Watch 4 Decades of Inequality Drive American Cities Apart ... The biggest metropolitan areas are now the most unequal.
In 1980, highly paid workers in Binghamton, N.Y., earned about four and a half times what low-wage workers there did. The gap between them, in a region full of I.B.M. executives and manufacturing jobs, was about the same as the gap between the workers near the top and the bottom in metro New York.
Since then, the two regions have diverged. I.B.M. shed jobs in Binghamton. Other manufacturing disappeared, too. High-paying work in the new knowledge economy concentrated in New York, and so did well-educated workers. As a result, by one measure, wage inequality today is much higher in New York than it is in Binghamton.
Ratio of 90th-percentile wages to 10th-percentile wages in 195 metro areas
↑ MORE INEQUALITY
100,000
200,000
500,000
1m
2m
5m
10m
15m
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
New York
New York
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Chicago
Chicago
Dallas
Dallas
Houston
Houston
Philadelphia
Philadelphia
Washington, D.C.
Washington, D.C.
Miami
Miami
Atlanta
Atlanta
San Francisco
San Francisco
Boston
Boston
Phoenix
Phoenix
Riverside, Calif.
Riverside, Calif.
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn
Seattle
Seattle
Minneapolis-St. Paul
Minneapolis-St. Paul
San Diego-Carlsbad
San Diego-Carlsbad
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
St. Louis
St. Louis
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford
San Antonio-New Braunfels
San Antonio-New Braunfels
Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh
Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade
Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade
Kansas City
Kansas City
Las Vegas
Las Vegas
Cincinnati
Cincinnati
Cleveland-Elyria
Cleveland-Elyria
Austin-Round Rock
Austin-Round Rock
Indianapolis
Indianapolis
Nashville
Nashville
Columbus
Columbus
San Jose
San Jose
Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News
Providence-Warwick
Providence-Warwick
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis
Greensboro
Greensboro
Oklahoma City
Oklahoma City
Jacksonville
Jacksonville
Raleigh
Raleigh
New Orleans-Metairie
New Orleans-Metairie
Louisville/jefferson County
Louisville/jefferson County
Richmond
Richmond
Greenville
Greenville
Memphis
Memphis
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford
Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls
Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls
Birmingham-Hoover
Birmingham-Hoover
Rochester
Rochester
Omaha-Council Bluffs
Omaha-Council Bluffs
Tucson
Tucson
Urban Honolulu
Urban Honolulu
Fresno
Fresno
Fairfield, Conn.
Fairfield, Conn.
Knoxville
Knoxville
Dayton
Dayton
Worcester
Worcester
Grand Rapids-Wyoming
Grand Rapids-Wyoming
Albuquerque
Albuquerque
Bakersfield
Bakersfield
New Haven-Milford
New Haven-Milford
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
Albany-Schenectady-Troy
Albany-Schenectady-Troy
Mcallen-Edinburg-Mission
Mcallen-Edinburg-Mission
El Paso
El Paso
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton
Baton Rouge
Baton Rouge
Columbia
Columbia
Sarasota
Sarasota
Charleston-North Charleston
Charleston-North Charleston
Stockton-Lodi
Stockton-Lodi
Akron
Akron
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway
Harrisburg
Harrisburg
Cape Coral-Fort Myers
Cape Coral-Fort Myers
Boise City
Boise City
Colorado Springs
Colorado Springs
Des Moines-West Des Moines
Des Moines-West Des Moines
Syracuse
Syracuse
Lakeland-Winter Haven
Lakeland-Winter Haven
Toledo
Toledo
Jackson
Jackson
Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach
Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach
Wichita
Wichita
Spokane-Spokane Valley
Spokane-Spokane Valley
Springfield
Springfield
Provo-Orem
Provo-Orem
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville
Youngstown-Warren-Boardman
Youngstown-Warren-Boardman
Lafayette
Lafayette
Modesto
Modesto
Augusta-Richmond County
Augusta-Richmond County
Lancaster
Lancaster
Chattanooga
Chattanooga
Portland-South Portland
Portland-South Portland
Asheville
Asheville
Santa Rosa
Santa Rosa
Scranton-Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton
Scranton-Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton
Salinas
Salinas
Corpus Christi
Corpus Christi
Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent
Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers
Lansing-East Lansing
Lansing-East Lansing
Visalia-Porterville
Visalia-Porterville
Anchorage
Anchorage
Reno
Reno
Santa Maria-Santa Barbara
Santa Maria-Santa Barbara
York-Hanover
York-Hanover
Brownsville-Harlingen
Brownsville-Harlingen
Shreveport-Bossier City
Shreveport-Bossier City
Huntsville
Huntsville
Reading
Reading
Mobile
Mobile
Springfield
Springfield
Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton
Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton
Canton-Massillon
Canton-Massillon
Beaumont-Port Arthur
Beaumont-Port Arthur
Kalamazoo-Portage
Kalamazoo-Portage
Montgomery
Montgomery
Trenton
Trenton
Fort Wayne
Fort Wayne
Eugene
Eugene
Ann Arbor
Ann Arbor
Manchester
Manchester
Ocala
Ocala
Biloxi
Biloxi
Rockford
Rockford
Roanoke
Roanoke
Fort Collins
Fort Collins
Fayetteville
Fayetteville
Clarksville
Clarksville
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lubbock
Lubbock
Erie
Erie
Wilmington
Wilmington
Santa Cruz-Watsonville
Santa Cruz-Watsonville
Utica-Rome
Utica-Rome
Norwich-New London
Norwich-New London
Olympia-Tumwater
Olympia-Tumwater
Atlantic City-Hammonton
Atlantic City-Hammonton
Lynchburg
Lynchburg
Gainesville
Gainesville
Bremerton-Silverdale
Bremerton-Silverdale
Amarillo
Amarillo
Yakima
Yakima
Waco
Waco
Binghamton, N.Y.
Binghamton, N.Y.
Chico
Chico
Topeka
Topeka
Tyler
Tyler
Tuscaloosa
Tuscaloosa
Burlington-South Burlington
Burlington-South Burlington
Medford
Medford
Bellingham
Bellingham
Champaign-Urbana
Champaign-Urbana
Florence
Florence
Elkhart-Goshen
Elkhart-Goshen
Springfield
Springfield
Charleston
Charleston
Racine
Racine
Saginaw
Saginaw
Lafayette-West Lafayette
Lafayette-West Lafayette
Redding
Redding
Joplin
Joplin
Columbia
Columbia
Bloomington
Bloomington
Muskegon
Muskegon
Yuba City
Yuba City
Oshkosh-Neenah
Oshkosh-Neenah
Janesville-Beloit
Janesville-Beloit
State College
State College
Odessa
Odessa
Jackson
Jackson
Monroe
Monroe
Eau Claire
Eau Claire
Pueblo
Pueblo
Niles-Benton Harbor
Niles-Benton Harbor
Johnstown
Johnstown
Wausau
Wausau
Wichita Falls
Wichita Falls
Glens Falls
Glens Falls
Mansfield
Mansfield
St. Joseph
St. Joseph
Muncie
Muncie
Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville
Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville
Sheboygan
Sheboygan
Kankakee
Kankakee
Decatur
Decatur
Lima
Lima
Gadsden
Gadsden
Parkersburg-Vienna
Parkersburg-Vienna
In 2015
METRO POPULATION →
Dots represent metro areas; names are shortened for clarity.·Analysis of census and American Community Survey data by Jaison Abel and Richard Deitz, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
What has happened over the last four decades is only partly a story of New York’s rise as a global hub and Binghamton’s struggles. Economic inequality has been rising everywhere in the United States. But it has been rising much more in the booming places that promise hefty incomes to engineers, lawyers and innovators. And those places today are also the largest metros in the country: New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Jose, Houston, Washington.
This chart, using data from a recent analysis by Jaison Abel and Richard Deitz of the New York Fed, captures several dynamics that have remade the U.S. economy since 1980. Thriving and stagnant places are pulling apart from each other. And within the most prosperous regions, inequality is widening to new extremes. That this inequality now so clearly correlates with city size — the largest metros are the most unequal — also shows how changes in the economy are both rewarding and rattling what we have come to think of as “superstar cities.”
In these places, inequality and economic growth now go hand in hand.
Back in 1980, Binghamton’s wage inequality made the region among the most unequal in the country, according to the Fed analysis. It ranked 20th of the 195 metros shown here as measured by comparing the wages of workers at the 90th percentile with those at the 10th percentile of the local wage distribution, a measure that captures the breadth of disparities in the local economy without focusing solely on the very top. In 1980, New York City was slightly less unequal, ranking 44th by this measure.
Forty years ago, none of the country’s 10 largest metros were among the 20 most unequal. By 2015, San Francisco, New York, Houston, Los Angeles, Dallas and Washington had jumped onto that list, pulled there by the skyrocketing wages of high-skilled workers. Binghamton over the same period had become one of the least unequal metros, in part because many I.B.M. executives and well-paid manufacturing workers had vanished from its economy.
In effect, something we often think of as undesirable (high inequality) has been a signal of something positive in big cities (a strong economy). And in Binghamton, relatively low inequality has been a signal of a weak economy. (The Fairfield-Bridgeport, Conn., metro stands out in either era because the deep poverty of its urban core is surrounded by particularly rich suburbs.)
These patterns are hard to reconcile with appeals today for reducing inequality, both within big cities and across the country. What are Americans supposed to make of the fact that more high-paying jobs by definition widen inequality? Should New Yorkers be O.K. with growing inequality in New York if it’s driven by rising wages for high-skilled workers, and not falling wages for low-skilled ones?
“That’s more of a political question,” said Nathaniel Baum-Snow, an economist at the University of Toronto. “That’s a question of what we decide our values should be as a society.”
Tom VanHeuvelen, a sociologist at the University of Minnesota who has also researched these patterns, said: “It seems obvious to me that it doesn’t need to be the way that it is right now. This isn’t the only inevitable outcome we have when we think about the relationship between cities, affluence and inequality.”
Economists say that the same forces that are driving economic growth in big cities are also responsible for inequality. And those forces have accumulated and reinforced each other since 1980.
High-skilled workers have been in increasing demand, and increasingly rewarded. In New York, the real wages for workers at the 10th percentile grew by about 15 percent between 1980 and 2015, according to the Fed researchers. For the median worker, they grew by about 40 percent. For workers at the 90th percentile, they nearly doubled.
That’s partly because when highly skilled workers and their firms cluster in the same place today, they’re all more productive, research shows. And in major cities, they’re also tied directly into the global economy.
“If you’re someone who has skills for the new economy, your skills turn out to be more valuable in bigger cities, in a way that wasn’t true 30 to 40 years ago,” Mr. Baum-Snow said.
It’s no surprise, then, that high-skilled workers have been sorting into big, prosperous cities, compounding the advantages of these places (and draining less prosperous places of these workers).
At the same time, automation, globalization and the decline of manufacturing have decimated well-paying jobs that once required no more than a high school diploma. That has hollowed out both the middle class in big cities and the economic engine in smaller cities. The result is that changes in the economy have disproportionately rewarded some places and harmed others, pushing their trajectories apart.
Add one more dynamic to all of this: Inequality has been rising nationally since the 1980s. But because the Bay Area and New York regions already had more than their fair share of one-percenters (or 10 percenters) in 1980, the national growth in income inequality has been magnified in those places.
“We’ve had this pulling apart of the overall income distribution,” said Robert Manduca, a Ph.D. student in sociology and social policy at Harvard who has found that about half of the economic divergence between different parts of the country is explained by trends in national inequality. “That overall pulling apart has had very different effects in different places, based on which kinds of people were already living in those places.”
Mr. Manduca says national policies like reinvigorating antitrust laws would be most effective at reducing inequality (the consolidation of many industries has meant, among other things, that smaller cities that once had company headquarters have lost those jobs, sometimes to big cities).
It is hard to imagine local officials combating all these forces. Increases to the minimum wage are likely to be swamped — at least in this measure — by the gains of workers at the top. Policies that tax high earners more to fund housing or education for the poor would redistribute some of the uneven gains of the modern economy. But they would not alter the fact that this economy values an engineer so much more than a line cook.
“If you brought the bottom up, it would be a better world,” said Richard Florida, a professor at the University of Toronto who has written extensively about these trends. “But you’d still have a big rise in wage inequality.”
------------------------------------------------------------------
Emily Badger writes about cities and urban policy for The Upshot from the Washington bureau. She's particularly interested in housing, transportation and inequality — and how they're all connected. She joined The Times in 2016 from The Washington Post. @emilymbadger
Kevin Quealy is a graphics editor and reporter. He writes and makes charts for The Upshot about a range of topics, including sports, politics, health care and income inequality. @KevinQ
A version of this article appears in print on Dec. 3, 2019, Section B, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Big Cities Have Prospered, But Inequality Has Soared. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
Editors’ Picks
6 Takeaways From Melania Trump’s Unauthorized Biography
90,000 Packages Disappear Daily in N.Y.C. Is Help on the Way?
Does Who You Are at 7 Determine Who You Are at 63?
By Emily Badger and Kevin Quealy
Dec. 2, 2019
| The text being discussed is available at
and
| |