Could Epstein Files Cost Trump? | Christiane Amanpour Presents
Christiane Amanpour Presents: The Ex Files
Premiered Jul 22, 2025
45K subscribers ... 190,377 views
Christiane Amanpour Presents:
The Ex Files with Jamie Rubin
The row over The Epstein Files is one that President Trump is still struggling to shake off. But just how damaging is it for his credibility, and where does his disappointed MAGA base turn next? Christiane and Jamie analyse whether Trump is going to suffer long-term damage from this scandal, and wonder whether the Files will ever be released in full.
Christiane also points out the irony of Trump - one of the most prominent purveyors of conspiracy theories in the last decade - now being criticised by the same supporters who have gladly peddled his conspiracies for the last few years. Plus Christiane and Jamie trace the history of these theories in the US, right back to the 1960s and conspiracies around JFK's assassination and the CIA.
They also react to Trump's recent decision to sell more US weapons to Ukraine, and Christiane issues her strongest call yet for an end to the Gaza War, and the slaughter of innocent civilians, plus the return of the hostages.
For more content, please follow us:
Watch us: / @amanpourpod
Instagram: / amanpourpod
X: https://x.com/AmanpourPod
Facebook: / christiane-amanpour-presents
BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/amanpourpod....
Contact us at: amanpourpod@global.com
#news #christianeamanpour #interview #politics #podcast #trump #epsteinfiles
Christiane Amanpour Presents: The Ex Files with Jamie Rubin
Transcript
- 0:00
- I have to say that as we sit here and um faf around about how we're going to start Jamie, I cannot believe we're
- talking about Epstein. Uh I have not been into it as a, you know,
- international anchor. I haven't been really paying that much attention thinking it's just a typical crazy MAGA
- US conspiracy theory uh Russion that will soon blow over. But clearly it
- hasn't blown over. So, we're going to um do what we can on various issues around
- it uh in this episode. Here's our take on it.
- So this week we're going to ask Yep. we are diving into the Epstein uh situation
- and we're going to ask not to go over the nitty-gritty of what's been dominating the media for the last week
- or more, but what does the focus on this mean in terms of our wheelhouse, which
- is foreign policy, and how we actually keep the focus on a lot of other things that matter as well. And more
- 1:04
- importantly, for those who have extreme views of Donald Trump, whether pro or or against, is this something that is going
- to affect him in the short, medium, and long term? All those who dislike Donald
- Trump are hoping that this collapses him and it's the one thing um that he can't get over. all those who really like him
- are hoping that this is going to blow over and he's going to survive this like he survived just about every other, you
- know, slings and arrows and darts and and charges and cases that have come his way. Um, so we're also going to be
- looking beyond that into the rise of conspiracy theories more generally from QAnon, Pizzagate, uh, even the
- assassination of JFK. And later in the program, we will return to our wheelhouse and we'll ask where exactly
- is the Ukraine uh situation right now? Where has Trump gone on this? Is it sufficient that he's turned a little bit
- 2:01
- frustrated with Russia? And most importantly as well, what about the Israel Gaza war? Every time we look at a
- newspaper, look online, do some reporting, we see that it's getting worse and worse for the people of Gaza
- with no end in sight and no hostages being returned. So, let's get started.
- Hello everyone and welcome to Cristiano presents the XFiles with
- Jamie Rubin. I'm a senior official in the State Department. I was under
- President Biden and I also was under President Clinton. and I've been a longtime foreign correspondent for CNN
- and I now host my own show where I interview world leaders on all sorts of issues and relevant people but I haven't
- yet done it on Epstein in my uh in my program on CNN and I wasn't going to do
- it but here we are because it is dominating the news and to an extent
- international uh news as well. So part one of our conversation, where are we
- 3:03
- today as we record? I thought this was going to blow over. A lot of people did.
- It's true that a lot of MAGA base have come back to Trump because they don't want to see their, you know, their
- emblem grievously wounded, but it's also true that Trump can't get past this yet. to
- the to the point that as we speak overnight Jamie he has posted a blizzard
- but I mean a blizzard unlike many that we've seen before on truth social on everything except for this on trivial
- stuff on stuff that he wants people to focus on after his six months in in office just a blizzard to try to change
- the subject but it doesn't seem to be changing that's Donald Trump's uh actually his
- strength is by constantly and repeatedly and in a dramatic way talking about
- every single thing that happens in the world. He keeps uh the media and the world moving to the next subject time
- 4:00
- after time after time and the specifics of any one subject get lost in the in
- the mess. And that is the horror of Trumpism where uh substance is lost.
- It's all about what Donald Trump thinks today, what President Trump thinks tomorrow. And that's how he hopes to
- change the subject. But it may not be working in this case. So I have to say as a journalist I just
- want to pay tribute to the actual journalists over the years and it started in the mid uh you know two
- 2010s. In other words, around 2008, a phenomenal journalist by the name of Julie Brown, working for the
- investigative uh team at the Miami Herald basically broke the scandal
- around the Epstein story in which she discovered that he had used all his
- contacts in in in in the law, in amongst prosecutors, in business, in all sorts
- of things to pretty much get a a pretty lenient sentence. The first time around
- he was allowed to plea to uh and I'm going to get this right. He was allowed to plea to um two counts of
- 5:07
- prostitution, one with a minor, which essentially was essentially got him an
- 18month uh jail sentence which was a very very also in itself a lenient jail
- sentence because as Julie Brown reports, he essentially got him got his chauffeer to pick him pick him up from the Miami
- jail every day and bring him back at 10 p.m. at night. he spent the night at jail, but was able to pretty much live a
- um a de, you know, a free life. So, she's the one who reopened this case and
- put it on the map also by going after the testimony of the victims and that
- was incredibly incredibly powerful. And then it moved to New York and then we know what happened. He got a much
- stiffer sentence. He went to jail and during Trump's first term he committed
- suicide in jail and that started the really important sticky
- 6:04
- I don't think we know whether he committed suicide that's one of the issues actually the conspiracy theorists that are
- generating that's conspiracy theorists but there's been so I just don't think we know
- that he was murdered we assume it but it's that's one of the issues Look,
- but that's one of the issues amongst the conspiracy theorists and that's why we're discussing this today. I don't know. You're not a conspiracy theorist,
- are you? No, I'm not. But we're trying to address the fact that conspiracy theorists were
- behind the Trump presidency and they are upset by the way he's handled Epstein precisely because they don't think that
- Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide. I assume he did. I don't know any better. But uh the issue is to what extent were
- uh Jeffrey Epstein's information uh suppressed and that's where we get to the question of journalism. To me you've
- given credit to one journalist and they deserve credit but there journalism is and to all the journalists who then
- 7:02
- followed that reporting absolutely all of them deserve credit but journalism is one of the most important
- elements of a democracy. Thomas Jefferson said it's the most important of the uh bill of rights, the freedom of
- the press. So that means we hold journalists to a high standard and I hold them to a high standard and I think
- in the current situation they are not meeting that standard and I'll tell you why. Um there is an author who's won uh
- awards for a national magazine award, who's written books, who was a regular on national television and quoted widely
- in journalistic mainstream media, who's suddenly not able to publish, not able
- to appear on television, not able to tell the world what he knows. And that's a man named Michael Wolf who says that
- he uh interviewed Jeffrey Epstein for a hundred hours of tapes that he's got on
- tape of Jeffrey Epstein talking uh about himself to try to get Michael Wolf to
- 8:00
- write about him. But in those tapes, that is official. Those are tapes. This isn't hearsay. This is someone who's got
- it on tape who says, and two things about it jumped out at me when I listened to Jeffrey Epstein discussed by
- Michael Wolf. one uh that he believes that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump
- were the best of friends, that each of them was their best friend over their lives because of what they did during
- the 80s and 90s, chasing women, hanging out in fancy parties, flying planes,
- making money, all of that. That's interesting to me that the man, as as Wolf puts it, who's considered the worst
- person on the planet, Jeffrey Epstein, who ended up thinking that Donald Trump was worse than him. That's interesting.
- And you know that because you you heard that in the tape. I heard uh Michael Wolf describe his 100
- hours of conversation. Michael Wolf was good enough to go on television over and
- over again during previous eras on mainstream media across the board. But
- 9:01
- when it comes to this subject, he himself says he can't get attention. He was interviewed by David Remnick, the
- editor of the New Yorker magazine. I listened to it. Um, and he says one
- thing, what I just said about best friends, and two, he says that Jeffrey Epstein showed him pictures uh that he
- was keeping in his safe because Donald Trump and he had broken and that these were embarrassing pictures. these were
- pictures that were embarrassing to Donald Trump and that's why he kept them in his safe and that those pictures were
- taken by the FBI in 2018 and that they give the only plausible explanation I
- can see for this confusion where prior to office Donald Trump wanted everything
- released and now they don't. Okay, so let me ask you this. Let me ask you this because this is the Fiori,
- right? That Trump ran and all the well, a lot of the people who populate his
- cabinet and his deputies like the deputy FBI, uh, Bonino, like Pam Bondi, like a
- 10:00
- whole bunch of people, uh, ran with this Epstein conspiracy. A, the client list,
- which now Pam Bondi, the AG, says doesn't exist, that it was on her desk, she said, for review, but now she says
- there was no client list or at least there's no there there. Bonjino, the deputy FBI uh uh director who was a
- podcaster, went on and and and also really ramped up this conspiracy theory,
- went on Fox uh at the height of this and was quite tearful and he said, you know,
- now that I'm part of a cabinet, I actually have to do things that are considered best for my country. and as
- as as a way to to try to dodge MAGA fire because MAGA is saying how come you guys
- said that you were going to you know unleash all this stuff and now you say there's no there there and then the
- other question which which people have raised uh is that if these
- whatever pictures documents whatever you're saying Michael Wolf has were in the possession of the FBI they were
- 11:02
- there since 2018 that means they were there during the Biden administration why Wouldn't the Biden administration in
- some way or another have used them for their own political uh That's easy to answer, Christian. That's
- easy. The Biden administration uh adopted the normal procedure for a president and a justice department. And
- that is to not interfere, to not tell them what to do, to not act like the FBI
- and the Justice Department or just lawyers who work for the president can do whatever he says. In fact, Joe Biden
- gave Merrick Garland, the uh attorney general, a pretty wide swath. So much so
- that Garland uh is the person Biden most regrets hiring because he gave such a
- wide swath and didn't do many things that people in the Democratic party thought were appropriate, namely begin
- the prosecution of the January 6th protest against our government when an
- attempt was made to interfere with our government by taking over the Capitol
- building. And he didn't investigate that. He didn't pursue that. He didn't do that until Congress led by some brave
- 12:06
- leaders including uh Liz Cheney on the Republican side and other Democrats on the who had hearings in which they
- demonstrated for all to see the crimes that were committed on January 6. So that was Garland's approach to the
- Justice Department. So it's not it's very easy to explain why Joe Biden didn't order the release of damaging
- photographs of Donald Trump because he didn't abuse his power. He didn't use government as a tool to uh to you know
- penalize those who who's against him and support those who are for him. That's not what government is designed to do.
- Can we also the justice department Okay. You've described Michael Wolf
- saying that there are at least one, you know, embarrassing picture. He said to David Remnick it was around a pool, you
- know, uh and and whatever. But you're not saying because maybe that's why the
- Justice Department didn't do anything with it under Biden that there's anything illegal. It might be, you use the word embarrassing.
- 13:05
- That's right. Uh but here's the point. Um the campaign manager, Steve Bannon,
- essentially the campaign strategist, uh when he met Jeffrey Epstein, and this was reported again by Michael Wolf
- because he was there when they met. And uh Steve Bannon said to Jeffrey Epstein, 'The only thing I was worried about in
- the 2016 campaign was you and what you could do to Donald Trump.' There is
- something that people in the Trump uh uh orbit are extremely worried about. I I
- don't know what it is. Michael Wolf says it's these pictures among other things. And all I can say is why suddenly the
- people that demanded government release all these information about Jeffrey Epstein, why suddenly they're saying
- they can't. And I think Jeffrey Epstein's explanation and Michael Wolf's
- explanation is the first plausible one I've heard that there are embarrassing pictures about Donald Trump that they
- 14:02
- don't want to release. Now just to be clear and and I know this
- but also David Remnik you know brought it up in a in a friendly but journalistic you know account holding
- way. He said to Michael Wolf in his interview he said look Michael you have also faced quite a lot of controversy in
- your in your writing. He wrote four books on Trump. I think one was called
- fire and fury. The other one was called siege and then couple of others whose names I've forgotten. But of course, a
- lot of the details have been vigorously disputed, notably by the Trump uh Trump and his allies. But that's one of the
- reasons why in this moment he's probably finding it difficult to tell his
- But here we have an easy answer to that. It's on tape. These are tapes, editors.
- And that's what he says. We haven't heard the right. So it's easy to figure out whether there's something false about
- his charges, his claims, his assertions. listen to the tapes, 100 hours of them.
- 15:03
- Figure out whether it's really Jeffrey Epstein on the tape and we can do that. There's voice of Jeffrey Epstein in
- court. Uh technology can confirm whether this is really him. Listen to the tapes. Then let's make our judgment. That's my
- point here is that somehow in this case I believe the major media are afraid and
- let's address why. CBS, one of the most powerful institutions in our country.
- They uh own uh 60 Minutes, something you used to work for, one of the the most
- most uh respected news organizations in the country. Uh had to uh bend the knee
- to Donald Trump by agreeing to pay money for not doing anything wrong, just reporting what was said in two different
- ways, both of which were said, and they paid off them off. This was about the
- interview that 60 Minutes did as they do generally with all presidential candidates with Kamala Harris and Donald
- 16:01
- Trump actually refused to sit for 60 Minutes and then he accused them of manipulating the tape. So yes, and then
- there's the ABC payment and then there's the pulling of funding for NPR and PBS the public broadcast. There's a lot
- there's a lot of pressure. There's a lot. So I believe that I'm watching what happens in a my country when people are
- afraid. Even the major news organizations become afraid. I had
- experiences myself like this where I was talking to law firms about possibly being an associate in some way and it
- happened s shortly after Donald Trump went after the law firms and I watched normally sensible leaders of law firms
- go oh I don't know whether I can talk to you a Democrat I can't talk to you about
- a job right now the the fear is real in our country that's true you heard Lisa Macowski say
- it the senator from Alaska Republican senator That's from news organizations that are
- supposed to uh report without fear or favor. In the meantime, let's talk about
- 17:04
- troubles me. That's that's troubling and it should trouble everybody in a democracy. And let's just say that that trend is also
- giving comfort and aid and sucker to authoritarians and dictators and
- illiberal democrats around the world. They say, 'Oh, well, if the United States can do that to their journalists,
- well, we can certainly continue doing it to ours.' But Jamie, what about the Wall Street Journal? because it did go ahead
- and publish one of the latest bits of news about this and that was uh
- reportedly that Trump had had written a a a birthday message to Jeffrey Epstein
- um along with a I'm going to I'm going to quote here a boardy drawing of a
- naked woman uh that he sent for Epstein's 50th birthday. Um now Trump
- according to you know media reporters and others even tried to or even did
- 18:01
- call the editor-inchief of the Wall Street Journal to try to get it not reported. The Wall Street Journal did
- report it and now Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch which is you know talk about a
- cycle. My goodness me. I mean, Rupert Murdoch, who took his own network all
- the way to basically lying about the 2020 election and the voter, you know, machines and had to pay a gazillion, I
- mean, nearly a billion dollars um in restitution to one of those. It was called Dominion. The company is now
- being sued. Oh my god. I don't know where this ends, honestly.
- Well, let's address the whole thing underneath it in our next segment, which is, you know, how did we get to a point
- where conspiracy theories are so relevant to our politics? So, let's just play before we do that.
- Uh Trump so angry with MAGA uh voters who have been pushing him to to deliver
- on what he promised during the election, which is other in other words to to publish all the the so-called Epstein
- 19:03
- files. Um this is what he said to his own supporters. It was quite astonishing. I don't understand it why they would be
- so interested. He's dead for a long time. Uh he was never a big factor in
- terms of life. Uh I don't understand what the interest or what the fascination is. I don't understand why
- the Jeffrey Epste would be of interest to anybody. It's pretty boring stuff.
- It's sorted, but it's boring. Well, that was the the nice part of that then because he also called them all sorts of
- names like selfish and this and that and how can you not be concentrating on the
- great stuff that we've done in the first six months of this administration. And I think on that front we should uh just
- I'm going to read the latest poll because the Epstein story is a big liability. CBS Yuggov finds that 75% of
- Americans disapprove of the administration's handling of matters related to Epstein and 89% want the
- Justice Department to release all the information it has on the case which and that's that's probably why uh I I
- 20:08
- feel a little better this week which is when the polls move you find the cowardly politicians suddenly get more
- uh uh spine and maybe both on the Democratic side and the Republican side, seeing that the country is interested,
- the country won't penalize them for focusing on it. Maybe Democratic senators, Republican senators will lose
- their fear and gain their spines and begin to ask harder questions and demand
- answers and uh we can get just get this thing answered. You know, I served in in
- So, just quickly before we go to No, Jamie, because we're about to go to the next the next the next part, but
- answered. Okay. So, is Trump asking AG Pam Bondi, Attorney General Bondi to
- release grand jury testimony? Is that going to answer? No chance. That's very
- targeted and very simple stuff that is intended to avoid answering all the questions. That's another diversion. We
- 21:05
- heard Trump, as you said, wake up this morning and try to divert the world by talking about all sorts of other things.
- The grand jury testimony is another diversion. People want to know what's in the files. And uh one of the an author
- who's received uh accolades in journalism says there are embarrassing things in those files about Donald Trump
- who he says Jeffrey Epstein called his best friend or alluded to the fact that
- they were best friends and that that's significant. Jeffrey Epste and Donald Trump best friends. Uh that's
- interesting. That's worthy of news. That's worthy of investigation. And I hope the spine that Democratic and
- Republican senators gain will be uh also uh applied to the leaders of major news
- organizations who haven't shown much up to I I I will say one thing though. Uh the
- doodles, whatever you call them, the drawings that that Trump does do and has done over the years and has auctioned
- 22:00
- them for actually quite a lot of charity cases in New York in the early 2000s. They're pretty good. He's actually quite
- a good drawer. But that's not the point. Uh we're going to talk more about actually how Trump is a big conspiracy
- theorist himself. You remember uh he was the one who started the whole was Obama
- an American-born citizen all the rest of it the so-called birther conspiracy before the you know before that election
- or around that election. That's when we come back after a break. Okay, Jamie,
- this segment we're going to try to broaden out on the bigger part conspiracy theories have played most
- particularly in uh American history and politics and to an extent also around the world. But in the point question of
- how damaging could this be for Trump this Epstein, you know, kathuffle,
- let's play something that I think all of us were shocked by that Trump said and announced before he
- 23:00
- was elected the first time. I think it was in 2015 during the first election campaign. My people are so smart. And
- you know what else they say about my people? The polls. They say I have the most loyal people. Did you ever see that? where I could stand in the middle
- of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose any voters. Okay, it's like incredible.
- So, I'll never forget that he was quoting polls, but it was still and it's repeated over and over again this
- statement because up until now, Jamie, he has been teflon really to the extent
- that he was able to deflect everything that a any other politician probably
- would have been failed by and he was reelected. So, what do you think? I
- mean, I don't Do you think this is going to damage him? I don't know. Uh I don't know. I know
- that uh the MAGA base, so to speak, the leaders of the MAGA base, uh are
- starting to say some pretty aggressive things about Donald Trump. Uh you know, you've seen people like, uh Joe Rogan
- 24:00
- and others say things like, 'You're not the Pope, dude. You know, you still need to to be transparent. You need to tell
- the truth to us. Uh, you're not the Pope, bro. Is what Alex Jones said on his podcast. Um, that famous activist
- Laura Loomer uh has said that she thinks this could consume, quote, consume his
- presidency. Um, I don't know. Uh, but I know that the power of Trump flows
- directly from the loyalty of his base, which scares other Republicans from
- doing their jobs. And we've seen that over and over again. They're afraid of being primared, of being targeted by
- Trump. If he loses that power uh that politics uh is based on the power to
- scare his fellow Republicans and to some extent the Democrats, then uh it will
- change uh his presidency. Uh whether it will consume it or whether it makes him
- a lame duck or anything worse than that, I I kind of doubt. But I think it does
- 25:04
- reflect the fact that Donald Trump somehow took over the Republican party with these crazy conspiracy theories.
- They let him do it. They started changing all their policies across the board on foreign and domestic policy to
- satisfy Trump. Maybe they won't do that anymore. That will change American uh foreign and domestic policy. That will
- change the way our country operates if MAGA starts moving away from total
- loyalty to the president. And that's a big if because
- then who, by the way, who would be the next emblem for for MAGA? That may be what this is about is people
- looking beyond Trump. I don't know. So yeah, I'm I'm not sure that. Well, I'm not sure. Who knows? It's very very
- strange and fickle and beyond. But remember, let's talk about who these people are that power.
- Yes. But then let's talk about the big, you know, the big issue of conspiracy theories because to be fair, Trump did
- start, well, he was a huge proponent of some of these huge uh, you know, conspiracy
- 26:05
- theories like the endless what was it called? Birther the birther uh really
- foul accusations against Donald Trump against sorry uh Barack Obama suggesting
- that he had not well saying that he had not been born in the United States, that he was Kenyon. And I remember being at
- the White House correspondents dinner in whatever year it was, 2010, I think. Were you there too, Jamie? When Obama
- together? Yeah. Yeah. I was with ABC then. Um brought his and I actually actually we
- were on the table and I could see where Trump was. He was sitting with Lai Wemouth who was a
- friend of yours at the time. Um well still the daughter of the late K.
- Graham, who was the owner of the Washington Post, and she Trump was his
- her guest, and I remember being able to look straight down at him, and he was growing white and mottled when Obama
- 27:00
- really made fun of him. Yeah. And showed him the birth certificate. Finally, Obama had to bring out his birth certificate. But, you
- know, that stuff has a seriously corrosive corrosive
- uh influence because it never dies. And it and it just it just removes trust
- from any, you know, government official. And you know better than I do that the Clinton administration, the first
- Clinton administration was really plagued by so many conspiracy theories
- and special councils and I don't know what on things that turned out a lot of them to be just just that conspiracy
- theories and fake news. Nothing. So I think this is an interesting topic. I am not a an
- historian of American uh obsession Americans obsession with conspiracy
- theories. I obviously was born obviously I was born in 1960. The first conspiracy
- theory that I grew up with was John F. Kennedy's assassination and I actually
- believe that was caused a profound change in our country and the world
- 28:05
- because John F. Kennedy was so respected and loved by so many when he was shot
- and killed and people didn't believe that Lear V. Oswell did it alone. It
- destroyed a trust in government that had existed prior to that time. Throughout the 50s and certainly after World War II
- and during World War II, government, society, journalism, culture all had a
- certain unity based on the war, World War II, which brought our country together. And frankly, the the long uh
- twilight struggle with communism brought our country together with its excesses on both sides. But there was a unity. I
- believe that unity was destroyed by the conspiracy theories surrounding John F. Kennedy's assassination and everything
- that has flowed since that because once that happens, once you think maybe the vice president and the CIA conspired to
- kill their president, uh you lose trust in government. Guess what? That's a
- 29:04
- trust that can never be regained. And guess what? That was a nifty piece of Soviet disinformation. I just
- interviewed Tim Winer, you know, the the the the wonderful journalist who's been writing and chronicling about the CIA.
- He's got a new book called The Mission, and it's about the CIA post 911. And you remember there were conspiracy theories
- about that, too. Did did America cause 9, etc., etc. But on the Kennedy assassination, you know, of course this
- is FBI purview, but but a a majority of Americans at that time, tens of
- millions, he reminded me, uh basically believe still that the CIA killed JFK,
- which he explained was Soviet disinformation. If I'm not mistaken, they planted it in an Indian
- publication, the country of India. And from there it morphed and and and and and you know became absolutely um and
- and it was but it was it was the KGB who did it in 1967. And the KGB is very intelligent. They
- 30:03
- use intelligent sounding things. I learned this during my struggle on information warfare in the in the Biden
- administration. They connected the CIA to the mafia. And the mafia and the CIA
- were working together. They wanted to kill Castro. There was a split. They fought. The CIA wanted to fight the war
- in Vietnam. So they hired the mafia to kill JFK because Johnson would fight the
- war in Vietnam in a way I can't even keep up with this. Well, I I can because I saw, you know,
- dozens of movies about it, read dozens of books about it. And of course, that was as a young man something you
- couldn't help but listen to because you wanted to believe in the in the the glory of the Kennedy years, which I do
- and still believe in. And and they were destroyed. And I think the Bertha
- conspiracy, the Clinton conspiracies, all of these conspiracies uh are something that Hollywood uh is
- definitely a purveyor of. Movie after movie after movie is about government's
- 31:02
- perity, government's lying, government conspiracies to kill, to kill their
- opponents, to kill Americans, things that having worked in government for, you know, almost 16 years, you know, I
- consider impossible. uh but yet most people believe that I still often in my
- personal life run into very intelligent people and I have to persuade them that you know government couldn't do that
- because they couldn't get away with it you know that secrets can't be held and the sad thing is we we just finish
- on on on this the Kennedy thing because it's really unbelievable that all these years later it persists that it was the
- KGB who planted it in ' 67 but Wina likens it to a virus and I think that's
- really interesting you know it's the virus uh and in the absence of good
- journalistic reporting which we're getting drowned out now by all these influencers and social media and
- podcasters and this and that you know it's it's it's really difficult and in the absence of good governance by by
- 32:04
- officials too because sometimes there's bad governance and that leads and lends credibility to conspiracy theories and
- it obsesses people no end and you know of course the CIA and others have had
- plenty for us to obsess about all their interferences overseas and and coups and
- backing of, you know, military hunters and things like that. I mean, so the
- thing that I think is interesting about this one, the Epstein thing and all the other ones is it was kind of explained
- that a conspiracy theory is not just a lie. It's a kernel of truth or
- questioning that then becomes, you know, the obsession of people who believe that
- there's one rule for the elite and another rule for everybody else. That there's, you know, people in high places
- who, you know, help those who are in trouble sort of get out get out of
- 33:00
- trouble. And there there's there there are real reasons why people obsess about it. They they drag all these little
- threads out of a teeny kernel that they then, you know, they get led led to the
- led to the well, so to speak. What I find uh troubling and interesting and
- worthy of of consideration is the way in which social media and conspiracy
- theories merge their powers. Because prior to social media, the conspiracy
- theorists had trouble meeting each other, talking to each other, and building their own networks of of of
- conspiracy in the in the way in the exponential way that they can. But believe me, they really could even before,
- right? But but I I think you've used the word that I was making the point in the exponential way that they can now that
- the conspiracy theorists can find each other very easily on social media on uh
- you know going back for the last 20 years and that has built up both on the right and the left and more powerful
- 34:00
- more significant more uh you know unified theories of right and left
- conspiracy theories because they can meet each other and they can uh spin each other up and make things more
- significant. So those conspiracy theorists could find each other in the old days, but they weren't as
- significant. And since the social media uh era has damaged the uniformity of a
- set of facts that our country believes in, these right and left people can spin each other up. And that's why conspiracy
- theories have such an impact on our politics because they build the hatred by the right of the left and the left of
- the right. And that's troubles me and that's how it's exacerbated that hatred
- has been built up over many issues but the conspiracy theorists become the most intense like the ones who thought there
- was pizzay and the ones who all of that stuff. Yeah. And for some reason the modern conspiracy theorists are obsessed by
- pedophilia. Now it is really good for people to be really careful about it and
- 35:04
- clearly the you know the investigations and the trials have shown uh what the
- Epstein I mean his horrendous history with minors and his groomings and this and
- that. I mean absolutely horrendous and the victim's testimonies but that is something that really motivates a lot of
- modern conspiracy theories. for instance, as you just said, um the uh the Pizzagate thing and that was directed against Hillary Clinton. Um so
- it's it's just I don't know the answer. I just I really don't know the answer. I don't know whether there is an answer
- actually to somehow there's no answer to ending the conspiracy theory. The connection to our
- work in foreign affairs as you mentioned with the KGB is that in this era with these uh ability to get the right
- fighting the left, the left fighting the right, what the Russians have and the Chinese to some extent have learned how to do is to play into those animosities
- by finding good examples that fit those conspiracy theories and inserting them into the information domain. That's what
- 36:06
- I fought for two years at the State Department and it's very very difficult once those ideas are inserted into the
- information. The only way to fight them is to is to do two things. One, begin to
- talk to each other and listen to each other. Remember the freedom uh the
- freedom uh to to say what you want also in should include the freedom to listen.
- And one of the things we don't do anymore is listen to each other. We talk to each other very loudly, but the
- moment somebody's saying something you don't like, then you turn off. And I think that's one of the solutions is to
- teach kids and parents uh uh to teach their kids how to listen to each other.
- And my favorite story about this is from my friend Christo Gratzv, who's a journalist. I asked him what it was like
- to live in in communist Bulgaria and how did he survive when there were lies told to him all day long and told to the
- 37:02
- people all day long. And he told me, 'Well, when I grew up, my parents told me, whatever happens during the day, if
- something you hear and you're not sure what to think, ask us at the end of the day and we'll talk to you about it.' And
- that's how kids and families dealt with totalitarian uh extreme pressure to to
- conform. And I think it's what we need again today. Families need to talk to each other and and help kids sort out
- their their their thinking so that we can get back to a set of facts from which we're allowed to disagree over but
- what to do about it. But without the agreed facts as Daniel Patrick Morningington said you can have your
- opinions but you can't have your own facts. And one of the ways conspiracy
- theories have ruined our country is because people now do have their own facts. They certainly do in this in this world
- I mean right you know over to vaccines and everything. So look let's take another break and actually let's focus
- 38:01
- now on some of the stories around the world that are perhaps not as much in
- the American attention span. And of course remember this is all also about what some people quote as the attention
- economy. I mean, nobody has any attention span. So, this is just such a
- a way to, you know, deflect and and uh, you know, not focus on Ukraine, Gaza,
- the the terrible, awful things that are happening in parts of the world like Afghanistan and Africa since USA ideas
- has been has been killed. Let's take a break. We'll be back. Jamie, everybody, we're back with the last part of our
- discussion for this episode and that's on basically what's going on in our wheelhouse, which is Ukraine, Israel,
- Gaza, the rest of the world as America seems to be obsessed by the Epstein
- files and whether Trump is going to survive or not, he is going to survive it. That's my prediction. So Jamie,
- last week the president did something. He made a U-turn which we've discussed and that is said that the Europeans uh
- 39:04
- could buy as as you talked about on one of our early podcasts a way out of this no weapons to Ukraine nonsense from from
- the Trump administration could be that the Europeans buy them and then they give them to Ukraine. So that's all well
- and good, but Moscow now is insisting that it's going to achieve its goals for
- Ukraine before any ceasefire talks. Zalinski, the president of Ukraine, is
- saying that he's ready for ceasefire talks now. And the British are in the middle of chairing a a group of allies
- to try to surge weapons into Ukraine in the next 50 days. And that's because Trump has given Putin 50 days to get
- serious about ceasefire talks uh or else face sanctions and they would be secondary sanctions as well on people
- who are buying things uh from Russia. So, what does that mean, Jamie, as Putin
- gets ready to really have this summer offensive with more than a 100,000
- 40:03
- troops, according to reports, mass to try to get as much territory as he can?
- Well, I think it's two things. Number one, Putin's relentless attacks on Ukraine will continue both in the air,
- on the ground uh for the foreseeable future. But we should remember that uh a lot of Russians die for very little
- ground gained. It is relentless. It is damaging. It is terrible for Ukraine,
- but we shouldn't exaggerate the the gains on the ground. They're very small, very insignificant really compared to
- the number of people dead. Remember, we're talking about Russia having lost a million people dead or wounded in this
- war, soldiers. Those families are You know that he doesn't care and you know he
- know he doesn't care, but the Russian point is the is the Let me finish. You're asking a question.
- Let me finish. I know you're trying to say that Putin gives a damn about his I didn't say that. I never even implied
- it and I wouldn't say that and I've never said that and it wouldn't say that. Putin doesn't give a damn, right?
- 41:01
- We can take that as a given. But a million dead Russians or wounded Russians is a significant number. And in
- Russia, there is a thing called the Russian mother. It's a very real phenomenon. It had an impact in Afghanistan. I believe over time it will
- have an impact in Russia. And I think when we talk about Russia's uh military offensive uh we should point out uh how
- much suffering goes on on the Russian side for them to gain very little territory. Now as far as the weapons
- I I want to say how much suffering goes on on the Ukrainian side because they're we all talk about
- yes but it's well known but just like everything else every other story is pushing it off the airwaves right now.
- It's really bad. Of course, it's terrible. But the Ukrainians are determined to fight. They are not going
- to be intimidated by Russia's relentless offensives. And that's what Europeans and Americans need to appreciate. The
- Ukrainians are doing the fighting and dying. And they're not going anywhere. All they want is the weapons to defend
- 42:00
- themselves. And finally, at last, the Trump administration has figured out a way to provide some of those weapons.
- Not all that the Russ Ukrainians need, but some. and that yes, they're doing it in a way we talked about on this program
- 10 weeks ago, which is have the Europeans buy those American weapons that the Ukrainians need so much. Um,
- and and that is a result of Putin uh dissing Donald Trump over and over again, talking nicely on the phone.
- Apparently, it's Melania Trump who's reminding the president that after they get off the phone, the Russians launch
- another uh attack on Ukraine. Remember, she's from Slovenia. She probably has some real antipathy towards the Russians
- as most East Europeans do and so she's reminding the president that he's being dissed. That has helped turn him around
- but not nearly far enough. The Europeans are stepping up. I think it's significant that they are doing so. The
- British in particular, the British also, there's a report today that much of the
- uh liqufied gas that's going uh around the world is going on British insured
- 43:02
- tankers. So, the British should do a lot less uh bragging and a lot more focusing
- on the British insurance industry. Do you mean, wait a minute, do you mean do you mean Russian gas?
- Russian gas being delivered all over the world on tankers that are insured by British insurance companies and
- registered under British uh insured companies. And that is something the British can do something about. Instead
- of holding all sorts of meetings about pretending to re-enter Europe as a leader, they can focus. Remember the
- British government is one of the reasons the Russians were able to dominate Europe. Remember we lived in London and
- Russian oligarchs had financed the the industries of tax and lawyers and real
- estate and they had brought great great income into London and the British government turned a blind eye. They're
- suddenly realizing you may seen last week they they're identifying the spies.
- They're putting them in jail. They're they're realizing the extent to which Russia has infiltrated the country.
- 44:01
- Well, here's a concrete example for the UK to step up and stop these uh oil
- tankers and other liqufied national gas delivery uh ships from being insured by
- British insurance companies, which keeps the Russian war economy fueled by money.
- And that would be just as important as organizing the meeting for sending weaponry uh to Ukraine. That weaponry is
- important. and Ukraine will get it. But I think the sanctions that Donald Trump talked about that you just mentioned, we
- need it's it's a cumulative sanctions is a weird thing. It doesn't work until it works. It's frustrating because it
- doesn't seem to have an immediate impact. But one day in some way, somehow the system suddenly can't handle it
- anymore. And the way we do that is by making sanctions enforced. Trump has mentioned one way. I'm giving you
- another way. we talked about on this program sending weapons uh US weapons to
- Europe. Let's get the British to lead a real sanctions enforcement effort and I bet that will have an impact on the
- 45:02
- Russian economy. Of course, the British got very very serious after the full-scale invasion
- and even before you remember the Novich poisonings and I mean they got really serious. Uh
- it's taken a while though to turn around the British economies. But I have to I have to point that out.
- Um cuz Russia actually attacked people on British soil. Now also it is time Jamie for the American
- administration to demand and use all their powers to get a ceasefire.
- Whatever threats, whatever leverage, whatever they can do in Gaza every
- single day now. And it looks crazy. It looks like it's just gone to a to a
- level that we can't even understand. from bombing uh you know a Catholic church you know which then Netanyahu had
- to apologize for last week to now there's reports of of people having been
- killed just trying to get food to at near a border of Gaza to Israel they're just desperate and apparently the the
- 46:04
- reason was there was just too much crowds well yeah desperate people are going to want you know they're gonna
- they're going to want food and it's going to get very very difficult there reports from Gaza from the Gaza
- officials the health officials that at least 20 people have now died of what they say is starvation. And we have a
- new Israeli air and ground offensive into a place called Deerbala, which is
- in central uh Gaza after having been dropped leaflets and told to evacuate. I mean, seriously,
- what is going on? Last week, we talked with, you know, your former boss, uh, Anthony Blinken, who said they, the
- Israelis, have achieved their military aims a year ago, and now they're telling
- starving people that they have to pick up again and move to other overpopulated
- zones. Why? To get a Hamas commander? I don't know. But this is now going completely crazy, it seems. No, where
- 47:02
- are the hostages? And no end in sight for the hostages either. There's an odd silver lining here. Um, I
- saw in one of the more uh odd things, White House officials actually
- expressing frustration about the Israeli government in the sense of their bombing
- in Syria. And I think this could be a way for uh the Trump White House to
- begin to finally realize their problem with Netanyahu is that all he knows how to do is support military objectives in
- Gaza, support military objectives in Lebanon, support military objectives in Iran, and now interfering completely out
- of order with the internal affairs in Syria. Syria is interestingly something
- that Trump is proud of. Remember, he did something that I give him credit for is he met with the new leader of Syria. He
- ignored the leader past history with uh extremist uh terrorist groups and said,
- 'Okay, I'm going to give you a chance.' And he did something that I doubt a Democrat would have done so quickly, which is lift all the or suspend all the
- 48:05
- sanctions on Syria. So, he's now invested in progress in Syria. Trump actually gets credit because as I think
- you know during his first term he saved the last piece of Syria in Idlib when he
- threatened Putin and Assad not to go in there and they didn't and that's from
- the place from which al-Shar came and the and the uh Syrian revolution
- succeeded in overthrowing Assad. So Trump has an investment in a way in in
- Syria moving in the right direction. Israel is making that extremely difficult. What business it is of theirs
- between the D the Drews and the and the uh Syrian government figuring out how to live together and protect each other and
- avoid a civil war? Why are the Israelis interfering in that? They say they're protecting their Drews.
- They're they're loyal Drews. They're just doing what their Drews are asking them to do. That's arrogance. Israel doesn't rule in the Middle East.
- 49:00
- Israel shouldn't rule in the Middle East. They are not the arbiters of what should happen. Yeah, but they've taken that position,
- Jamie. They bombed all over the Middle East and everybody's been praising them as far as I can see. And now they may have done what often
- happens is you take your arrogance one step too far and then you get a comeuppance. And I am hoping because I
- like to find silver linings. Sometimes they turn out to be true. uh that this may be their comeuppance where Trump
- actually gets infuriated with Netanyahu because all they know how to do is to use military force and they're very bad
- at turning that military force into a success through diplomacy. They can't do
- it in Iran. They can't do it in Gaza. They can't do it. The only place they did it was in Lebanon because we
- insisted on it and Biden succeeded in ending the war in Lebanon through intense diplomacy uh that the Israelis
- eventually acquiesed in. Now it has to happen in Gaza. It should be happening in Syria and it should be happening in
- Iran. And maybe, just maybe, this bombing in Syria was a step too far for the Israelis. I'm hoping for in terms of
- 50:04
- Trump. Let's hope that the Trumpies can get angry at that and have some humanitarian
- uh, you know, care and motivation for what's happening in Gaza 20 plus months on. It is now it well it has been for a
- long long time unconscionable and self-defeating and it's it's really it's
- really it's it's and they won't let us in to report it. It's just it's just a
- nightmare for those people. Anyway, that's it for this episode. Thank you
- all for listening. Uh, make sure you're following the feed so that you never miss an episode and we will see you as
- usual on Thursday for our bonus Q&A part of it. Keep them coming as we do like to
- hear from you and we do like to answer you. So email us at ammanporpodglobal.com. Find us on social media at amanpur pod
- and you can listen to Christian presents the XFiles on global player. Download it
- 51:02
- from the app or download it from the app store or go to globalplayer.com. I'm still confused. All right. Well, we're
- doing fine here. We're week 11. We're doing just fine. Yeah. See you next time.
Peter Burgess COMMENTARY
Peter Burgess
| |