
  • Trump's public remarks ended up
  • confirming that very narrative. When the
  • US president openly admitted a deal may
  • not happen, he gave Canada cover. Now,
  • if talks break down, Ottawa won't take
  • the blame because Washington walked away
  • first. It's a rare case where silence
  • from Canada was matched by a loud
  • concession from the other side. For
  • Ottawa, that's a communications victory,
  • even without a signed agreement.

  • 7:02
  • Trump's comments also put his own trade
  • team in a difficult position. Commerce
  • Secretary Howard Lutnik and US Trade
  • Representative Jameson Greer have been
  • actively engaging with Canada,
  • describing talks as constructive and
  • productive. LeBlanc has spent days in
  • Washington meeting with senators and
  • senior officials. Yet, as his own
  • officials were making progress, Trump
  • sent a different message to the world.
  • Negotiations might not matter at all.
  • This internal contradiction weakens the
  • American position. It allows Canadian
  • officials to question who holds the real
  • authority and to sloww walk discussions
  • until a coherent US stance emerges. The
  • more fractured the American message, the
  • more leverage Canada gains.
  • But perhaps the biggest consequence of
  • Trump's remarks won't be felt this week.
  • It'll come in 2026.
  • Under the terms of the USMCA, the
  • agreement must undergo a mandatory
  • review that begins with a free trade
  • commission meeting expected by late

  • 8:01
  • 2025. Trump's team has already signaled
  • plans to use that review to push for
  • stricter origin rules, immigration
  • clauses, and supply chain controls.
  • However, if the US imposes 35% tariffs
  • on Canada now without achieving a
  • negotiated outcome, that strategy may
  • backfire. Canada and Mexico will be able
  • to argue that tariffs have already
  • failed as leverage.
  • Worse, Trump may find himself entering
  • the 2026 review with less credibility
  • and fewer tools. Meanwhile, Canada is
  • preparing its own parallel track. A
  • proposed security and economic agreement
  • to solidify its defense commitments and
  • regional cooperation.
  • That deal, still in early stages, could
  • give Ottawa a new foundation for talks
  • and weaken Trump's ability to dominate
  • the agenda.
  • What looked like a warning, may actually
  • be a leak. Trump likely believed he was
  • turning up the pressure. But by speaking
  • too soon and undercutting his own
  • negotiators, he exposed the cracks in

  • 9:01
  • his trade strategy. He gave Canada a
  • narrative it can control, a pace it can
  • set, and a reason to delay until the
  • balance shifts. There's still time for a
  • deal, but if there isn't one, it won't
  • just be Canada that pays the price.
  • Trump's own credibility heading into
  • 2026 may be what gets taxed next.
  • They call it pink gold. Pod ash is a
  • vital ingredient for growing food. And
  • Canada production volume. It's now being
  • touted as a secret weapon in this trade
  • war with the United States. Join.
  • The countdown is on. Canada and the
  • United States are deep in trade talks,
  • facing a hard deadline, August 1st. If
  • no deal is reached, President Trump has
  • vowed to impose a sweeping 35% tariff on
  • Canadian imports. It's not just a
  • threat. It's already been formalized in
  • writing. Behind closed doors, Prime
  • Minister Mark Carney is walking a
  • tightroppe. On one side, Canada's

  • 10:00
  • economy still heavily tied to the US
  • market. On the other, a US president
  • who's turned tariffs into a political
  • weapon. Carney's strategy has been quiet
  • but deliberate. He's paused Canada's
  • digital services tax, offered symbolic
  • defense cooperation through the US
  • missile shield program, and tried to
  • avoid any public confrontation.
  • But now, many in Canada believe that's
  • not enough. They say it's time to put
  • real pressure on Trump. And one word
  • keeps coming up, potach
  • Gulf Islands member of parliament,
  • Elizabeth May. She's calling on Carney
  • to continue collecting the digital sales
  • tax. is also pitching stopping the $4.9
  • billion exportation of Canadian potach,
  • a key ingredient for fertilizer to
  • American farmers.
  • Potach is a key ingredient in
  • fertilizer. Without it, global food
  • production would shrink dramatically.
  • According to the food and agriculture
  • organization, over 50% of the world's
  • food supply depends on fertilizers and

  • 11:02
  • potach provides the potassium that makes
  • them effective. Canada holds the largest
  • reserves of potach on the planet with
  • most production centered in
  • Saskatchewan. The United States by
  • contrast produced only around 400,000
  • metric tons of potach in 2023 while
  • consuming more than 5.3 million tons.
  • The numbers speak for themselves. The US
  • depends on Canadian potach and that
  • makes it different from other traded
  • goods. Cars, aluminum, even
  • semiconductors can be sourced elsewhere.
  • But with Russia and Bellarus, the two
  • other major global suppliers, facing
  • sanctions or instability, Canada is
  • essentially the only reliable source
  • left, any disruption could push
  • fertilizer prices up and with it the
  • cost of food across North America.
  • That's why some Canadian leaders are
  • calling for action. They want the
  • federal government to put potach on the
  • negotiating table, not just as a
  • commodity, but as a bargaining chip. One

  • 12:00
  • proposal includes halting the $4.9
  • billion in potach exports to the US
  • entirely.
  • Another suggests creating a national
  • strategic reserve supported by public
  • investment through bonds, an idea costed
  • by Canada's parliamentary budget office
  • during the 2025 federal election. Their
  • logic is simple. If Trump is using pain
  • as leverage, Canada should do the same.
  • And if that pain touches US farmers, one
  • of Trump's most loyal constituencies, it
  • may force a recalibration in Washington.
  • But the simple logic is if the price of
  • the fertilizer goes up that much,
  • yeah, food prices,
  • everything goes up and yeah, it's food.
  • There's a risk in weaponizing potach.
  • It's not just another industrial input.
  • It's tied directly to food supply,
  • inflation, and food security. Disrupting
  • potach shipments could hurt not only US
  • farmers but ripple through the global
  • economy. Industry leaders in
  • Saskatchewan warned that tariffs and

  • 13:00
  • trade barriers on potach are different.
  • Unlike cars or steel, potach is not
  • optional. It's essential. That's why
  • some argue Canada doesn't need to issue
  • threats. The numbers alone, the
  • dependency, the market imbalance are
  • powerful enough. The mere possibility of
  • disruption may be all the leverage
  • Canada needs.
  • Trump thrives on confrontation. He
  • pushes hard, expecting others to blink.
  • But this time, he may have met a
  • different kind of resistance. Not loud,
  • not angry, but strategic. Pontach isn't
  • just Canada's economic strength. It's
  • America's agricultural lifeline.
  • Whether Canada uses it openly or
  • quietly, it may be the one card strong
  • enough to bring Trump back to the table.
  • Not with bluster, but with a deal.
  • Selva that Brazil will respond in kind
  • with its own tariffs if the US goes
  • through what it wants to do by August 1.
  • Your thoughts?
  • President Donald Trump's secondterm
  • trade doctrine has entered a volatile

  • 14:00
  • phase. In recent weeks, the
  • administration has issued formal notices
  • to a string of trade partners. 35%
  • tariffs on Canada, 30% on Mexico, 50% on
  • Brazil. These aren't just economic
  • decisions. They are calculated power
  • plays and the world is responding.
  • Rather than strengthening American
  • leverage, Trump's tariff blitz is
  • hardening resistance.
  • Countries that once depended on US trade
  • are now coordinating responses and in
  • some cases turning away altogether.
  • We both agree that it is essential to
  • respect the USMCA trade agreements and
  • we shared our experiences about the
  • letter we received from President Trump.
  • One of the clearest signs that Trump's
  • pressure is backfiring came this week
  • when Canada and Mexico publicly pledged
  • to strengthen bilateral trade. Both
  • countries confirmed they had received
  • tariff letters from the US, 35% for
  • Canada, 30% for Mexico, set to take

  • 15:00
  • effect August 1st if negotiations fail.
  • In response, Canadian Prime Minister
  • Mark Carney and Mexican President
  • Claudia Shinbomb agreed to deepen
  • economic cooperation.
  • Carney is expected to visit Mexico in
  • the coming weeks to formalize joint
  • strategies. For two neighbors long tied
  • to the US through the USMCA, this pivot
  • marks a significant realignment. Rather
  • than fracture, Trump's tariff threats
  • are pushing America's closest allies to
  • close ranks without the US.
  • Consider that maybe for the last 50
  • years, we are going through the the
  • worst moment in the relation between
  • Brazilian and Washington.
  • Tensions are even sharper further south.
  • Brazil was hit with the steepest tariff,
  • 50% on all exports to the US, up from
  • 10% announced in April. Trump framed the
  • move as retaliation for what he called
  • political persecution of former
  • Brazilian President Jaier Bolsinaro, who
  • faces charges for his role in the

  • 16:01
  • January 2023 coup attempt. Brazilian
  • President Louise Inasio Lula D Silva
  • rejected the move as an act of political
  • interference. His administration
  • immediately activated a new fast
  • response tariff mechanism authorizing
  • counter tariffs against US goods.
  • According to Brazil's Ministry of
  • Development, only 12% of Brazilian
  • exports are destined for the US,
  • allowing the country to redirect trade
  • with minimal disruption. The sectors
  • affected include oil, orange juice,
  • coffee, and steel. While the economic
  • exposure is manageable, the diplomatic
  • damage is real. Lula has publicly
  • signaled a shift toward deeper ties with
  • BICRs nations and Asian partners. A
  • trend accelerated by Trump's moves.
  • This is unilateralism and it's highly
  • personalistic. It's President Trump
  • because he doesn't like somebody. And um
  • you know and and I think it has very
  • severe implications for US relations

  • 17:00
  • with Latin America. The ripple effects
  • go beyond Brazil. In Colombia, relations
  • have deteriorated rapidly after
  • allegations emerged, linking US figures
  • to an attempted political plot. Trump
  • responded by recalling the US ambassador
  • and threatening to revoke Colombia's
  • drug cooperation certification, a move
  • that could cut vital aid. But instead of
  • backing down, President Gustavo Petro
  • has pushed back. His administration is
  • now exploring deeper ties with BRICS
  • institutions, including development
  • financing outside the US orbit. Across
  • Latin America, a quiet realignment is
  • underway. Countries are looking to
  • diversify trade, reduce political
  • exposure, and limit dependency on
  • Washington. Trump's aggressive stance
  • may be aimed at asserting dominance. But
  • the region's reaction suggests it's
  • having the opposite effect.
  • I mean, is it a political failure for
  • the prime minister if if Canada ends up
  • at some level of tariffs at the end of
  • this, or is it just the reality of
  • dealing with Donald Trump?

  • 18:01
  • What began as a strategy to strengthen
  • US leverage is now showing signs of
  • unraveling. Rather than forcing deals on
  • America's terms, the tariff campaign is
  • driving partners together and away from
  • Washington's orbit. Canada is no longer
  • negotiating alone. Mexico is no longer
  • avoiding alignment. Brazil, once
  • neutral, is openly confronting US
  • influence. And in Europe, even close
  • allies are preparing for long-term trade
  • diversification.
  • For the Trump administration, the
  • short-term political optics may still
  • resonate with parts of the domestic
  • base, but the long-term cost is rising.
  • Fractured trust, declining diplomatic
  • capital, and global supply chains that
  • are learning to work around, not
  • through, the United States. The real
  • impact of these tariffs may not be in
  • what they tax, it may be in what they
  • break.
  • Let's talk about the framework trade
  • deal that was reached between the US and
  • the EU yesterday. Uh Emanuel Macron has

  • 19:01
  • said that the the deal is a dark day for
  • Europe.
  • Don't know if the exact numbers will be
  • the same that Canada will get in so far
  • as we are witnessing in Europe a deal
  • that is not good for Europe.
  • Donald Trump just signed another trade
  • deal. this time with the European Union.
  • It wasn't subtle. A 15% tariff across
  • most goods, hundreds of billions in
  • energy purchases and investment into the
  • US economy, a flashy handshake in
  • Scotland, and not a single mention of
  • Canada. That silence speaks volumes.
  • Canada is the United States largest
  • trading partner by many measures, but
  • this time it's not being prioritized,
  • and that's not an accident. It's a
  • strategy. For Trump, trade isn't just
  • about economics. It's about optics and
  • leverage. The EU gave him a global
  • headline and billions in buying
  • commitments. Canada doesn't offer that
  • kind of short-term political payoff, so
  • it's pushed aside.

  • 20:00
  • That doesn't mean Canada lacks leverage.
  • It supplies 4 million barrels of oil per
  • day to the US. It powers homes with
  • crossber electricity. It provides
  • critical inputs for American
  • manufacturing from lumber to auto parts.
  • But here's the problem. Those links are
  • already in place. Canada can't promise
  • more the way Japan or the EU can. It's
  • already embedded in US supply chains.
  • That makes it harder to turn existing
  • value into a new deal that looks
  • impressive on paper. Trump wants deals
  • that are simple to sell. Buy American,
  • pay tariffs, sign here. Canada's reality
  • is more complex and less marketable. In
  • this environment, complexity becomes a
  • disadvantage.
  • Buy a bunch of stuff from America and
  • tariffs across the board. 15 20 18% 19%
  • in one case. This is the challenge that
  • partners are facing. This is the
  • challenge that we are facing. I don't

  • 21:00
  • believe there is going to be a great
  • deal to be had on the table.
  • Prime Minister Mark Carney knows this.
  • That's why he's not rushing into
  • anything. In his recent statements,
  • Carney made it clear Canada will only
  • accept a deal that works long-term, not
  • just to avoid tariffs this week, but to
  • protect its economic structure for the
  • years ahead. Unlike the EU, Canada
  • doesn't need to buy US energy. In fact,
  • it's the exporter. That makes its
  • position fundamentally different. Carney
  • understands that copying the EU
  • framework would be a mismatch, even if
  • it buys short-term relief. Instead, his
  • team is holding the line. They're
  • managing public expectations, preparing
  • for possible tariffs, and quietly aiming
  • for a better opportunity, such as the
  • scheduled USMCA review in 2026. It's a
  • long game, and it's deliberate.
  • The assurance for Canadian business, for
  • Canadians, is we will only sign a deal
  • that's the right deal that's a good deal
  • for Canada. We're representing Canada.

  • 22:03
  • Of course, there's pain in the short
  • term. Canada's auto, steel, aluminum,
  • and lumber sectors have taken hits, but
  • the broader economy so far, it's proving
  • resilient. According to CBC analysis,
  • GDP only fell by 0.1% in April 2025 and
  • may drop another 0.1% in May, far less
  • than early projections. Many Canadian
  • businesses imported goods ahead of
  • tariff deadlines, blunting immediate
  • shocks.
  • And thanks to KSMA, over 90% of crossber
  • trade still moves with minimal tariffs.
  • The average effective rate remains
  • around 2.3%.
  • for now. That said, the situation is
  • fragile. If the US imposes a 35% blanket
  • tariff on August 1st, as Trump has
  • threatened, the real stress test will
  • begin.
  • But even so, this moment offers clarity.
  • Canada is facing a structural challenge
  • and responding not with panic, but with

  • 23:02
  • strategy.
  • In Trump's world, countries line up,
  • sign fast, and pay up. Canada isn't
  • doing that. And it's not because it
  • lacks options. It's because it's
  • choosing not to play that game. Carney's
  • refusal to rush is risky, but it's also
  • calculated he's betting that protecting
  • national interest, even at the cost of
  • short-term pain, will serve Canada
  • better than folding under pressure. The
  • US may not see Canada as a priority. But
  • that doesn't mean Canada is without
  • power. It just means the path forward is
  • longer and requires patience. Because in
  • this trade war, waiting might be the
  • boldest move of all.


SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.