image missing
Date: 2024-04-28 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00020918

Public Investment
Infrastructure

OP-ED ECONOMY & LABOR ... The Real Impact of the $1.2 Trillion Infrastructure Bill Will Be Felt Locally

Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess
Original article: https://truthout.org/articles/the-real-impact-of-the-1-2-trillion-infrastructure-bill-will-be-felt-locally/
OP-ED ECONOMY & LABOR The Real Impact of the $1.2 Trillion Infrastructure Bill Will Be Felt Locally


A Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) train is seen at the Lake Merritt station in Oakland, California, on January 13, 2021. BART trains are just one local public transit system that stand to gain massively from the infrastructure bill. JANE TYSKA/DIGITAL FIRST MEDIA/EAST BAY TIMES VIA GETTY IMAGES

BY Sasha Abramsky, Truthout PUBLISHED August 21, 2021

The $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill that passed earlier this month fell short of many progressive aspirations, shrinking to fit Republican demands. However, if implemented wisely (in conjunction with the $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill), it could still open the door to important new possibilities for U.S. governance, in which the feds, cities and states learn to better cooperate with each other to use their economic leverage to ramp up large-scale (and long-overdue) social investments.

After all, $1 trillion-plus is a lot of money. If and when the 2,700-page bill becomes law, vast sums will start flowing to build or upgrade bridges, roads and sewer systems — traditional brick-and-mortar infrastructure investments. Even a small state like Mississippi stands to gain upwards of $3 billion for its highways and hundreds of millions of additional dollars to repair bridges.

But it isn’t just about bricks and mortar. The bill will also expand broadband access, improve cybersecurity, set up huge networks of electric vehicle charging stations around the country and clean up polluted superfund sites. There are provisions for improving wildlife crossing points on roads, for creating better pedestrian and bicycle routes in cities and for tackling invasive species.

As is the way with big spending bills like this, much of the actual implementation will occur over the coming years at a city and state level. That’s critical to remember, because, for decades now, many localities have failed to invest adequately in infrastructure, preferring instead to cut taxes and to defer needed improvements. The result has been dilapidation, with the U.S. ranking 13th out of advanced economies in the quality of its infrastructure, according to a much-quoted study by the World Economic Forum. In 2019, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) reported that state and local government infrastructure investments had declined from a high of 3 percent of the country’s GDP in the 1960s to less than 2 percent a half century later. Making matters worse, the CBPP researchers found, was that the federal government was also pulling back on such investments. The result has been akin to what, in earlier decades, the economist John Kenneth Galbraith derided as “public squalor, private affluence” — a society with a glut of wealthy people living in wealthy neighborhoods, surrounded by a crumbling public infrastructure that they have largely opted out of.

Now, finally, that trend may be in the process of being reversed.

Cities, in particular, stand to gain massively from the infrastructure bill, with an array of ambitious public transport expansions ready to go. In northern California, for example, the Bay Area’s BART trains are soon to be extended down to the San Jose area. And across the country, in Boston, a coalition of business leaders recently unveiled a sweeping plan to use infrastructure dollars to massively upgrade the city’s public transit system, to set in place an all-electric bus fleet, and to boost local investments already underway in climate change mitigation methods, such as improving culverts and dams to better resist flood surges, and investing in high-tech coastal and weather monitoring systems.

Many older cities will use some of the dollars coming their way to update water systems that are reliant on lead pipes. In fact, fully $15 billion is specifically ear-marked for this, allowing Chicago — which had already started work on creating pilot programs, using its own funds, to remove lead pipes in some neighborhoods — and other cities a once-in-a-generation chance to remove these dangerous, antiquated pipes.

For western states, billions of dollars allocated for water infrastructure investments will allow them to increase their storage facilities, upgrade their dams and invest in state-of-the-art desalination projects. Given the dire drought situation in the West and Southwest, which recently triggered unprecedented restrictions on Colorado River water distribution, such investments are both long overdue and also increasingly vital for the western states’ booming populations. These projects won’t, of course, solve the water crisis by themselves, but they will at least allow states a fighting chance to invest more in long-term strategies to mitigate this growing calamity.

For decades now, many localities have failed to invest adequately in infrastructure, preferring instead to cut taxes and to defer needed improvements. For southern states, which have generally lagged on building up rural infrastructure in recent years as their political leaders have instead focused on tax cuts, the bill offers an accelerated move toward broadband access that is, in some ways, comparable to the rural electrification projects of the New Deal. In Georgia, for example, which ranks near the top of state lists for internet access, but which has a large urban-rural divide, $100 million will become available for rural broadband expansion. A similar amount will go for broadband access in Mississippi, which ranks near the bottom for internet access, according to a U.S. News survey.

This something-for-everybody approach explains why the infrastructure bill enjoys such strong public support, and why, despite the GOP’s desire to hamstring the Biden administration at every turn, Mitch McConnell and many of his colleagues felt compelled to support its passage.

For decades, a disproportionate number of state and local governments, pandering to a conservative public sentiment, have bought into conservative strategist Grover Norquist’s infamous notion that the duty of public officials is to shrink government down to a size that it can be drowned in a bathtub. Now, in a pandemic era that has clearly demonstrated the importance of big-spending, rational, effective governance, the public’s thinking on this has shifted dramatically. Increasingly, so too has that of U.S. political leadership. Assuming the infrastructure bill does indeed soon pass into law, it could provide city, state and federal leaders a unique opportunity to show residents that, when the funds are made available, government can actually deliver projects and programs that improve people’s lives in tangible, easy-to-understand ways.
-------------------------------------
Can we share something heartbreaking?

Only a tiny percent of the people who read Truthout ever donate 😞 But we’re a nonprofit, and we rely on donations to keep the lights on and our site online.

Whether you’re a longtime supporter or you’re new to our community, if there’s anything you can do to help us raise the $32,000 we need to keep this platform for independent news running, we’d be so grateful for your support.

Copyright © Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.

Sasha Abramsky ... Sasha Abramsky is a freelance journalist and a part-time lecturer at the University of California at Davis. His work has appeared in numerous publications, including The Nation, The Atlantic Monthly, New York Magazine, The Village Voice and Rolling Stone. He also writes a weekly political column. Originally from England, with a bachelors in politics, philosophy and economics from Oxford University and a master’s degree from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, he now lives in Sacramento, California, with his wife, daughter and son.

MORE BY THIS AUTHOR…

RELATED Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pennsylvania), Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-New Jersey), Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia), and Rep. Fred Upton (R-Michigan) talk before the Problem Solvers Caucus news conference on the Infrastructure Deal in front of the U.S. Capitol Building on Friday, July 30, 2021.

NEWS POLITICS & ELECTIONS Centrists Threaten Congress’s Only Climate Bill as Earth Records Hottest Month The $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill contains some of the only climate provisions with any chance of passing Congress. by Sharon Zhang, Truthout August 16, 2021

President Joe Biden attends a virtual meeting with governors, mayors and local officials on the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in the South Court Auditorium of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington, D.C., on August 11, 2021.

INTERVIEW POLITICS & ELECTIONS

Chomsky: Biden’s “Radical” Proposals Are Minimum Measures to Avoid Catastrophe An ever-growing military budget and continued support for oil and gas meanwhile push us inexorably toward doomsday. by C.J. Polychroniou, Truthout August 12, 2021

Mitch Mcconnell OP-ED POLITICS & ELECTIONS On $3.5 Trillion Package, McConnell Meets Defeat — But the Fight’s Not Over The Senate’s passage of the reconciliation bill is a hopeful sign for a desperate country. by William Rivers Pitt, Truthout August 11, 2021

READING LIST

POLITICS & ELECTIONS If California Governor Is Replaced With Republican, Senate Could Swing to GOP

ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH Tech “Solutions” Are Pushed by Fossil Fuel Industry to Delay Real Climate Action

POLITICS & ELECTIONS Biden Can Avoid Being Defined by Afghanistan If He Learns the Lessons of History

ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH As Cases Surge, CDC Only Tracking a Fraction of Breakthrough COVID-19 Infections

ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH It’s Not Just Manchin: Top House Energy Democrat Also Has Fossil Fuel Conflicts

POLITICS & ELECTIONS A Georgia Law Allows Certain Candidates to Collect Unlimited Campaign Cash
SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.