TrueValueMetrics ... Impact Accounting for the 21st Century

Date: 2025-07-04 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00028445

HYPOTHETICAL BOEING Auto Central: Boeing Just Pulled the Plug, Entire US Aviation Industry Pending Collapse—Massive Layoffs PLAY YOUTUBE VIDEO Original article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWGbQA_ECLw Peter Burgess COMMENTARY YouTube is delivering a lot of presentations to me along the lines of this one. I am annoyed that it is so difficult to sort out the 'facts' from the 'fictions' ... a strategy that is probably good for YouTube, but is a disaster for users in general and especially people like me. There is some 'art' in the design of videos like this ... getting the balance between believability and pure fantasy is a skill ... BUT ... I really don't have the time for an additional diet of fantasy over and above the malitious misinformation that already exists! Peter Burgess
Boeing Just Pulled the Plug, Entire US Aviation Industry Pending Collapse—Massive Layoffs Auto Central 2.51K subscribers May 1, 2025 Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg has just made a stunning revelation that has sent shockwaves across the American aerospace industry. In a historic and contentious step, Boeing is officially closing all of its factories in the United States and shifting its production operations abroad. This big decision comes only days after newly elected US President Donald Trump announced severe new tariffs on key trading partners such as China, the European Union, and Mexico. The departure of the aviation powerhouse from the United States is a watershed moment for both the American industrial sector and global aerospace dominance. Concerns over the future of thousands of high-paying American jobs are mounting as Boeing moves its operations abroad, particularly in areas like Washington and South Carolina, where Boeing's plants have long been a pillar of local economies. Boeing's CEO, Kelly Ortberg, claimed that the increased tariffs will cripple its supply networks, raise manufacturing costs, and harm global competitiveness. In response, Boeing will move its attention to countries with more favorable trade policies and lower labor costs. This move has already sparked political pushback, labor union indignation, and intense debate about President Donald Trump's economic policies. As Boeing leaves the United States, the global aerospace industry is on high alert. This might allow competitors like Airbus, Lockheed Martin, and even developing players from China and Russia to get a larger piece of the global aviation market. The question now is if other US-based businesses would follow Boeing's lead and depart American soil in response to Trump's contentious tariffs. Stay tuned as we examine this breaking story and the ongoing effects of President Donald Trump's economic policies on Boeing, American jobs, US factories, and global trade dynamics. Transcript 0:00 china has responded in Donald Trump's trade war halting orders of Boeing aircraft china's government has reportedly ordered its domestic airlines to stop accepting deliveries of Boeing jets and the announcement that Boeing one of America's most iconic aerospace companies would be closing all of its factories in the United States and relocating operations abroad came as a seismic shock to the nation kelly Ortberg the newly appointed CEO of Boeing made the revelation shortly after Donald Trump having recently taken office as president of the United States introduced sweeping tariffs targeting international trade partners in the volatile aftermath of the political decision Boeing's move was seen as a thunderous reaction one that not only signaled deep corporate discontent but also carried sweeping consequences for the American economy its workforce and the future of global industrial leadership before we start smash the like and subscribe buttons for more updates boeing's decision to vacate its American manufacturing footprint was 1:04 unprecedented in scale and symbolism for decades the company had served not just as a pillar of the US economy but as a symbol of American ingenuity and industrial might plants in Washington South Carolina Missouri and California had turned out some of the most sophisticated aerospace technology in the world thousands of workers engineers technicians and support staff had devoted their careers to building the aircraft that helped the United States dominate commercial aviation and military aerospace sectors alike the closing of these facilities represented not just the end of an era but the beginning of a complex and unsettling transition for an industry deeply intertwined with national identity at the heart of Boeing's decision lay the newly imposed tariffs by the Trump administration seeking to bolster domestic industries and rebalance international trade the administration introduced sweeping import duties on a wide range of goods including critical materials such as steel aluminum and 2:04 various aerospace components though intended to support American manufacturers the tariffs inadvertently placed heavy burdens on companies like Boeing that operated in intricate globalized supply chains the costs of raw materials skyrocketed access to crucial components tightened and foreign partners grew wary of sustained collaboration with US-based firms for Boeing whose production models depended on seamless international cooperation and competitively priced materials the new trade policies made manufacturing in the United States increasingly untenable kelly Ortberg's strategic pivot reflected a grim calculus boeing's survival in the fiercely competitive global aerospace market required flexibility efficiency and affordability traits that were becoming impossible to maintain under the new tariff regime by moving operations abroad Boeing aimed to 3:01 sidestep the rising costs and complications introduced by the US tariffs positioning itself in more tradefriendly environments where supply chains could operate with minimal friction although the move promised to preserve Boeing's competitiveness in international markets it came at the steep cost of abandoning the thousands of American workers who had built the company's legacy the implications of Boeing's exodus rippled swiftly through every sector of American society economically the closure of Boeing's factories promised to devastate local economies across multiple states communities that had grown around Boeing's sprawling manufacturing complexes faced grim futures as thousands of jobs vanished almost overnight real estate markets in these regions braced for sudden downturns small businesses dependent on Boeing's workforce prepared for drastic declines in revenue and local governments anticipated sharp drops in tax revenue that would imperil public services the knock-on effects threatened to cascade 4:03 beyond immediate layoffs leading to secondary waves of unemployment as suppliers contractors and ancillary businesses also struggled to survive the departure of Boeing also dealt a brutal blow to American industrial confidence for generations the manufacturing prowess of the United States had been a key pillar of its global leadership boeing's withdrawal raised urgent questions about the country's ability to retain its industrial base in an era of increasingly globalized competition if even a Titan like Boeing could no longer find it viable to produce within American borders many wondered what hope remained for smaller manufacturers less capable of weathering the storm of rising material costs and international retaliation strategically the implications were no less profound boeing had long been a critical supplier to the United States military producing aircraft satellites and defense systems essential to national security with 5:01 production moving abroad concerns immediately surfaced regarding supply chain integrity technological security and geopolitical vulnerability even if Boeing retained American headquarters and contractual ties to the US government the outsourcing of manufacturing operations opened the door to potential security risks that could not be easily mitigated ensuring the integrity of sensitive technologies produced outside the country posed a formidable challenge one that demanded new oversight mechanisms and raised fears about the long-term erosion of America's defense industrial base the political landscape also shifted dramatically in the wake of Boeing's announcement donald Trump's administration having positioned itself as the champion of American manufacturing now faced accusations of having inadvertently driven one of its most iconic manufacturers out of the country opponents of the tariff seized upon Boeing's decision as proof that protectionist policies could backfire 6:00 spectacularly harming precisely the industries they were intended to support supporters of the tariffs meanwhile struggled to reconcile the loss of Boeing with their broader vision of American economic renewal some arguing that short-term pain was a necessary price for long-term gain though the human cost was immediate and staggering public sentiment was equally charged workers facing unemployment voiced anger and despair not only at Boeing but at a government whose policies they felt had failed them protests erupted near factory sites slated for closure with displaced employees and their families demanding answers and assistance meanwhile broader segments of the American public grappled with the uncomfortable realization that even the largest most storied corporations were no longer bound by patriotic loyalty to American soil in an era driven by shareholder value and global competition corporate allegiance to countries seemed an increasingly quaint notion 7:01 internationally Boeing's move was closely watched by competitors and partners alike rival aerospace companies such as Airbus stood poised to capitalize on Boeing's disruption offering themselves as more stable EU backed alternatives to jittery global buyers countries willing to host Boeing's relocated factories competed aggressively for the opportunity offering tax breaks streamlined regulations and promises of labor stability in doing so they accelerated the redistribution of high-skll high-wage jobs away from the United States and toward emerging industrial centers overseas educational institutions and training centers closely linked to Boeing's American operations found themselves in crisis universities and technical schools that had long tailored programs to feed graduates into Boeing's workforce now faced a sudden vacuum investments in STEM education apprenticeships and aerospace engineering programs were thrown into doubt as students and educators alike questioned the value of 8:01 preparing for careers that might no longer exist on US soil the pipeline of American technical talent once a key national asset faced a steep decline without the gravitational pull of major employers like Boeing to sustain it the broader psychological impact of Boeing's decision was perhaps the most difficult to measure but also the most profound for generations American exceptionalism had been underpinned by a belief in the nation's unparalleled ability to design build and innovate boeing's retreat represented a rupture in that narrative forcing Americans to confront uncomfortable truths about the challenges of competing in a hyper globalized world no longer could the US simply assume that its industrial dominance was inevitable instead sustaining leadership in aerospace and other critical industries would require painful introspection strategic recalibration and perhaps a fundamental rethinking of the relationship between government policy corporate strategy and national interest the speed and totality 9:03 of Boeing's move left little room for transitional measures unlike past cases where companies gradually shifted production offshore Boeing's decision to shutter all American factories at once created a sharp traumatic break this suddenness compounded the economic and social disruptions leaving workers communities and policymakers scrambling to adapt in real time emergency task forces were hastily assembled to devise responses but the sheer scale of the dislocation made it clear that no quick fixes were available recovery would require years if not decades of concerted effort in the wake of the closures state and local governments confronted painful decisions without Boeing's tax contributions funding gaps loomed over essential services such as education healthcare and infrastructure some municipalities considered drastic measures including slashing public services raising taxes or courting new 10:01 industries any industries to fill the void the destabilization of these communities served as a stark reminder of the risks associated with over reliance on a single corporate anchor and raised calls for more diversified resilient economic development strategies going forward culturally the loss of Boeing's American factories prompted a national conversation about the future of work and the meaning of economic security in the 21st century the traditional promise that hard work in manufacturing could provide a stable middle class life was further eroded younger generations already skeptical of industrial career paths now saw aerospace manufacturing as a sector in retreat its stability and prestige severely tarnished the American dream once inextricably tied to industrial employment appeared increasingly out of reach for vast swaths of the population environmental considerations also came into play with Boeing shifting production abroad concerns arose about 11:03 the environmental standards under which its new facilities would operate many of the countries eager to host Boeing's factories had laxer environmental regulations than the United States raising fears that the relocation could contribute to greater global carbon emissions and industrial pollution environmental advocacy groups already wary of Boeing's ecological footprint amplified their criticisms and demanded greater transparency and accountability from the company as it charted its new international course meanwhile the financial markets reacted with a mix of short-term enthusiasm and long-term uncertainty boeing's stock price initially surged on news that the company was moving to protect its bottom line by escaping the constraints of the US tariff environment investors welcomed the prospect of lower production costs and access to emerging markets however deeper concerns soon surfaced regarding the potential reputational damage to Boeing's brand the risks of operating in politically 12:05 volatile regions and the possibility of intensified regulatory scrutiny both at home and abroad in the long run Boeing's decision was a gamble one that could either preserve its status as a global powerhouse or entangle it in unforeseen complications the sudden shift also altered the landscape of international trade negotiations boeing's exit emboldened some of America's trade partners who saw the company's departure as validation of their criticisms of US tariff policies at the same time it weakened the American position in ongoing trade talks as negotiators could no longer credibly claim that US industry was thriving under the new regime boeing's move thus reverberated beyond corporate boardrooms influencing the geopolitical chessboard at a moment when global economic alignments were already in flux amidst all these ripples the human cost of Boeing's decision 13:02 remained perhaps the most heartbreaking element the engineers assembly line workers administrative staff and countless others who had dedicated years and in some cases decades of their lives to Boeing were left to navigate an uncertain future some would retrain for new careers others would leave their communities in search of opportunities elsewhere and many would simply fall through the cracks of an inadequate social safety net their stories marked by resilience bitterness and broken dreams became part of a larger national reckoning with the costs of globalization and the fragility of economic security boeing's departure from US shores thus stood not merely as a corporate relocation but as a historic turning point a moment when the forces of global trade political policy and technological change collided with devastating consequences the effects would not be confined to the aerospace sector alone rather they would serve as a cautionary tale across industries and societies grappling with the challenges 14:04 of an interconnected rapidly evolving world the road ahead promised to be long and fraught with difficulty and while Boeing would continue to soar above the clouds in one form or another the ground it left behind told a much more sobering story would you like me to also create a second version in a slightly different tone for example a bit more dramatic or more analytical as the reverberations of Boeing's dramatic decision spread new dimensions of its impact began to surface painting a deeper and more intricate picture of the profound consequences for America and the global stage the sheer magnitude of an industrial titan like Boeing leaving its home nation triggered a complex set of reactions not only among those immediately affected but across sectors and societies that had long depended on the company's towering presence as a pillar of reliability innovation and national pride among the first sectors to experience shock waves was the specialized field of aerospace research and development boeing had historically 15:04 collaborated with a constellation of universities private research institutions and government agencies to push the boundaries of aviation and space exploration grants scholarships internships and co-ressearch ventures which had cultivated generations of aerospace engineers and scientists suddenly faced abrupt suspension or termination laboratories that had been halfway through pioneering projects found themselves scrambling for alternative funding while researchers feared that critical innovations such as next generation propulsion systems advanced materials and autonomous flight technologies would be delayed or lost altogether without Boeing's heavy investment in research domestically the United States faced the potential loss of its edge in cuttingedge aerospace technologies a void formed and while other companies might attempt to step into the breach none possessed the same scale ambition or integrative capacity 16:00 that Boeing had developed over more than a century consequently America's leadership in fields such as hypersonic travel sustainable aviation fuels and satellite systems faced fresh threats from international competitors who were eager to capitalize on this moment of American vulnerability diplomatically Boeing's relocation strained relationships between the United States and its allies for decades Boeing aircraft had been symbols of American soft power vehicles not just of transportation but of global influence governments worldwide particularly those with strong defense ties to the US had purchased Boeing's jets and military systems investing not just in products but in a strategic partnership boeing's decision to manufacture abroad introduced complications to these long-standing defense procurement contracts allies questioned whether future deliveries would meet the same stringent security standards and worried about potential political entanglements with the countries where new production 17:03 facilities would be based this uncertainty opened the door for diplomatic realignments with some US allies beginning to consider shifting defense procurements away from Boeing to domestic or European suppliers airbus already a fierce rival gained ground as nations sought reliable partners who could offer stability without the looming complications introduced by Boeing's new global posture the commercial aviation market which for decades had been a two-horse race between Boeing and Airbus now lean noticeably in favor of the European conglomerate reshaping the global balance of industrial power financial markets although initially buoied by Boeing's cost-saving measures began to manifest deeper anxieties about the sustainability of the move investors realized that the regulatory environments Boeing would now operate in varied widely in their transparency legal protections and political stability countries that offered attractive incentives for relocation 18:02 also carried hidden risks unstable governments volatile labor markets and exposure to regional conflicts boeing's heavy reliance on these new jurisdictions introduced levels of operational risk previously unknown to a company whose US-based factories had been havens of predictability insurance costs for Boeing surged as a result reflecting heightened concerns about supply chain disruptions political expropriation and legal disputes abroad moreover Boeing's brand long associated with rigorous safety and regulatory standards risked delilution as the public and clients questioned whether planes built under differing regulatory regimes would maintain the gold standard Boeing had once guaranteed airlines both domestic and international began re-evaluating their procurement strategies wary of passenger perceptions and potential maintenance inconsistencies meanwhile a less visible but equally potent impact unfurled across the American educational system k12 school 19:03 districts in regions historically supported by Boeing's taxes and philanthropic contributions saw immediate funding shortfalls programs focused on STEM science technology engineering and mathematics education particularly those designed to funnel promising young minds into aerospace careers were cut back or dissolved entirely outreach programs that had once inspired children with dreams of becoming astronauts aerospace engineers or pilots vanished leaving an educational and aspirational vacuum the cultural disconnect between younger Americans and the aerospace industry deepened without tangible local symbols of aerospace achievement the sight of aircraft rolling off assembly lines the presence of engineers giving school talks or the hum of innovation in nearby research parks the industry began to fade from public consciousness space exploration aviation and advanced manufacturing felt less like attainable futures and more like distant relics of a bygone era in a nation built on dreams 20:01 of flight and frontier exploration the loss of such symbols represented a profound blow to collective identity on a political level Boeing's departure added intense fuel to ongoing debates about globalization corporate responsibility and national loyalty across the ideological spectrum voices rose in anger and frustration populists on the right decrieded the betrayal of American workers calling for punitive measures against companies that offshored critical industries progressives on the left pointed to Boeing's move as evidence of unchecked corporate greed arguing for new frameworks of corporate governance that prioritized worker rights community investment and national interests over shareholder profits proposals emerged for sweeping legislative reforms punitive taxation on companies that relocated operations abroad incentives for industries that committed to domestic manufacturing and enhanced labor protections to cushion the blow for displaced workers the notion of 21:03 economic patriotism gained traction though consensus on what it should entail remained elusive in this climate Boeing became a symbol of everything that seemed broken in the American capitalist model a profitable powerful entity capable of abandoning its roots when the financial calculus shifted even slightly against its favor as tensions mounted labor unions found themselves at a crossroads historically strong in aerospace manufacturing unions had long counted Boeing among their major battlegrounds for wages benefits and worker protections now with factories shutting down on mass unions faced existential questions about their future role some attempted to pivot focusing on organizing the few remaining domestic aerospace employers others shifted toward political advocacy channeling worker anger into campaigns for legislative reforms that could protect future generations from similar corporate upheaval at the same time the technological infrastructure supporting Boeing's operations in America began to 22:06 atrophy specialized toolm makers software developers logistics firms and precision parts manufacturers that had tailored their operations to Boeing's stringent specifications found themselves a drift the intricate web of subcontractors and partners that had formed an ecosystem around Boeing's plants disintegrated with few finding easy alternatives to replace their lost contracts entire clusters of high-v value industrial expertise once concentrated in places like Everett Washington risk dispersal or dissolution international supply chains became more complicated as Boeing attempted to rebuild its logistical architecture from the ground up in foreign territories while initial financial projections for the move emphasized cost savings hidden expenses quickly accumulated new facilities had to be constructed from scratch new workforces trained and new 23:00 regulatory hurdles navigated the time required to bring these operations up to Boeing's historic standards proved far greater than anticipated leading to production delays and reputational setbacks in the highstakes world of aerospace where contracts are won and lost on reliability and timeliness these hiccups carried serious consequences technological integration also suffered much of Boeing's success had stemmed from close collaboration between design engineers production teams and testing units all located within reasonable proximity this synergy was not easily replicable across continents and time zones miscommunications project delays and quality control issues began to emerge undermining the company's once vaunted reputation for precision and excellence clients who had come to expect seamless flawless deliveries found themselves grappling with the new reality of a more fragmented less predictable Boeing civic leaders from cities impacted by Boeing's departure began forming regional coalitions to 24:06 demand federal intervention they sought funding for economic diversification programs retraining initiatives and infrastructural improvements designed to attract new industries some regions look to emerging fields such as renewable energy biotech or information technology as potential replacements for aerospace manufacturing but the transition promised to be neither swift nor painless the decades of specialized expertise built around Boeing would not easily translate into new sectors and the generational trauma inflicted by the closures would leave deep scars global competitors sensing opportunity moved aggressively to fill the void Boeing had left behind in Asia particularly in China stateup supported aerospace firms ramped up investment and production aiming to establish themselves as credible alternatives to Boeing and Airbus alike new aircraft models were announced showcasing capabilities that until recently would have seemed out of reach governments that had once looked 25:06 to Boeing as a trusted supplier began diversifying their sources eager to avoid over reliance on a company now mired in operational uncertainty in the media narratives about American decline gained traction pundits and commentators pointed to Boeing's relocation as a vivid symbol of the challenges facing the United States in maintaining its leadership role on the global stage commentaries blended economic analysis with cultural lamentation asking whether America's best days of innovation and industrial might were now firmly in the past the symbolism of a once proud builder of airplanes machines that embodied dreams of progress and connection now dismantling its factories and seeking cheaper horizons elsewhere proved too potent to ignore boeing itself despite public relations efforts to frame the move as a necessary adaptation to global realities struggled 26:01 to control the narrative lawsuits emerged from former employees and municipalities alleging breach of contract failure to meet community obligations and even false promises regarding long-term employment security congressional hearings were convened to grill Boeing executives about the decision and Kelly Ortberg found himself navigating a hostile political environment that questioned both his leadership and the company's future commitment to American interests within Boeing's internal culture morale plummeted the transition created divisions between those employees retained to oversee international expansion and those discarded in the US closures the sense of shared purpose that had once defined Boeing's workforce eroded rapidly replaced by cynicism and disillusionment even among international hires questions persisted about Boeing's loyalty and long-term investment in their new host countries given the company's willingness to abandon its American roots so abruptly the long shadow cast by Boeing's exit continued to stretch wider across every facet of 27:02 the American landscape revealing consequences that were both immediate and deeply structural as time passed new layers of disruption emerged making it increasingly clear that the decision to move operations abroad was not a singular event but a catalyst for profound cascading changes throughout industries governance structures and even cultural identities one of the most significant areas to experience fallout was the intricate network of federal contracts that Boeing had long enjoyed particularly in defense and space exploration for decades the company had been not just a contractor but a close partner of agencies like NASA and the Department of Defense boeing's planes satellites missiles and space vehicles were integral to national security operations and ambitions for space dominance with the heart of its production now shifted offshore serious questions arose about the feasibility and prudence of awarding sensitive projects to a company manufacturing in foreign jurisdictions national security 28:06 experts voiced sharp concerns about potential vulnerabilities supply chain security long a priority in defense contracting became a crisis point the possibility of foreign interference intellectual property theft or sabotage in Boeing's overseas facilities could no longer be dismissed as hypothetical defense officials were forced to consider diversifying procurement strategies bringing in newer or smaller companies that still operated domestically despite their lack of Boeing scale or experience this fragmentation introduced new risks of its own as piecing together multiple contractors for projects traditionally handled by a single integrated entity threatened to increase costs and reduce operational efficiency in parallel American competitiveness in the realm of space exploration took a serious hit boeing had been a principal player in the nation's space endeavors from the space shuttle era to contemporary projects like the space launch system 29:05 SLS and deep space probes NASA found itself in an uncomfortable position relying on a partner whose production now lay outside national borders public private space initiatives already complex and fraught with cost overruns became even more complicated as political pressure mounted to shift contracts toward fully domestic suppliers these dynamics slowed timelines for critical missions including the planned return to the moon and future Mars expeditions eroding America's hard one leadership position in the new space race industries adjacent to aerospace such as avionics composits manufacturing and high performance computing also faced contraction boeing's departure removed a major driver of demand for specialized innovations and complex engineering solutions startups and established firms alike who had depended on Boeing contracts to fund research and expand capabilities faced dire prospects the 30:03 chilling effect on venture capital investments in these high-tech sectors was immediate investors wary of backing companies whose primary customer base was disappearing redirected capital towards safer less innovationdriven fields like software and consumer technology this redirection of investment not only hurt job creation in high value industries but also impacted America's broader innovation ecosystem the traditional cycle of government research funding private sector commercialization and global technological leadership was disrupted without Boeing as a reliable anchor for early stage aerospace technologies many potentially transformative ideas stalled at the prototype phase or migrated to more receptive ecosystems abroad further eroding America's competitive edge in emergent technologies if you like this video please give it a like and subscribe to our channel also leave your comments below and tell us what are your thoughts on Boeing closing US factories and moving abroad after tariffs we want to hear from you thank you for watching and see you next time

SITE COUNT