image missing
Date: 2024-04-29 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00020913

Afghanistan
Abny Lessons?

Preparations for the “Next Afghanistan” Have Already Begun

Burgess COMMENTARY
I did some work for the UN in connection with planning Reconstruction and Development in Afghanistan after the Soviet departure in the early 1990s. Our work was headed up by Winston Prattley, with a huge experience within the United Batons. Sadly, the United States under President George H.W. Bush (41) nixed this work opting for a 'Peace Dividend' arising from the collapse of the Soviet Union. So, instead of a positive program of development assistance, the stage was set for increasingly virulent groups in Afghanistan opposed to mainstream Western values.to establish themselves and their training camps in Afghanistan. The cost of our emerging UN plan from the early 1990s was very modest compared to what has actually happened over the past many decades. The US ... and the Western leaning international community as a whole ... has failed catastrophically despite massive expenditures and loss of life. Worse, those with power and influence do not seem to have much intention to learn what is needed to avoid future development failures, starting off with the current crisis in Afghanistan. A better world is possible ... but a different approach needs to be used ... one that does not put the military in the lead development and governance role!
Peter Burgess
Original article: http://dollarsandsense.org/blog/2021/08/preparations-for-the-next-afghanistan-have-already-begun.html
Preparations for the “Next Afghanistan” Have Already Begun

Now that the twenty year-long US military expedition to Afghanistan has ended in catastrophe, the US Neocon establishment has already begun preparations for the “Next Afghanistan”. That process begins with blaming Joe Biden and rewriting history.

Thus, Richard Haas (President of the Council on Foreign Relations) writes in Project Syndicate: “Biden was recently asked if he harbored any regrets about his decision to withdraw all US troops from Afghanistan. He replied he did not. He should.” As part of his argument, Mr. Haas scare mongers prospect of a “Taliban domino effect” whereby the Taliban takeover Pakistan.

The New York Times has also been busy playing the blame game and rewriting history. Two days after Kabul fell, its page one story blamed President Biden and suggested something very different was possible: “But in his speech, Mr. Biden spent more time defending his decision to depart Afghanistan than the chaotic way it was carried out.”

In similar vein, another Times story claimed: “In several cities, Afghan security forces put up a strong fight to stop the Taliban advance, with videos showing exchanges of gunfire. But much more prevalent during the Taliban’s offensive were scenes of apparent retreat by government forces left ill-equipped to secure the country after the American withdrawal.”

The reality is President Biden has nothing to apologize for and deserves our collective thanks for a decision that benefits the United States but would never politically benefit him.

The scale and speed of the collapse in Afghanistan after twenty years of nation building and massive military engagement is not a critique of Joe Biden. It is a damning indictment of the national security and foreign policy establishment.

There was never going to be any other way of exit from this misconceived imperial venture. It was something like this or be there forever.

The “Taliban domino theory” and the “Not this way” argument are attempts by the Neocon establishment to deflect their culpability and pave the road for the “Next Afghanistan”.

Expect more of that from those who got us into this mess and kept us there so long. And the most dangerous among those voices are Neocon Democrats and so-called liberal media like The New York Times, as they give political cover and credibility to their more extreme Republican Neocon counter-parts.

The Neocon narrative opportunistically sprinkles the false notion of self-inflicted defeat and humiliation, thereby rewriting history and making us feel better. That is its toxic siren appeal. It triumphed after Vietnam. It is absolutely critical we stop such Neocon narratives taking hold after Afghanistan or we will be condemned to a future of more of the same. SHARE THIS: EmailGoogleFacebookRedditLinkedInTwitterPrint LIKE THIS:
SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.