image missing
Date: 2025-08-21 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00028918
US POLITICS
ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Must Pay Another $2,700 for Met Gala Dress
She made a splash in 2021 with her “Tax the Rich” dress.


Original article: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/25/nyregion/aoc-met-gala-dress.html
Ocasio-Cortez Must Pay Another $2,700 for Met Gala Dress Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez made a splash in 2021 with her “Tax the Rich” dress. Then the House Ethics Committee opened an investigation. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez at the Met Gala. She is wearing a white gown with the words “TAX THE RICH” in red letters on the back. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, center, on the red carpet at the Met Gala in 2021.Credit...Nina Westervelt for The New York Times Nicholas Fandos By Nicholas Fandos July 25, 2025 Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez made a splash when she arrived at the 2021 Met Gala in a designer dress with “Tax the Rich” emblazoned across the back. Four years later, she is still settling the bill. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat and leader of her party’s progressive wing, personally paid about $1,000 to rent the dress and accessories. But in a report released on Friday, the bipartisan House Ethics Committee concluded her initial payment had fallen short of the fair market rate, violating House rules. While the committee found no reason to believe that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez was trying to stiff the vendors, it wrote that “it would be appropriate” for her to pay an additional $2,733.28 to cover what it determined was the full value of her outfit. The panel also urged the congresswoman to make a $250 donation to the Met’s Costume Institute, the beneficiary of the star-studded annual gala, to cover the cost of a meal for her partner, Riley Roberts, who accompanied her. Once she did, the panel would close the yearslong investigation, it said. “While the committee did not find that Representative Ocasio-Cortez’s violations were knowing and willful, she nonetheless received impermissible gifts and must bear responsibility for the other conduct that occurred with respect to the delays in payment,” the 31-page report said. Mike Casca, the congresswoman’s chief of staff, stressed that the committee noted she had tried to comply with House rules. Still, he said she would personally take responsibility for the outstanding balance. “She accepts the ruling and will remedy the remaining amounts, as she’s done at each step in this process,” he said. The annual event at the Metropolitan Museum of Art is a global spectacle often called the Oscars of fashion. The evening is overseen by Anna Wintour, Vogue’s global editorial director, and tickets cost $35,000 a piece. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, 35, attracted international attention when she attended in fall 2021. Typically, attendees are dressed in custom-made garments at the expense of the designer, who often also covers the cost of admission. However, House ethics rules prevent members of Congress from accepting gifts such as “a gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance or other item having monetary value.” Lawmakers and their spouses are permitted to attend charity events, but only if invited by the organization hosting the event. In this case, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and Mr. Roberts were guests of Ms. Wintour and allowed to attend. Investigators said that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and her staff had been mindful of the rules and were determined to pay for her gown and related costs incurred by the designer, Aurora James, and her company, Brother Vellies. Rather than simply accepting the dress as a gift, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez asked to “rent” it and personally cover other costs associated with the evening. But investigators who began looking at the matter in 2022 found that despite “significant” attempts to comply with the gift rules, the congresswoman and her staff fell short. There were delayed payments, in some cases until after the investigation began. The committee found evidence that the designer “may have lowered costs” in response to questions from the congresswoman’s aide. Her case presented the committee with an unusual challenge. The report noted that while her staff asked vendors to “keep costs down,” her lawyer told them that “it proved to be exceptionally difficult to educate vendors on the ethical requirements that the congresswoman is subject to.” The lawyer told the committee that her team was repeatedly told, “‘Met Gala attendees don’t normally pay for this.’” Ms. Ocasio-Cortez initially paid about $990.76 to rent the gown, shoes, a handbag, jewelry and a floral hairpiece. But the committee conducted its own analysis and concluded the fair market value was far higher. The dress would have cost $18,837.30 to buy, it said, so the rental value was $2,976.29. Other costs brought the total due to $3,724.04, according to the committee. “Representative Ocasio-Cortez’s attempt to apply a retail rental cost to a handmade couture gown was unrealistic,” the report said. Nicholas Fandos is a Times reporter covering New York politics and government. See more on: Met Gala, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, House Committee on Ethics, U.S. Politics The Latest on the Trump Administration
  • Trump’s Trip to Scotland: President Trump has headed to Scotland for a five-day visit, for what will be a mix of personal business and diplomacy. Before his 2016 election, he correctly predicted that the forces animating Brexit would go beyond the United Kingdom. But now most Britons say Brexit was a mistake.
  • Acting U.S. Attorney in New Jersey: Alina Habba’s tenure as interim U.S. attorney was slated to end, but the Trump administration’s appointment will allow her to remain the top law enforcement official in the state.
  • Gabbard’s Attacks on Obama: The effort by Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, to repair her standing with the president has placed the already embattled Attorney General Pam Bondi in a nearly untenable position.
  • Illinois Sanctuary Measures: A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit, filed in the early days of Trump’s term, in which the Justice Department argued that state and local officials were violating the Constitution by enforcing so-called sanctuary measures that limit cooperation with immigration agents.
  • Sewage Release Into Tijuana River: The United States and Mexico signed an agreement to end the flow of raw sewage into the river, which crosses the border into California and for years has contaminated and closed beaches and caused illnesses in both countries.
  • D.E.I.-Related Grants: The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to allow the National Institutes of Health to cancel millions of dollars in grants linked to diversity initiatives.
How We Report on the Trump Administration Hundreds of readers asked about our coverage of the president. Times editors and reporters responded to some of the most common questions. Editors’ Picks
  • ‘The Fantastic Four: First Steps’ Review: A Newborn Franchise
  • An Art Hub Surrounded by Fjords and Forests
  • Rock’s Legends Were Messy. You’d Never Know That From Today’s Movies.

Peter Burgess COMMENTARY



Peter Burgess


SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.