image missing
Date: 2025-08-22 Page is: DBtxt003.php L0912-TVIA-2017-030000
Burgess Manuscript
True Value Impact Accounting
Re-Thinking Accountancy to Suit the 21st Century
PREVIOUS ... Open TVIA-020000 GO L0700-SN-BM-TVIA-2017 NEXT ... Open TVIA-040000
#3 - METRICS
TO MANAGE PROGRESS AND PERFORMANCE
The metrics for measuring and managing for the optimization of profit and ownership value are highly developed and sophisticated. Nothing like it exists to improve the happiness of society and the catastrophic degradation of the environment.

Resources are an Asset
No ... not so quick ... the matter of ownership is a lot more complicated!

One would think that natural resources would be an asset of the community, but sadly, the rule of law may have preempted what seems like common sense so that the legal reality becomes something very different.

METRICS and MANAGEMENT


Without metrics … NO management

Conventional metrics give wrong signals

You manage what you measure … but you had better measure the right things. Measuring profit means better profit performance, but not measuring social progress means relatively poor social progress and not measuring environmental impact means relatively poor environmental performance. Because measurement is difficult should not mean the issue is unimportant!

Metrics for implementing entities

There are important differences between implementing entities and reporting entities. For a small simple business organization they can be one and the same thing, but for larger complex organizations they are most likely to be very different.

The management information needed to implement in the most efficient way is more detailed and granular than the information that is needed to report the performance of the organization to outsiders and those merely interested in strategic performance.

Metrics for reporting entities

Metrics should be agnostic

Progress and performance measurement should be implemented whatever the entity. The framing of the system of measurement should be the same wherever it is used … and it should be used everywhere.

CONVENTIONAL METRICS


Corporate Performance

Corporate performance is mainly about profit performance and increase in the price of the stock … and the metrics to measure this profit performance are very very sophisticated both at the level of the analytical cost and management accounting and all the other supporting management information and analytics. There is no management information of equal sophistication about the impact on human / social capital and the impact on the environment / natural capital.

There have been many initiatives in the past few years to encourage more reporting of social responsibility, sustainability, etc and to encourage responsible investment … initiatives like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Integrated Reporting (IR), Principles for Responsible Investing (PRI) and others … but none of these initiatives up to now has addressed the issue of how to number this reporting in a generally acceptable low cost manner.

The big lesson from corporate performance metrics is that metrics do work and work very well to improve performance. The challenge is for corporate performance metrics to be broadened so that ALL the impacts of corporate activity are taken into account, and not just the profit component and its very good impact investors.

Economic Analysis

Economic analysis has a very different framing from that of corporate performance. The subject of economic analysis is more complex than corporate performance analysis, and the data far less reliable. Nevertheless economists have been able to describe the state of the economy quite well for many years. Economic analysis has been much less successful in describing the behavior … the cause and effect … that has been driving the changes in state of the economy over time.

Many of the issues associate with economic inequality have been described by economists for many years … even decades … but there is little agreement about what exactly has caused this and what to do to make the economy more equitable. Correlation is interesting, but not enough to get to better decisions.

Worse, a singular focus on GDP growth to solve economic problems begs the question of how economic growth also grows environmental degradation and profit growth is often associated with reduced employment and reduced payrolls … and of course there is little consensus about the impact of changes in tax rates on corporate behavior and economic performance more broadly.

Investment Analysis

For most of recent history investment analysis has been all about corporate profit and what corporate profit projections do for stock prices. Stock market prices correlate very reliably with the net present value (NPV) of future flows of profits.

Initiatives like the UN Principles for Responsible Investing launched in 2007 (now PRI) are encouraging investment analysis that includes a lot more than just profit. They support the idea that environmental, sustainability and governance (ESG) are important as well as simple the raw profit performance.

There is a growing interest in doing better investment analysis that goes beyond simple financial analysis … but as of now, little agreement on how to do it … and to the extent that better methods are emerging they are often of a proprietary nature and being used to give competitive advantage to the owner!

Impact Reporting

There are now thousands of companies that are publishing sustainability reports, up from just a very few a decade ago. While financial reports can be a very quick read, and show very clearly the financial state of the company and its profit performance, sustainability reports are usually very long and many many words, stories and pictures and rather little to show much about the total impact of the company's activities on human / social capital and on the environmental / natural capital.

Better impact reporting is desirable and better impact reporting is possible.

BETTER METRICS


Introduction to True Value Impact Accounting (TVIA)

Characteristics of TVIA

Peter Drucker famously said 'You manage what you measure' and there is much evidence that this is true. It is also therefore essential that all the important things that get measured, and it is vital that the measures are not 'gamed' in inappropriate ways to gain corrupt advantage. Transparency, accounting, audit, and accountability

There is a lot of talk about transparency and accountability, but in practice almost the only place where this is practiced is between the stock market and the reporting of corporate profits. Audit is mandated in this part of the reporting ecosystem in order to protect investors from company operators seeking to lie about their company's financial performance, and companies are expected to do accounting using Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Better reporting about social and environmental impact

Relevant transparency, accounting, audit, and accountability are missing when it comes to the impact company operators are having on society and the environment. This is the essential purpose of TVIA.

Caveat … wrong metrics are worse than no metrics

Metrics are very powerful, and accordingly it is important that the metrics being used are suited to the situation. This is one of the reasons that data flows should be fast and feedback about progress timely. Unintended consequences should be responded to very rapidly and the causality identified.

Core Concepts

Double entry accounting has been used for hundreds of years, and is used by every (well managed) organization on the planet. TrueValueMetrics has a similar structure and complements existing double entry systems to make them much more relevant and useful for management in the 21st century.

The core concepts are derived from natural science and engineering, and from the essential core structure of double entry accounting and the classification of accounts into balance sheet accounts and profit and loss accounts.

Double Entry

The idea of double entry accounting goes back many hundreds of years. It was carefully described in the late 15th century by Luca Pacioli, but there is much other evidence that it was being used a long time before that. This system of accounting was very reliable and enabled merchants to give an account of their transactions to the investors that had funded their ventures,

Classification of Accounts

The key classification of accounts is the differentiation between BALANCE SHEET accounts and PROFIT AND LOSS accounts. This is the way STATE and FLOWS are accounted for in conventional double entry accountancy and is the way in which value metrics for everything should be designed. In this classification:
  • Assets and Liabilities are Balance Sheet accounts
  • Cost or expenses and Revenues are Profit and Loss accounts.
The difference between total assets and total liabilities is Net Assets … which is the value of the business to the owner … sometimes referred to as the Owners' Equity.


The difference between total costs and total revenues is the Profit (or Loss) … profit when the revenues exceed costs, and loss when costs exceed revenues.

Cost, Price and Value

The general public, and indeed many experts including economists conflate cost, price and value. They are not one and the same thing. They are very different.

Better decision making requires a lot more clarity about what is cost, what is price and what is value.

For example, a patient pays a price for some healthcare intervention. The cost may be something very different, made up of the wages costs of doctors, nurses, technicians, etc. and the cost of equipment, the cost of space, the cost of medications, the cost of admin, etc etc. The customer (the patient) only knows the price, which may or may not include a profit (or indeed a loss) which may be reasonable or not. Value is a completely different thing. If the intervention saves the patient's life, the value is essentially priceless!

The delta between price and cost is profit.

The delta between value and cost is value add.

The delta between value and price measures how good a buy is for the customer.

Advertising does not bring clarity for the customer, rather confusion and the idea that more purchasing will improve the customer's quality of life … whether or not this has any reality in fact!

State and Flow

Initial state … Activities or Flows … Ending State

A core idea in conventional double entry accounting and also in TVIA is that the impact of flows or activities changes the STATE from what it was initially to what the STATE becomes post activity.

In conventional money profit accounting the Balance Sheet at the beginning of the period (BOP) is changed according to the activities reflected in the period Profit and Loss Account to become the Balance Sheet at the end of the period (EOP)

This concept is very similar to the ideas throughout science and in particular in many of the industrial processes based on engineering thermodynamics, chemical engineering, etc. The beginning STATE changes because of some process to become the ending STATE. The value add is the delta between the two states.

Measuring Performance

Progress and Efficiency

Progress

There is PROGRESS when SOCIAL CAPITAL increases. Over the past two hundred years there has been progress, but profit progress has been more than social progress and there has been massive degradation of the natural environment. True progress must be measured by comparing the STATE of ALL the CAPITALS at the beginning of a period with the state of the capitals are the end of the period.

There is power in the double entry construct and the classification of accounts that hgas been used by accountants for hundreds of years. This construct makes it possible to measure profit without having detailed information about the individual transactions flowing through the profit and loss account. When the balance sheet at the end of the period (EoP) exceeds the balance sheet at the beginning of the period (BoP) there is a profit for the period. No other detail information is needed! This idea may be applied in determining the progress of any reporting entity, and this same idea may be applied for ALL capitals in the socio-enviro-economic system as well as simply the capitals associated with a single business.

Thus, the progress of a PLACE is the improvement in the STATE of the PLACE from the BoP to the EoP … where the STATE of the PLACE is the totality of the Social Capital (Human and Relational), the Natural Capital and the Created Capitals (Physical, Financial, Knowledge, Institutional and Cultural).

Note the idea that ALL the CAPITALS must be taken into account. The way in which the capitals are segmented does not matter when measuring progress.

Efficiency

The modern economy has worked well to generate massive financial wealth for some people but rather little for most people, and this increase in financial wealth has been achieved at the expense of nature and dangerous degradation of the environment.

In the aggregate, SOCIAL CAPITAL has increased, but NATURAL CAPITAL has been seriously degraded. This degradation has been of such a magnitude that many of the systems associated with natural capital are no longer able to maintain a sustainable equilibrium. The modern large scale industrial system is extremely inefficient. It requires an excessive amount of natural capital to enable the growth of social capital.

Because almost all the management focus has been on improving profit performance, the broader issue of socio-enviro-economic system efficiency has been ignored. That is the impact on society and the impact on the environment has been ignored as financial performance has improved.

Performance requires more information. Some activities are more efficient at producing progress than others … in other words some activities use more resources in order get progress than other activities.

Many … probably most … not for profit performance analysis has a focus on relating resources used to activities undertaken … essentially the foundation for profit and loss reporting. Whether or not there has been any progress as a result of these activities is usually ignored.

Units of Account

MORE POWERFUL THAN MONETIZING IMPACT

Conventional financial accounting uses money as its unit of account, and there are established methods for the use of multiple currencies when this is needed because of the nature of the business.

With TVM, multiple UNITS OF ACCOUNT are used in a similar way to account for the way in which different activities impact ALL the CAPITALS that make up the SOCIO-ENVIRO-ECONOMIC SYSTEM. This is more powerful and more flexible than the idea of valuing everything using money and markets

STANDARD VALUE PROFILES

AN OPEN ACCESS DATABASE FOR STANDARD VALUE PROFILES FOR EVERYTHING

STANDARD VALUE PROFILE DATABASE ...CRITICAL DATA ABOUT THE TRUE COSTS AND VALUE OF EVERY PRODUCT ON THE PLANET

Well managed companies know a lot about every product that is flowing into their organizations and being produced for sale. There is nothing like this level of knowedgle about the products that are flowing through society and having impact on people and the environment.

In companies one technique for documenting knowledge about products is the idea of Standard Costs which is powerful and relatively low cost. In the TVIA data architecture, the equivalent are STANDARD VALUE PROFILES.

Using Measurements

Reporting Entities

REPORTING FOR ORGANIZATIONS, PEOPLE, PLACES, PROCESSES, PRODUCTS, STREAMS ... also PROJECTS, PROGRAMS and POLICIES

In conventional accounting there are established rules for reporting for the reporting entity. For example, all corporate business organizations report financial performance including the transactions that relate to the organization but excluding transactions that are outsie the 'reporting envelope'. Rules have been established to handle complex corporate structures involving subsidiaries that are both wholly owned, and those with outside stockholders. In TVIA these ideas are expanded to enable coherent reporting not only for the business organization but for all the various entities that make up the complete socio-enviro-economic system.

External Reporting

External Reporting for Compliance

Some organizations are required by law to report on their operations to outsiders according to a prescribed methodology. Mostly the outsiders that are being 'protected' by this reporting are the investors. A requirement to protect the public at large is rudimentary, at best.

Financial performance

Public companies are typically required to report their financial performance according to generally accepted accounting standards which vary somewhat depending on the jurisdiction.

Social and environmental impact

Increasingly there are moves to required the reporting of social and environmental impact, but the methodology for this is not well developed.

Performance Improvement / Management

The data required to manage an implementing entity effectively reflects the same 'facts' but the presentation is very different. The data needs to be presented in a granular way and rapidly so that decisions can be made to improve performance.

Feedback

In a high performance management system there is rapid measurement are quick feedback so that the impact of decisions can be observed and further follow up decisions taken.

Cost and Management Accounting

Cost and management accounting is central to most good corporate management systems. Care needs to be taken so that the data is useful for decision making. Too much data often reduces the effectiveness of the data.

Standard Cost Accounting

One way to reduce the amount of data while still getting value from the information is to use a system of standard costs, and variance analysis. This enables thoughtful decisions to be made about product design and manufacturing processes that do not easily emerge from actual cost accounting.

Units of Account

How measurements are made is important. In science this matter has been treated with great rigor, but in the context of business, finance and society the nature of measurement is anything but rigorous.

Must be better than money

Money is not a good measure because it fluctuates in size. It's size changes in all sorts of unpredictable ways. Its size fluctuates depending on market conditions, and money quantities change depending on market conditions … an unresolvable circular condition! Trying to express the progress and performance of anything simply by using a money metric cannot work

Three principal reporting metrics

Instead of money as the measure, tather there should be measures that are grounded in the reality of the socio-enviro-economic system. In fact there should be three measures … that is units of account … one for the social dimension, one for the environmental dimension and one for the economic dimension.

Existing subsection metrics

These three main dimensions of the system are comprised of many sub-sections. Many of the sub-sections already have meaningful and rigorous metrics, but the prevailing systems of reporting, there are no relatively simple ways of consolidating all the metrics into a single coherent measure for each of the three main dimensions of the system.

Standard Value Profiles

Standard Value Profiles for Everything

Show Life Cycle Impact

The Balance Sheet for a company tells the history of the company up to that point in time. Projections of the Profit and Loss Account into the future give an estimate of the potential of the company into the future, which can be presented in the form of a Net Present Value.

The Standard Value Profile (SVP) for a product reflects the history of a product all the way through its supply chain in much the same what that a company balance sheet accumulates the story of the company into the current period balance sheet. .

In addition the SVP projects the impact of the product (1) during its use and (2) when it is discarded and goes into the waste chain in much the same way that the Net Present Value of a company is computed by reference to the future flows of profit.

Applications of TVIA

TVIA should be used to account not only for the money profit impact transactions, but also for the impact that there is on society and the environment.

A rapidly growing movement to implement impact reporting has emerged during the past 20 years … initiatives like the GRI, IR, IRIS, and SASB … all of which are useful steps forward, but generally they promote more reporting of social and environmental impacts without improving the underlying architecture of the accounting systems.

By integrating the core concepts referred to above into the conventional accounting systems, the essential metrics to make better decision to achieve a better world may be implemented with little or no incremental cost.
PREVIOUS ... Open TVIA-020000 GO L0700-SN-BM-TVIA-2017 NEXT ... Open TVIA-040000
SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.