image missing
Date: 2024-05-20 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00004725

Metrcis
Measuring Impact

IBM’s success in the “Community Partnerships” scoring dimension and Citi’s success with “Measurement and Strategy.”

Burgess COMMENTARY
I like the fact that there is an effort to measure success ... but the systems of metrics are awfully weak ... in fact, I would hardly call them metrics at all. I have spent some time as a corporate CFO and for me there is a serious rigor about accountancy and financial reporting. The measures that relate to the social impact, are at best, more akin to the way journalists use numbers ... to give the impression that there has been some measurement and analysis.

The use of the phrase 'In 2012, Citi employees contributed more than 1.3 million volunteer hours in efforts they know made a difference.' sounds pretty impressive, but for a company with 260,000 employees it's about 5 hours a year average. Some dads will do 100 hours coaching Little League baseball which pulls the average up, and a huge number will do nothing. The bank's revenues are around $70 billion a year. The volunteer efforts at $50 an hour would be around $65 million.

The important question that does not get answered is what is the valuadd for the communities where the bank works and generates $70 billion of revenues. What impact is the bank having in the core business of the bank and the way it behaves with respect to society's externalities. How much did Citibank and the other big banks impact society by the bubble they built? How much do banks undermine the efforts of good people to address issues like drug money laundering, sanctions, gun running, corruption ... and so on.

These are big issues. The metrics being talked about are pathetically weak.
Peter Burgess

CSRwire Talkback | join the conversation PrintAlerts

The Citi Foundation Finds New Ways to Measure the Impact of CSR Efforts

It’s not easy to capture the effects of philanthropic programs on people’s lives. But it's possible.

Submitted by:Guest Contributors Posted: Feb 26, 2013 – 08:00 AM EST Tags: citi, ncoc, impact measurement, impact investing, philanthropy, volunteerism, pro bono, community development, financial management, neighborworks

The Civic 50, a groundbreaking initiative launched in 2012 by the National Conference on Citizenship, Points of Light and Bloomberg News, identified the top 50 community-minded S&P 500 corporations that best use their time, talent, and resources to improve the quality of life in the communities where they do business. The ranking is based on seven dimensions - community partnerships, measurement and strategy, leadership, design, employee and civic growth, cause alignment, and transparency.

In part two, Ilir Zherka, Executive Director of the National Conference on Citizenship decodes the second dimension: measurement and strategy.

_________________________

It’s not easy to capture the effects of philanthropic programs on people’s lives. But Citi recently earned top honors in measurement and strategy from The Civic 50, a ranking of America’s most community-minded companies, thanks in part to the work of the Citi Foundation, the bank's philanthropic arm.

The Civic 50, a partnership between National Conference on Citizenship and Points of Light, ranks corporations on seven dimensions of local involvement. The measurement and strategy dimension requires a firm to show that it has defined its programs’ goals, performance metrics and interim indicators – or in plain English, that it can trace its community funding to actual changes in individuals’ lives.

How Did The Citi Foundation Do It?

First, they realized they had room to grow. While the Foundation has always been able to count how many people its community-oriented grants and projects reach, getting beyond that was a challenge. “We were really tracking activities, not the impact we were trying to achieve,” recalled Pamela Flaherty, president & CEO of the Citi Foundation and Director of Corporate Citizenship at Citi.

Second, they implemented a results-oriented measurement system, reevaluating their strategy and designing new ways to identify and track the impact of their grantmaking on people’s lives.

People like Ernst Nicolas.

A New York resident, Nicholas came to The Financial Clinic for help in sorting out his debts, repairing his credit rating and getting his spending under control. The clinic is one of 31 organizations seeking to strengthen their financial capability coaching programs through the work of the Citi Foundation’s partner NeighborWorks America.

With coaching, Nicolas made critical changes.

“Right now I have my priorities set,” Nicolas said. Top on his new budget: rent, child care and transportation, while one-on-one counseling is helping him restore his credit and rebuild his savings.

'I do have a plan, and because of the coaching I’m getting, I’m more disciplined now when it comes to finances.'

A Measurement System Built Around Results

The results-oriented measurement system allows the Citi Foundation to focus on creating positive gains for individuals and their communities. And they can begin to understand how their efforts are helping nonprofit partners to transform and how all this is informing broader systemic change.

Maggie Grieve, NeighborWorks director of success measures, said she worked with the Citi Foundation to develop yardsticks for people’s financial status, habits of behavior and resilience, “things that hadn’t been easily measured before.”

The Foundation provided a $5 million grant to NeighborWorks to put the criteria into practice: selecting the 31 organizations whose financial coaches would be trained, establishing project objectives, planning training activities and setting benchmarks.

“The Citi Foundation really partnered with us to achieve mutual goals,” Grieve said. “We were able to demonstrate that significant numbers of low- and moderate-income people who participated were really able in less than a year to make progress toward their financial objectives.”

The 400 coaches trained under the program have served some 65,000 people in just two years.

Using Measurement & Results to Scale Impact

Third, the Foundation uses the results of its new measurement system to lay a solid foundation for scaling up impact.

The Citi Foundation hopes the new tracking system will show that its grant to NeighborWorks helped create a financial coaching model that can be used nationally to assist low- to moderate-income individuals in adopting positive financial behaviors that build and preserve their assets over time.

This investment is part of Citi and the Citi Foundation’s commitment to “financial inclusion” – ensuring widespread access to affordable, high-quality financial products, services and asset-building opportunities for individuals, families and communities.

The more people who become financially savvy, carry less debt and rack up more savings, like Ernst Nichols, the better for any community and for the national economy.

And finally, the Foundation goes beyond grants and numbers to leverage the expertise and resources of its people to enhance philanthropic efforts. Its Volunteer Management System identifies ways employees can help, then tracks what they do.

In 2012, Citi employees contributed more than 1.3 million volunteer hours in efforts they know made a difference. To learn more about optimizing your company’s community engagement programs, check out this upcoming webinar featuring IBM’s success in the “Community Partnerships” scoring dimension and Citi’s success with “Measurement and Strategy.” To find out more about the Measurement and Strategy dimension click here. To learn more about the Community Partnership dimension click here. Previously: The Civic 50: Why IBM's Integrated Commitments Make it America's Most Community-Minded Company About the Author Ilir Zherka is executive director of the National Conference on Citizenship and the author of Winning the Inside Game: The Handbook of Advocacy Strategies.

SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.