How do we overcome the moral squalor of Trump? | The Coffee Klatch with Robert Reich
Robert Reich
659K subscribers ... 102,096 views ... 6.8K likes
Premiered May 18, 2024
The Coffee Klatch with Robert Reich
- Justice Alito flying a pro-insurrection flag…
- Trump's lackeys attacking his trial...
- Billionaires behaving badly...
- Heather Lofthouse of @imcivicaction and I break down all this week's news in the Coffee Klatch. Pour yourself a cup and join us.
Transcript
- 0:00
- and it is the Saturday coffee clutch
- with Heather loft house and yours truly
- Robert R Heather good morning good
- morning to you what do we have on Deck
- today today we have Justice alto's
- upside down flag I just we have the GOP
- going to the trial we have Republican
- donors winning at
- capitalism um and billionaires Behaving
- Badly uh sounds like the same story over
- and over different versions of it and
- what let's talk about the flag the down
- flag what is this Alo Justice Alo put up
- an upside down flag outside his home
- when though January 17
- 2021 now this this is right after
- obviously the riot um the Trump induced
- RI uh but why is the story coming out
- now that's my I have the same question I
- mean it seems like based on the New York
- Times article I read and you read and so
- many people read the court seems to have
- known about this the neighbors clearly
- 1:00
- knew about it I don't know why has it
- been squelched for three years well also
- obviously why did he do it I mean an
- upside down flag means in this day and
- age means you're a Trumper right
- definitely and at that exact time it
- meant stop the steal we don't believe in
- the peaceful transfer of power now we've
- talked about a lot about uh justice well
- I mean we we know the justices are not
- completely neutral uh but uh what's
- what's the I mean Alo is is is a
- republican a republican point point uh
- but how can he possibly justify putting
- up a flag which is the whole point of
- putting up a flag is to Signal something
- I mean you don't put up a flag you know
- in your living room you put it up
- outside to tell your neighbors and
- friends and everybody else going bu the
- car something and that is Trump is right
- what is going on here he claim I had
- 2:00
- nothing to do with the flag my wife put
- it up and it was in response to a
- neighbor this sounds strangely like
- another Justice we know about uh who
- says it wasn't me it was my wife but is
- that some kind of spousal privilege what
- is that no no no but it does also it
- does there's a distinction between what
- uh you know Jenny Thomas arguably
- Clarence can say well you know she's her
- independent person she can do what she
- wants but when you put a flag in front
- of your house it sort of implicates the
- household also there's a flag code there
- is there is a flag code oh there's a in
- the in the laws in United States code
- right so even so finally there's been a
- code that's been somewhat adopted for
- the Supreme Court right but back in 202
- I think there was 2021 there was no
- ethics code but you'd think we'd follow
- the flag code at least that says you
- only put up a flag in the correct
- direction if you ever do an upside down
- flag it's distress or something else but
- you're a Justice of the Supreme Court
- you one of your most important responsib
- ility is just make sure people know that
- 3:01
- you are neutral that you are nonpartisan
- that you don't have opinions and Views
- this is right before they were taking
- votes on all sorts of yep matters that
- are related to what happened on January
- 6th doesn't feel very impartial you know
- I was a supreme I was a clerk not for
- the Supreme Court for the court of
- appeals First Circuit uh the Chief
- Justice of the first circuit and um when
- uh archal Cox uh was was sacked by uh
- the Republicans by by Robert Bourke and
- the Republicans because he was basically
- a special prosecutor uh I put up a uh on
- my bumper I had a bumper sticker and I
- put on on my bumper sticker remember I'm
- a clerk of the First Circuit Court I
- just put up a bumper sticker you know
- impeach the Cox sacker I thought it was
- pretty neutral did you get in trouble
- for it yes I mean the whole Court said
- you have you can't do that you've got to
- 4:00
- cover that up that's that's that's
- that's a clerk it's not only disgusting
- but it's partisan it's partisan but you
- are part of the court system you cannot
- take a partisan side in a public display
- way how did it feel to hear that did you
- feel I felt well I felt a little bit you
- know what about my free speech and then
- I was little embarrassed right quite
- honestly do you think Alo is embarrassed
- about the situ he has any shame at all I
- mean uh how many months later how many
- what was was a year and a half later
- that the do's decision he authored the
- do's decision um I think uh I think he's
- got to explain this doesn't he doesn't
- this violate the new code of ethics of
- the Court one would think but it's so
- scary it feels like they just have power
- for days well it feels like they don't
- care well that too and they they don't
- feel that they are in any way obligated
- to justify whatever they do right right
- it's very scary but it is interesting
- that it's only just now coming out yeah
- 5:01
- I don't understand that what else is
- going to be coming out I mean with
- Clarence Thomas is there going to be
- more with Clarence Thomas and His and
- the money that he's making and I just
- you know John Roberts one of the duties
- of a chief justice is to maintain the
- Integrity of the court and the the way
- the people view it and ride rough shot
- over any justice who's doing anything
- that in any way denigrates the court uh
- John Roberts did not done anything I
- mean this this little ethics thing is is
- a joke right as a result the public The
- public's view of the Court the last time
- I looked was was lower than it's been at
- any time uh since the mid 20th century
- since the early part of the 20th century
- which is not surprising upside down
- Flags it's it's not surprising but I I I
- have to admit that this one does
- surprise me yeah it's pretty egregious
- oh well we'll see more will be revealed
- because it only just came out yesterday
- or than I before whenever it was
- 6:00
- outrageous it's outrageous outrageous
- Sam Alo will you explain what you just
- did or what you did two years ago or
- what you say your your your your wife
- did and why you're not implicated I hope
- he listens to you okay so then we should
- talk about the Trump trial Michael Cohen
- all week well you know the trial drows
- on and on and on an interesting thank
- goodness it's not televised that's what
- I think too I mean it's so it's nice to
- be able to in this day and age I mean
- you have the little Court sketches and
- you get to read the articles about it
- but you don't have to watch it you can
- kind of use your imagination and we
- don't have to watch and Trump doesn't
- have the privilege of being on camera
- but you know Heather the other thing I
- was I was thinking about this particular
- trial this election interference hush
- money trial uh and everybody involved
- you know from David Becker the head of
- the the publisher of the of the national
- Inquirer through Stormy Daniels there's
- something kind of toddy about it it's
- 7:02
- kind of the moral squalor of the Trump
- crowd I mean they're not part of the
- Trump they all part of the Trump crowd
- they're all influenced by the same
- things that Trump is influenced
- everybody is out to make money
- everybody's out to screw everybody else
- everybody is out to you know even
- stormmy Daniels what does she do as soon
- as Trump is running for president she
- says she she's shopping the story around
- what is David pecker doing he is trying
- to repress stories and get chits that he
- can use with Donald Trump later on and
- what what is uh with the fixer doing
- he's trying to fix things by you know
- paying people off and what is Donald
- Trump doing he's saying pay them off I
- mean every it's kind of a human people
- don't treat each other this way in real
- life do they I mean this is real life
- right but no but most people don't I
- mean there's a we we're we're Guided by
- norms and rules I don't mean to sound
- naive I mean I've been in I've been
- 8:00
- around powerful people I've seen some
- pretty bad things but this is this is
- sort of we're taking for granted that
- this is the code of conduct and it's not
- a code of conduct there's no standard of
- decency here at all right everything is
- so transactional it's all normalized as
- of course this is how things go you have
- you have a bully for hire you have you
- know everyone's everyone's looking for
- everything's for sale Y and it's all
- transactional there's no relation
- there's no friendship uh there's no
- loyalty there's no honor there's no
- Integrity I know and then of course the
- GOP the Bonkers GOP so we have speaker
- Mike Johnson goes to New York to attend
- the trial a bunch of people from the
- house what is happening and you know
- this is again it has to do with the the
- the Trump's tendency uh I mean he's he's
- actually made entire the entire GOP the
- entire American populace into this let
- them game uh worse than a game I mean
- it's either us or it's them speaker
- Johnson is there because he wants to
- 9:01
- show that he's one of the trumpers and
- uh Allegiance yeah well it's undermining
- the Integrity of the court for one thing
- uh it it kind of it does exactly what
- ELO did in a different way it's just
- basically saying there is no neutrality
- right uh we're all you know we're on one
- side or we're on the other side I know
- um can we talk a little bit about the
- economy the market this week consumer
- protection there was one C there was one
- case um where the cfpb the Consumer
- Financial Protection Bure right this
- this is a this is a good corrective to
- what I just said because Justice Thomas
- wrote the opinion it was a 7 to2 opinion
- seven justices to two outliers uh and
- the Seven justices said uh that the
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau uh
- should be protected uh it's not illegal
- 10:00
- uh the allegation was that the source of
- funding because it didn't come directly
- from Congress violated the Constitution
- and uh Thomas I think in a very
- responsible opinion did I just say that
- about Thomas you did I never quote me
- yeah uh he did have a responsibil
- opinion he said uh look there's nothing
- in the Constitution that says exactly
- where the funds should come from and the
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- should remain Elizabeth Warren was out
- there after the opinion saying great um
- I think it was not only the right
- decision uh but it did uh it did sort of
- make me feel like maybe there is some
- Integrity a little bit left well and
- then we whittel that away days later it
- was Whitt New York Times um but yeah so
- that is a win for consumers but in terms
- of the other news of the week we had
- some losses I would say so Biden the
- Biden Administration has tried to fight
- junk feed it's tried to fight hidden
- 11:01
- fees you know that are with the big
- Banks put in there um in terms of late
- fees and these Airline fees if I can
- just stop you because I want to make
- sure that that we're all together on
- what these fees are these are fees that
- people don't anticipate they're going to
- have to pay I mean uh I just rented a I
- did a rental card just a couple of days
- ago that's a good one and uh there you
- know I had a a price quoted to me yeah
- like we do $29 a day until until $400 a
- day I I actually took my car back after
- renting it for two days and it was a you
- know all these fees that I'd never
- agreed to uh that are but you see it
- with hotels you see it with uh all kinds
- of places Banks and the banks especially
- uh credit card fees they don't tell you
- how much you can have to pay or it's in
- such tiny little print nobody even pays
- attention and so I think that the the
- Administration bu Administration is
- 12:01
- appropriately trying to hit back on
- these fees these junk fees and the banks
- of course
- say don't do that yeah you're
- interfering in capitalism right exactly
- and is there a link between big Banks
- and
- politics well here we get back to you
- know the fundamental problem Heather and
- I go on and on about this and you're
- very good to to to hear hear me out but
- as long as you've got big money
- dominating politics and big money is
- more and more I mean it's by from the
- big corporations and the big Banks and
- the richest people in America that money
- is influencing inevitably the outcomes
- of our politics I mean if that's not
- corruption and bribery and and people
- know that and and it's it it really
- started in a very big way with the
- financial crisis of 2008 uh where the
- banks got bailed out uh and millions of
- homeowners uh lost their homes and they
- 13:02
- lost their jobs and they lost their
- savings and people said this is a this
- system stinks you know it's really it's
- rigged yeah and we're still living with
- that and as more and more money comes
- into the system from the big Banks and
- and the richest people well I I I can
- understand why some people will throw up
- their hands and say I'm going to vote
- for Trump because because uh yes he's
- anti- democracy but so is the system
- right now at least he's on my side I
- know it I know it and speaking so he got
- a day off of court yesterday of course
- to attend his son's graduation oh but
- also throw a gigantic
- fundraiser so his Excuse excuse from
- court was was he wanted to attend his
- son's graduation but who did not go to
- Trump University by the way oh that's
- really I'm I'm sorry did he not get in
- probably that's funny anyway anyway now
- the one other thing on the that I read
- this week too is um it's cheaper in some
- 14:03
- instances to fly to Europe to see Taylor
- Swift than it is to see her in America
- okay well this is this is another this
- goes right with the junk fees because
- you've got these uh these these scalper
- systems this secondary market right yes
- and it is driving costs through the roof
- uh and uh and they're getting together
- Live Nation uh and Ticket Master uh so
- it's it's it's the scalping industry is
- consolidating making it even less
- competitive uh and so and people are
- paying through their nose in the United
- States oh yeah in apparently for her
- concert in Miami tickets on StubHub were
- going between $2,000 and
- $8,000 I me you can fly to Paris and it
- doesn't but it doesn't go to Taylor
- Swift Bingo it goes to the scalping
- industry to Live Nation and to Ticket
- Master and that's why the B
- Administration is trying to break them
- up why it is so important uh to and this
- is just like the junk fees y I mean in
- 15:02
- other words you can have capitalism that
- works for regular people or capitalism
- that works for the CEOs and the biggest
- shareholders uh and and and the choice
- of capitalism is very important right
- it's not capitalism or socialism the the
- pragmatic choice is between a capitalism
- that is on the side of consumers and
- workers or a capitalism that's on the
- side of uh the people who the richest
- people in the world right and the Biden
- Administration is trying to make good
- for consumers right and that's what they
- do in the and and workers and workers
- and consumers are workers workers are
- consumers and you know the bottom 2third
- 3/4 of Americans by income uh are
- getting shafted and they've been begin
- they've been shafted for years but the
- Biden Administration is the first
- Administration in years that is actually
- trying to change the rules of capitalism
- uh to make sure that working people and
- poor people and lower middle class
- 16:00
- people get a a better deal right now I
- might have gone down a little rabbit
- hole no seriously Googling consumer
- protection so it first appeared in
- Hammer Rob's code I remember I was there
- were you back inia ham Robi actually was
- very nice man he yeah he had a good
- sense of humor and he was kind but a
- lousy politician was he well so but
- really consumer protection has been
- around a long time it's mentioned in the
- Old Testament it was mentioned by Adam
- Smith exactly Wealth of Nations we've
- taken our political economy courses but
- so I mean this is what should be
- happening but of course there people
- keep the airlines are suing the Biden
- Administration the big banks are coming
- Adam well again uh you know during the
- Franklin D Roseville Administration you
- had the same forces the big big Banks
- and the corporations were trying to come
- down uh FDR was trying you know he was
- trying to do social and all kinds of
- 17:00
- things uh that were going to cost money
- and that were going to also regulate uh
- the stock market and they didn't like it
- and in 1936 in the campaign of 36 uh
- Roosevelt said my enemies they hate me
- and I welcome their hatred yes uh well
- they're still at it but they're at it
- with even more money right I mean the
- Supreme Court opened the floodgates with
- citizens united uh and uh I I think it
- to be changed the quote has changed too
- I welcome their
- money that's right they hate me and I'm
- going to welcome their money well if for
- enough for the right price tag well this
- gets back to Alo and Thomas again I mean
- they they are uh you know the worst I
- mean the the the Trump appointees are
- are not much better uh but uh the six of
- them including John Roberts uh are
- really dragging us back to the pre- new
- deal that's what they're trying to do I
- know in so many ways um yeah okay so in
- this this week uh we saw billionaires
- 18:00
- Behaving Badly Joe Hammer Robi that's I
- was trying to remember his first name
- stop imagine if it was for Joe I mean
- Joseph is how I knew Joseph habab Joe
- habab we called him J J yeah love that
- guy um but so you saw that Tesla doesn't
- take out many ads but has decided to
- take out some ads to put in front of its
- shareholders tell us more about that oh
- well you remember the Delaware Court of
- last year Delaware Court said no to to
- uh this gigantic I mean 56 or 57
- billion agreement with Elon Musk uh and
- said that it's not fair to the
- shareholders of Tesla it's just it's
- it's ridiculous it's out it's just it's
- beyond belief uh and the Delaware Court
- which is basically America's Corporate
- Court oh yeah it is I mean most
- companies are in companies are
- Incorporated there because the courts
- are so favorable right uh the Delaware
- Court said no even this is too much for
- 19:01
- us uh and uh You' got to do it again in
- fact you it's no so Elon Musk takes the
- company out of Delaware uh and they do
- and they he gets the board of directors
- who he controls completely his brother's
- on it you know the uh rert Murdoch's son
- is on it uh and uh he says to the U the
- the board of directors of Tesla uh I
- want I want this I really want this this
- is mine I deserve it uh and the head of
- the board of directors sends out a
- message to all the shareholders say
- isn't it unfair what's happened to Elon
- I mean he's been working and he doesn't
- even and the and the and the Delaware
- Court threw out his his 5758 billion and
- we've got to vote again and now they are
- using shareholder money to
- promote Elon musk's bizarre 57 58
- billion I mean there's something wrong
- 20:02
- here there's something very wrong here
- and it's again it's the CEOs who are
- just at the top oh in good news there um
- there was a win for Apple they're going
- to go um on strike the Apple workers had
- a good win I I I think Apple um is ripe
- oh hello not only not only workers but
- also consumers and anti trusters I mean
- apple is uh you know Apple has been
- sending more and more of its profits to
- its CEOs top Executives and shareholders
- through stock buyback we talked about
- that last week 70% billion yeah 70% of
- all the profits I mean more than they're
- spending on research and development so
- and apple is just you know it's getting
- too big it's pushing itself around it's
- it's pushing everybody else around
- consumers workers so it's time yeah it's
- time so our final note of the week there
- is an anniversary 20 years ago marriage
- 21:02
- equality yes got a win in Massachusetts
- but the neat story that I like to think
- about is you in 20 2002 20 tell us what
- you said about marriage equality and
- what you did 2002 hello yeah I ran for
- governor of Massachusetts in 2002 how
- did how' it go I didn't win I didn't I
- didn't even get I mean I I lost the
- primary there were six of us running in
- the primary um I came in second oo if I
- had come in first I would have taken on
- Mitt Romney for governor wow that would
- have been I would have whipped his ass
- would you have but anyway um no I didn't
- because I one of the reasons uh all
- honesty uh was that I came out in favor
- I was the first I was the first
- candidate to come out in favor of
- marriage equality and my my campaign
- manager after I gave this speech my
- campaign manager took me aside he said
- you lost lost it we just lost the
- 22:00
- election should we take a look let's
- take a look at the clip and come right
- back I think it is a matter of civil and
- human rights it goes beyond the idea of
- civil union however and and so a lot of
- people you know find that very upsetting
- 30 years ago a lot of people found the
- idea of uh intermarriage racial
- intermarriage upsetting and there were a
- lot of state laws against it but we've
- come a long way you are absolutely right
- it's not necessarily a popular position
- but my view is what is a campaign all
- about if not at least staking some
- positions that you believe in that may
- not be popular but uh you know that's uh
- you want to you want to educate the
- public about things that you think are
- important well I that was tremendous and
- you basically said look we are going to
- look back on this like are you kidding
- me why were we even talking about this
- well because because the court going
- back to what the theme of of this
- session here our clotch uh the court uh
- particularly
- Thomas uh has threatened uh in the same
- 23:02
- in the same Do's decision that all of
- these all of these rights equal marriage
- rights could be thrown out I mean it's
- it's all up in the air now yeah I know
- and who's who's pushing that it's Alo
- and Thomas well Alo and Thomas but also
- Gorsuch I mean there you can't count on
- anything anymore because they once they
- eroded uh and rever
- uh a woman's right over her body and to
- make a decision over abortion uh the
- same logic could be used to reverse all
- of these other makes me so angry I
- actually have a physical reaction when
- we talk about it well uh I think it
- makes a lot of men angry too this is not
- just a woman's issue um and it shouldn't
- be and uh and rights are on the on the
- table in this election these intimate
- rights these rights of of of marriage
- equality and and what you do with your
- body and and how people live in terms of
- 24:01
- their the most basic freedoms we can
- talk about I mean these conservatives
- for years saying government should not
- intrude on the well what they said what
- they're saying government should not
- intrude on the private sector but what
- about intruding on people on on people's
- intimate private lives uh and that's
- what's really at stake anyway well good
- for you fighting the fight well it was
- years I was young and I didn't know
- better feel like you still fight the
- fight well you do too you do too and
- here's to the fight here's to you
- Heather thank you and thank all of you
- for joining us we will see you next
- Saturday
| |