![]() | |||||||||
HOME | SN-BRIEFS |
SYSTEM OVERVIEW |
EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT |
PROGRESS PERFORMANCE |
PROBLEMS POSSIBILITIES |
STATE CAPITALS |
FLOW ACTIVITIES |
FLOW ACTORS |
PETER BURGESS |
SiteNav | SitNav (0) | SitNav (1) | SitNav (2) | SitNav (3) | SitNav (4) | SitNav (5) | SitNav (6) | SitNav (7) | SitNav (8) |
Date: 2025-05-11 Page is: DBtxt001.php txt00009514 |
Country ... Venezuela |
Burgess COMMENTARY |
The 2002 Venezuelan Coup the Media Conveniently Forgot This documented episode informs much of what's unfolding in Venezuela today. As the economic crisis in Venezuela worsens, a number of recent media pieces detailing President Nicolás Maduro's crackdown on his opposition paint him as a paranoid despot who unjustifiably blames the U.S. for trying to undermine him. While Maduro's recent arrests of opposition leaders may indeed be politically motivated and unjustified, a rather glaring piece of context is left out of almost all American media accounts of the ongoing crisis: namely the fact that such a 'conspiracy' actually did take place in 2002: Venezuela Coup Linked to Bush Team The failed coup in Venezuela was closely tied to senior officials in the US government, the Observer has established. They have long histories in the 'dirty wars' of the 1980s, and links to death squads working in Central America at that time. Washington's involvement in the turbulent events that briefly removed left-wing leader Hugo Chavez from power last weekend resurrects fears about US ambitions in the hemisphere. As Scott Wilson of the Washington Postwould explain in an interview years later:
There remains doubt as to the extent the CIA played a direct part in the Venezuelan coup but there's little doubt, as the New York Timesconfirmed in 2004, they gave it their tacit endorsement. And while this fact does not justify Maduro's crackdown, it certainly provides a very material piece of historical context for any discussion as to the likelihood foreign elements are attempting to undermine the constitutionally elected government of Maduro. But nowhere would this shameful episode be mentioned in report after report of the current crisis: First, Univision-Disney joint venture Fusion:
The Economist: VENEZUELA’S CRACKDOWN: A SLOW-MOTION COUP
Bloomberg: SQUATTERS GRAB VENEZUELA OPPOSITION PARTY OFFICE AMID CRACKDOWN
CNN: U.S. CALLS COUP CLAIMS BY VENEZUELAN PRESIDENT 'LUDICROUS'
The State Department has repeatedly rejected such accusations. Last year, it said Maduro's claim that U.S. officials had conspired against the Venezuelan government was 'baseless and false.' The Washington Post: VENEZUELANS ON EDGE AFTER CARACAS MAYOR ARRESTED ON ‘ENDLESS COUP’ CLAIM
Left unmentioned in all these reports: 'an international plot including Colombian paramilitary forces, Venezuelan expatriates in Miami, right-wing Spanish politicians and the United States' did indeed overthrow the socialist government of Venezuela just over a decade ago. While not necessarily a lie, omitting that such an event took place in April 2002 would be like covering fears of an al Qaeda plot to fly planes into the New York skyline without mentioning September 2001. Even if one doesn't think the CIA or any of the same actors Maduro is cracking down on now had anything to do with 2002, it still merits a mention for the simple fact that Maduro and his confederates do believe this. It's the animating cause behind much of their paranoia, justified or not. But Foreign Policy's Peter Wilson and the New Yorker's Boris Munoz would take this omission one step further by completely rewriting history altogether. Without irony, both would mock Chavez for making allegations of coup conspiracies without bothering to mention that one actually happened: FOREIGN POLICY | EMPTY SHELVES AND COUP PLOTS IN VENEZUELA
THE NEW YORKER | OBAMA VS. CHAVISMO
Evidently, being illegally removed from office by right-wing forces in concert with the CIA is not enough proof that right-wing forces in concert with the CIA are attempting to illegally remove one from office. Surely, this goes beyond omission into an outright lie. But so it goes in what Gore Vidal referred to as the 'United States of Amnesia.' History is this thing long ago where the US 'made some mistakes' but today the US government operates entirely above board. State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki found this out the hard way in a recent press conference when she asserted the US has a 'long-standing policy' against interfering in foreign governments that was met with audible laughter by an otherwise friendly press core.
Maduro may be paranoid. He may have gone too far in preventing a repeat of 2002, but to constantly reference fears of a plot to overthrow the socialist government of Venezuela without mentioning that such an event did indeed take place in our very recent history is to bury inconvenient facts of history to fit a clean narrative. It leaves the reader misinformed and whitewashes a very real, documented episode that informs much of what's unfolding in Venezuela today. An adapted version of this article first appeared on Citations Needed. Adam Johnson is a freelance journalist; formerly he was a founder of the hardware startup Brightbox. Follow him on Twitter at @adamjohnsonny |
By Adam Johnson / AlterNet
March 20, 2015 |
The text being discussed is available at http://www.alternet.org/world/2002-venezuelan-coup-media-conveniently-forgot and |
SITE COUNT< Blog Counters Reset to zero January 20, 2015 | TrueValueMetrics (TVM) is an Open Source / Open Knowledge initiative. It has been funded by family and friends. TVM is a 'big idea' that has the potential to be a game changer. The goal is for it to remain an open access initiative. |
WE WANT TO MAINTAIN AN OPEN KNOWLEDGE MODEL | A MODEST DONATION WILL HELP MAKE THAT HAPPEN | |
The information on this website may only be used for socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and limited low profit purposes
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. |