Management
SDGs

8 ideas on reporting against the SDGs ... summarizing a webinar organized by Ethical Corporation

Burgess COMMENTARY
Sorry I missed the webinar. I am very interested in this subject. I trained as an engineer, an economist and as an accountant and have practiced corporate management as well as consulting for international development and humanitarian crises. The SDGs make for interesting talks, but they are weak relative to what is needed to manage. The SDG Compass is a step in the right direction, but not a big step. I want to see clarity about what is progress (change in balance sheet ... for all the capitals) and what is performance (all the flows into the process relative to all the flows out of the process ... amount of economic value consumed versus amount of value produced) ... and I want numbers, preferable money numbers for economic issues, and an appropriate number set for social issues and another appropriate number set for environmental issues. There are about 200 indicators associated with the 17 goals, but mostly designed from a country / sector perspective but not so much for either the corporate organization, the city (place) or the individual person ... and the core concept in accountancy that differentiates balance sheet accounts from P&L accounts is ignored. We can do better ... and hopefully soon. PeterB http://truevaluemetrics.org

The good news is that there is a robust discussion about the SDGs, but as regards progress in using the SDGs to make the world a better place, the news is not so great. My experience suggests that we have very powerful management systems for improving profit performance of the corporate organization with financial accountancy at the center, but when it comes to country level performance, or city level performance, or individual performance there is no systemic management framework. All we have is a framework for conversation ... and that is not good enough. We need a lot more clarity about the numbering including an appreciation about what is improvement in state (balance sheet / progress) and what is activity performance (P&L) ... ideas from accountancy that are powerful and simplify analysis enormously. PeterB http://truevaluemetrics.org
Peter Burgess

8 ideas on reporting against the SDGs

Last month we hosted a webinar where four panellists lead the discussion on how companies can best report against the Social Development Goals. Here are eight morsels to offer food for thought

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have created a universal framework for the private and public sector along with civil society to work towards a common goal. Increasingly, companies are looking to integrate the SDGs into their business strategy. Our 2018 Responsible Business Trends Report, a survey of over 1,500 global business professionals, found that 69% of businesses are integrating the SDGs into their core strategy – an increase of 9% on last year’s report and 23% on 2016.

As part of the same report, we found that 51% of global brands are using the SDGs as a framework for their reporting strategy. Last month, as part of our knowledge exchange ahead of the Sustainability Reporting and Communications Summit, we hosted a webinar debate to present ideas and strategies on how companies can report against the SDGs. We received more than 1,400 registrants for the webinar and the following panellists lead the discussion:
Piet Klop, senior advisor responsible investment, PGGM
Mario Abreu, vice president environment, Tetra Pak
Michael Dickstein, group sustainability director, Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company
James Gomme, director, sustainable development goals, WBCSD

Below are some of the key ideas and tips shared during the webinar discussion.

1. Map SDGs against both current and future business strategy

All four speakers agreed it’s essential that companies understand which SDGs are material to the core business both now, and in the next 10-15 years. This requires some future gazing and predicting long-term business focus and needs. Piet Klop gave the example of how PGGM created a framework for future investments around three key themes: fiduciary responsibility (Climate); future identity (Health); where they can contribute increased impact (Food and Water). Future investments are then evaluated against these three principles.

Mario Abreu added the point that the SDGs provide a framework and common language for business that’s comparable. It’s imperative that they are viewed from a full business perspective, rather than just a sustainability lens.

2. Do not cherry-pick

It’s easy to full into cherry-picking only positive impacts. However, companies need to understand and address their negative impacts against SDGs. James Gomme stated that, by doing so, companies can understand where the contribution and action could lie for the business.

3. Be inclusive and do the basics first

Michael Dickstein raised an important point about it being critical for companies to ensure they carry out the traditional approach of conducting a materiality matrix first. In this case, doing so will ensure they’ve accounted for all key views and select SDGs that are meaningful and in line with stakeholder expectations.

4. Understand both goals and targets

Gomme highlighted that it’s important businesses understand the granularity of the SDG targets. During the webinar he brought attention to SDG3: Good Health. When focusing on the targets within this goal, there’s Target 3.6: Reducing road traffic accidents. Gomme outlined that representatives within a mining company might not see a clear linkage with this SDG3, however they will when narrowing on Target 3.6.

Gomme also explained that linking the goals and targets from particular regions with a company’s outputs will help enhance its licence to operate and boost its reputation within the region.

5. Measuring impact; the most common struggle

During the webinar we asked participants to indicate where they’re struggling most when reporting against the SDGs. 63% of the audience selected the option of measuring impacts against the SDGs. Dickstein wasn’t surprised by this finding and stated the need for common denominators. Gomme suggested companies look to the SDG Compass for indicators to track impact.

Abreu shared the approach Tetra Pak has taken. The company calculates the status quo of a region – where Tetra Pak hasn’t yet had an impact. It then can calculate and report on the consequences of its work in that region, both positive and negative.

Klop stated it’s imperative that companies report impact metrics that are achievable, relevant and quantifiable.

6. An opportunity to report positives

A lot of human rights reporting is from a risk perspective. Gomme outlined that, although there isn’t an SDG that focusses on human rights, approximately 90% of targets link to existing human rights standards. This presents an opportunity for companies to reframe their human rights work in a positive framework.

7. Avoiding SDGwash

SDGwash is a term, similar to greenwash, where companies are making claims with little change and/or substance. Dickstein stated a lot depends on where a company is on its sustainability journey. If a company has engaged its stakeholders, and developed and implemented a strategy that’s having measurable impacts – then it is appropriate to communicate proactively against SDGs. However, if a company has just started its impact work then it needs to first identify strategy, targets and understand how to measure its impacts.

8. Transparency and authenticity are a must

Klop stated that transparent communication is crucial. Abreu agreed and stated that as well as being transparent it’s essential companies understand that all SDGs are interconnected. Not understanding the interconnectivity runs the risks of ignoring negative impacts. Abreu highlighted that whilst solar panels are innovative (SDG 9) and impact climate (SDG 13), they also create waste that impacts land (SDG 14) and water (SDG 15). By having a full understanding and transparent approach, companies can build authenticity and trust.

Gomme echoed this and stated that companies shouldn’t be afraid to communicate current positive work that’s impacting the SDGs. However, they can’t ignore negative impacts and need to communicate where they need to do more.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The above takeaways are from a recent webinar held as part of the build-up to the 13th Annual Sustainability and Reporting Summit. Senior representatives from Abbott, Syngenta, Pirelli, GRI, Allianz, APG Asset Management, IKEA, Shift, Orange, WBCSD and others will share strategies on how to demonstrate resilience through transparent, SDG-focused disclosure. For more information click here
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Report this 89 Likes Daniella Foster Harshi Joshi Natasha Buckley Jo Sullivan Prerna Singh Sonja Østergaard Raúl Pasco Ames Huram Konjen Nigel Hanscamp Mathilda L.Bosch +79
-------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comments Comments on Liam Dowd’s article Show previous comments Show previous comments on Liam Dowd’s article

1d Open options for Bhushan Patil’s comment Bhushan Patil Bhushan Patil Sustainability enthusiast | Manager Swades Foundation Regarding measuring the impacts and reporting against SDGs I believe our existing sustainability standards and integrated indicators like Social Progress Index can be of great help. We just need to map them against the relevant SDGs they are addressing and quantify it. Like Like Bhushan Patil’s comment Reply
-----------------------------
1d Open options for Fiona Rogers’ comment Fiona Rogers Fiona Rogers Director Global Business Development at Magnum Photos Very interesting article Liam. Do you know if any SDG advocates who are using photography or visual storytelling to help them measure success or impact? I follow the goals with great interest but often come across their reporting as dry references integrated into general CSR or annual reports; would love to see an example of doing this in a compelling way! Thanks Like Like Fiona Rogers’ comment Reply
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Investing Forum- presented by Big Path Capital
27,874 members
Liam Dowd Liam Dowd Managing Director at Ethical Corporation
8 ideas on reporting against the SDGs
As part of the knowledge exchange in the build up to the 12th Annual Sustainability Reporting and Communications Summit we hosted a webinar where four panellists lead the discussion on how companies can best report against the Social Development Goals. Here are eight morsels to offer food for thought

8 ideas on reporting against the SDGs
As part of the knowledge exchange in the build up to the 12th Annual Sustainability Reporting and Communications Summit we hosted a webinar where four
Like Comment 71