Immigration Has Become Unpopular
Foreigners ... immigrants are unpopular
Europe is struggling with immigration. The United States is struggling with
immigration. Migration has become a choice for millions.
But immigrants are unpopular and being blamed for all sorts of woes in
society ... mostly unfairly.
This is not new, but it is still a very potent source of societal discontent. And
worse, this discontent will also have an impact on international affairs, relief
and development assistance, trade agreements and international alliances.
Economic migration
With extreme poverty in a large part of the world, and stupendous economic
opportunity in other parts, it is not surprising that there are massive
migrations going on. Economic migration is not new. It has probably been
going on since prehistoric times ... but it is aggravated now by the terrible
failure of the relief and development sector in the “south”, and the amazing
recent wealth creation in the “north”.
Laws to limit migration imposed by the “north” can slow the flows but not reduce the pressure. The pressure to
migrate will not be reduced until there is progress in making a success of
socio-economic performance in the “south”.
People will take huge risks when life is already pretty much impossible, and
everything is hopeless.
Escaping from Ethiopia
Ethiopia under President Mengishdu was not easy ... and for some ethnic groups is
was especially bad ... and worse for people identified as being against the regime.
I knew a teacher who had this profile. In Europe or the USA, she would have been on
the fast track, and an asset to the educational establishment. But in Ethiopia she was
facing no job ... no money ... no future.
She had determined that she absolutely had to leave Ethiopia. She tried to get a
passport, but her money was stolen by the officials ... all of it. She was left with no
money and no passport.
With nothing, she decided to walk out of Addis Ababa over the mountains to Sudan
... to the refugee camps on the Sudan side of the border. I know she left. I don't think
she arrived. Hardly anybody did.
People with potential don't have a chance in far too much of the “south”. The
domination of peoples by the corrupt and powerful is feature of modern
governance and global society that is an absolute abomination ... and
widespread.
Why migrate?
Unless I am much mistaken, individuals and families migrate to “have a better
life”. It seems to make sense.
Though European countries, the United States do not really welcome
migrants, and leave most of them at the bottom of the economic and social
heap, the socio-economic conditions and quality of life is a whole lot better
than where the migrants came from.
The great migrations in North America from Europe in the 19th century and
early part of the 20th century had a lot to do with improving the economic
quality of life.
Other migrations in history have been to do with religious persecution. The
United States, at its founding, to its credit, made freedom of religion a basic
building block of its society.
Fleeing violence
Refugees and internally displaces people (IDPs) are mainly fleeing from
violence. The violence has all sorts of different underlying causes, but the
impact of people is devastating.
Refugees and IDPs
I have worked a lot in refugee and IDP affected areas. It is not a pretty picture ... and
the fact that refugee and IDP problems are widespread is a terrible measure of failure
of the relief and development community, the governance authorities and our
international community of leaders.
People rarely want to leave their homes ... but when they do it is usually because they
will die or be killed if they do not. This is not at all acceptable in a civilized world ...
but it is common in too many places.
Brain drain
A flow of intelligent educated people from poor places in the “south” with
little opportunity for economic success to rich places in the “north” where
there are huge economic opportunities is normal ... it is the way a market
economy works. Laws can be passed to stop the brain drain, and people can
be coerced to stay where they are ... but again, the pressure to move is not
reduced.
Human trafficking
Money is being made by all sorts of unsavory middlemen who engage in
human trafficking. There is human trafficking associated with prostitution and
the porn industry in its many forms. Though it is usually illegal, it is also
profitable, and there is money also to be made from “protection”. There is
also human trafficking associated with economic migration ... getting people
into Europe ... getting people into the USA. The activities are usually illegal,
but the rewards are substantial.
Constraining migration
Now that physical movement around the world is so quick and easy,
migration is now controlled by money and regulation. Getting into the
United States costs money for transport ... and perhaps help in getting
negotiating the system to get the right paperwork and approvals.
Thousands try to do an end run round the paperwork and regulations by
trying to get into the United States or Europe by boat or over some border
clandestinely. A large number are dying trying to do this.
In the poor “south” a lot of people are trying to emigrate. People want to ...
need to ... leave their homes because the living conditions are catastrophically
bad. What is better ... dying at home, or dying trying to reach somewhere
that offers some hope for a better quality of life?
Bad solution
There are different ways to control and manage the immigration problem.
More and more rules and regulations, and higher and higher walls around the
rich “north” is a bad solution ... if it is a solution at all.
The problem is not so much people wanting to come into the rich “north” but
wanting to ... needing to ... leave the poor “south”.
Good solution
Some people should migrate ... it is good for all. But most people should be
better off staying at home than migrating.
A much better solution to migration is to put an end to the poverty and
hunger and dysfunction of the economy in the poor “south”.
I know that the World Bank has been “fighting” poverty for the past two
decades, and they have made little progress. But that does not mean that
addressing poverty and hunger cannot be done ... merely that the World
Bank cannot do it.
Every community in the poor “south” should be helped to keep its people at
home, and to improve their living standards and quality of life. No blanket
solution for everyone ... but multiple individual solutions for each
community.
And if there is hope and prospect for progress in a community that is remote
and rural, then also the migration from rural to urban might also slow, if not
reverse.
|