image missing
Date: 2025-10-05 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00028948
UKRAINE WAR
GOING AFTER RUSSIAN SUPPLY CHAIN

PPR GLOBAL: Russia’s Supply Bridge to Crimea Is GONE –
$30K JDAM Bomb Just Shut Down $3B Main Railway Connection


Original article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcNIXRDvplg
Russia’s Supply Bridge to Crimea Is GONE – $30K JDAM Bomb Just Shut Down $3B Main Railway Connection PPR GLOBAL Jul 27, 2025 766K subscribers ... 399,793 views ... 8.9K likes #militarydevelopments #ukrainewarupdate #ukrainewar #ukrainewar #ukrainewarupdate #military #militarydevelopments #militarystrategy Ukraine’s Air Force has pulled off one of its most devastating precision strikes yet—destroying a key military bridge in the Zaporizhia region with JDAM-ER bombs launched from MiG-29 jets. This was no ordinary bridge; it was Russia’s primary southern logistics artery, connecting Crimea to the eastern front. Now, that link is gone. Ammunition convoys are halted. Fuel trucks are stranded. In this video, we unpack how this single attack triggered a cascade of logistical failure, from supply chain breakdowns to economic ripple effects in occupied Crimea. You’ll learn:
  • How MiG-29s were retrofitted to fire U.S.-made JDAM bombs
  • Why the Karachokrak crossing was more than just a bridge
  • The real-time impact on Russian armored units, fuel deliveries, and air logistics
  • How Ukraine is creating a systematic campaign to collapse Russia’s supply network
  • And why this might be the beginning of a strategic siege on Crimea itself
Every bridge destroyed is not just a structure lost—it’s an entire battalion immobilized. Don’t forget to subscribe, leave your thoughts in the comments, and turn on notifications for more deep-dive war intelligence.
Peter Burgess COMMENTARY



Peter Burgess
Transcript
  • 0:00
  • Russia's southern front plans were
  • thrown into disarray by a single bombing
  • order. The Ukrainian air force destroyed
  • a vital border crossing in Zaparizia
  • with Jdam er bombs dropped from Mig 29s.
  • This crossing was not just a bridge. It
  • was the military backbone connecting
  • Crimea, Marupole and Denipro. Now that
  • backbone has been broken. Munition
  • shipments have stopped. Fuel convoys
  • have been cut off. The Kremlin's summer
  • offensive collapsed before it even
  • began. Can Russia compensate for this
  • setback? On July 7, a Ukrainian MiG 29
  • fighter jet targeted a vital Russian
  • crossing point over the Karachukra River
  • in the Zapperia region. This bridge was
  • no ordinary structure. Although not the
  • main branch of the Denipro River, it
  • served as a key link in the Russian
  • army's supply chain on the southern
  • front. Heavy fuel tankers, trucks loaded
  • with ammunition, and armored repair
  • convoys regularly cross this crossing
  • every day, feeding the logistics line
  • stretching from Tokmack to Mel Toppel

  • 1:00
  • and from there to Crimea via Kinburn.
  • This route, considered an alternative to
  • the Kirch Bridge, was critical for the
  • transfer of cargo to eastern ports in
  • particular. In the spring, Russia built
  • a temporary but structurally sound
  • military bridge over the carer crack to
  • reinforce this route. Supported by
  • concrete slabs, this structure allowed
  • heavy vehicles to safely cross the
  • marshy ground. An average of 230
  • vehicles used this route daily with
  • onethird of them directly supplying
  • ammunition to the front lines. The
  • remaining transportation handled fuel
  • and food logistics. This is precisely
  • why Ukraine did not hesitate in its
  • target selection. The attack was not a
  • conventional air operation, but was
  • carried out using two GBU62 bombs
  • equipped with advanced JDAM ER guidance
  • kits. These bombs were modernized
  • versions of the US produced 1,000 lb
  • MK83. Thanks to the GPS guided kit added
  • to the tail section and the deployed
  • flaps, these bombs can reach a range of

  • 2:01
  • over 70 km and hit targets with accuracy
  • of just a few meters. Normally,
  • Soviet-designed MiG 29s were not
  • equipped with the necessary interface to
  • use these bombs, but Ukraine introduced
  • Western munitions to these aircraft with
  • a special adaptation kit developed in
  • Lviv. The pilot can now see the range
  • and targeting data of NATO inventoried
  • smart weapons on the cockpit display.
  • This transforms an old jet into a modern
  • precision strike platform. As a result
  • of the attack, the temporary military
  • bridge was completely disabled. One of
  • the factors that made the attack so
  • effective was not only the precision of
  • the munitions used, but also the
  • systematic air defense suppression
  • operation carried out prior to the
  • operation. In particular, the Russian
  • army's buck M2 medium-range air defense
  • systems deployed in the region were
  • disabled by successive suppression of
  • enemy air defenses attacks in recent
  • weeks. Despite having an effective radar
  • lock range of up to 45 km, these systems
  • were either detected and destroyed or

  • 3:00
  • rendered blind due to their radar
  • frequencies being jammed. As a result,
  • Ukraine's MiG 29s were able to advance
  • through an open air corridor as they
  • approached the range to launch JDM
  • bombs. The second and less talked about
  • effect of the operation was not limited
  • to the destruction of the bridge. This
  • bridge was not just a crossing point. It
  • also served as a buffer zone, masking
  • the logistics hub of the Russian 35th
  • Corps on the eastern bank. Hidden behind
  • the fog of war, this staging area was
  • now exposed and vulnerable. Satellite
  • imagery and heat signature data indicate
  • that smoke rose from three separate camp
  • areas shortly after the attack. This
  • likely indicates secondary explosions in
  • ammunition or fuel depots. Following the
  • attack, the eastern ramp of the bridge
  • was completely collapsed into the sea
  • with concrete blocks blocking the inner
  • roadway. This structural collapse not
  • only stopped traffic but also wiped
  • Russia's critical supply route from

  • 4:00
  • Marupople to Crimea off the map.
  • They now have to detour from Tokmack to
  • Berdansk to reach the east of the
  • Denipro. But this new route means an
  • additional 160 km and a loss of time.
  • Moreover, this secondary route is
  • extremely unfavorable in terms of both
  • geography and infrastructure. Consisting
  • of a narrow strip of earth, this passage
  • quickly turns to mud, especially during
  • summer rains. In such conditions, heavy
  • fuel trucks could get stuck on the road
  • with their wheels sinking into the mud.
  • This is not merely a physical
  • disruption, but a collapse of the
  • logistics chain because the fuel needed
  • to reach the tank's tank is being used
  • to charge a satellite phone used to call
  • for a crane. On the military side,
  • another panic has emerged. After the
  • bridge was hit, Ukraine demonstrated
  • that its longrange Jummy AR munitions
  • could easily strike the rear of the
  • front lines, forcing the Russian air
  • force to respond urgently. SU30SM

  • 5:02
  • fighter jets were moved to the vicinity
  • of Malito and day and night patrol
  • flights were launched on the Vasilivka
  • Maltool line. But these aircraft cannot
  • fly above 4,000 m to avoid entering the
  • radar range of Ukraine's Patriot systems
  • which are equipped with AIM120 AMRAM
  • missiles. This limits both their field
  • of view and their attack position. There
  • are patrol flights, but there is no real
  • threat of a raid or suppression. The
  • S400 air defense batteries are scattered
  • in a rather haphazard manner against
  • this new threat. According to data
  • obtained from satellite images, these
  • batteries are mounted on temporary ramps
  • that are constantly being moved rather
  • than being placed in fixed positions.
  • The aim is to prevent the destruction of
  • all radar and command units with a
  • single hit. This portability brings with
  • it another problem. The radars cannot
  • operate at the optimum altitude. In
  • addition, Russian defense forces have
  • deployed CRBN masking systems to make it

  • 6:00
  • more difficult for JDAM ER munitions to
  • target them. These systems reduce
  • visibility by deflecting radar signals
  • rather than suppressing them, but this
  • appears to have seriously slowed down
  • coordination and the chain of command on
  • the ground. The impact of the attack has
  • been much deeper and more multifaceted
  • than meets the eye. With the bridge out
  • of commission, the Russian command
  • realized that it could not reinforce its
  • front lines in Marupole with BMP3
  • armored vehicles which were running on
  • low fuel reserves. With the road link
  • cut off, the solution shifted to air
  • transport. The first reflex was to
  • deploy ill 76 military transport
  • aircraft. These flights via Kirch
  • carried spare engine parts, sets of
  • tracks, and emergency ammunition. But
  • this method created two major problems.
  • First, large targets such as the IL76
  • are very easy to detect by western radar
  • systems, which means that the risk of
  • air defense is immediately sky-high. The
  • second is economic. Each ton transported
  • by IL76 costs three times as much as the

  • 7:03
  • same load transported by truck. The
  • cargo carried by Russia's logistics
  • network on its southern front is no
  • longer limited to ammunition and fuel.
  • The Ministry of Agricultures seasonal
  • supply line from Dombas to Crimea has
  • also been directly affected. Trucks
  • traveling along this route transported
  • grain, vegetables, meat products, and
  • milk to food warehouses in Crimea,
  • returning with empty pallets, crates,
  • and waste packaging. But the destruction
  • of the temporary bridge over the carer
  • crack disrupted the two-way flow of this
  • route. In particular, large refrigerated
  • trailers are now forced to take a 160 km
  • detour via Berdansk as an alternative
  • route. Fuel consumption for trucks on
  • this new route has nearly doubled.
  • Logistics companies can no longer afford
  • these extra costs. Many subcontractors
  • have started to report losses. Civilian
  • suppliers are directly sending invoices
  • to the government, stating, 'If prices
  • on the shelves in Crimea do not increase
  • by 18%, we cannot cover these costs.
  • What moves could Russia make in response

  • 8:01
  • to the bridg's destruction? One of the
  • most likely options is to disable the
  • Patriot batteries in Ukraine. To do
  • this, Moscow theoretically has KH59
  • air-to-surface missiles at its disposal.
  • But in practice, things are not so
  • simple. The US Norwegian-made Nemesis
  • electronic warfare system deployed west
  • of Kharkiv confuses guided missiles such
  • as the KH59 with GPS jamming signals. It
  • spreads across the field. These missiles
  • need American satellite data to find
  • their targets. But Nemesis distorts
  • directional information, so the missiles
  • often veer off into empty fields or are
  • shot down before they can turn back.
  • This means that the first option is
  • systematically doomed to failure. The
  • second option is to launch a salvo of
  • caliber NK missiles from the Black Sea
  • fleet at the Odessa Bilharod
  • Dinistrovski line. The aim here is not a
  • direct hit, but to put pressure on the
  • Patriot systems radar and optical
  • sensors. The missile threat would jam
  • the radars and slow down the defense
  • response. But this also looks stronger
  • on paper. This is because Kaliba

  • 9:01
  • missiles are already assigned to more
  • priority defense areas such as the Kirch
  • Bridge, Novarosis, and Vulgrad. Each
  • caliber missile is expensive and there
  • are few of them. Therefore, rather than
  • spending its caliber stockpile to gain
  • limited psychological superiority, the
  • Kremlin is focused on shaping its
  • defense against the JDAM ER threat
  • because what they have realized is that
  • an American bomb can cause much more
  • damage than a missile range test from
  • the Soviet era. The Ukrainian side is
  • preparing for the second phase
  • immediately after the first strike. The
  • number of MiG 29s carrying JDAM ER
  • munitions has now exceeded 18. Thanks to
  • newly developed wing pylon adapters,
  • each aircraft can carry two GBU62 bombs
  • in a single sorty. This creates an
  • operational multiplier effect. More
  • destruction with fewer flights. The
  • target list has already been finalized.
  • One option is the suspension towers of
  • the Kirch Bridge. The other is the
  • Marupople railway vioaduct. Both are of
  • both symbolic and strategic importance.

  • 10:00
  • When the munition's payload reaches
  • 2,000 lb, the destruction threshold for
  • such fixed structures is easily
  • surpassed.
  • Western experts are quite clear about
  • this attack concept. This package,
  • whether it's a radar tower or a bridge
  • pier within range, will hit its target
  • with pinpoint accuracy when the right
  • coordination is in place. Ukraine,
  • meanwhile, is preparing to use this
  • precision to systematically dismantle
  • Russia's logistics and transportation
  • infrastructure.
  • More interestingly, the question arises
  • whether new Jamie will replace the
  • existing stock. The Pentagon has
  • committed to delivering an additional
  • 900 units to Ukraine by the end of 2025.
  • This means that Kiev now has not just a
  • few munitions at its disposal, but the
  • capacity to carry out a planned
  • campaign. The calculation on the
  • strategic table is as follows. If we
  • strike one bridge per week, Kirch will
  • be under psychological siege before
  • summer ends. The targets on the map have
  • already been marked. Alternative routes
  • for armored convoys have been nearly

  • 11:00
  • eliminated. Russia's asphalt and railway
  • network is being cornered further with
  • each strike. On the countermeasure
  • front, there is a plan being carried out
  • in a hurry. Sue 30 SM fighter jets are
  • being integrated with made Kibinu
  • electronic jammers. But there is a
  • serious problem here. The software is
  • not ready. The target date for the
  • updated Jammer software to be put into
  • active service is the end of the year.
  • Until then, the Russian military's fuel
  • and ammunition transportation will have
  • to race against the clock and navigate
  • every millimeter like a minefield
  • through the sunken passages of the
  • Nippro. The most notable balancing
  • factor in Ukraine's latest bridge
  • destruction attack is the new core
  • structure of its air defense system,
  • Patriot batteries. The US has quietly
  • increased Ukraine's Patriot capacity to
  • three batteries through shipments from
  • Poland's rush of air logistics hub. Two
  • of these are the latest PAC 3 MSE
  • variant while the third is the GEMT
  • which provides broader coverage. This
  • combination provides not only point
  • defense but also sufficient range for

  • 12:01
  • regional threat suppression. Positioned
  • to protect the Zaparigia front. These
  • systems create an electronic umbrella
  • that provides maneuvering space for the
  • Ukrainian air force. When MiG 29s
  • carrying JDAM take off from this Patriot
  • coverage area and launch their
  • munitions, an interesting tactical chain
  • begins. The Russian side seeking to
  • intercept the launched JDAM is forced to
  • fire S300/400
  • series SAM systems as a counter measure,
  • but the radar emissions and launch fire
  • from these systems are directly visible
  • on the Patriot radar image. When the
  • S400 comes into play, US-made PAC3MS
  • missiles can instantly detect these
  • threats. This tactic is known in
  • military literature as forcing a
  • stalemate. Ukraine is forcing Russian
  • air defenses to make a decision. Either
  • fire the missile and risk being
  • destroyed by the Patriot MSE or remain
  • silent and watch the strategic bridge
  • collapse.
  • The S400 battery did not fire in this

  • 13:02
  • attack because if it had, it would have
  • faced the risk of an out-ofrange
  • intercept, i.e. missile loss or a
  • patriot counterattack. Result: The
  • bridge collapsed. This is a new
  • nightmare for the Kremlin. Now it's not
  • just about focusing on the target. They
  • must also calculate the risk of exposing
  • their systems, missile waste, and radar
  • positions with every shot. Don't be
  • surprised if new JDM images appear on
  • your screens in the coming days because
  • every explosion destroys not just a
  • target but also a supply network that
  • has been woven over weeks. Sometimes
  • destroying a bridge is enough to
  • immobilize an entire brigade. The carer
  • crack pass was precisely that breaking
  • point. How do you think Moscow will
  • compensate for this blow? Will it open a
  • new transit route, bring its air defense
  • forward, or pursue a completely
  • 13:48
  • different strategy? We look forward to
  • your comments below. Don't forget to
  • subscribe and turn on notifications
  • because in this war, a single GPS
  • coordinate can change the fate of an
  • entire front. Thank you for watching.


SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.