Energy: Electric Power
Resilience

There's No Power Grid Emergency Requiring a Coal Bailout, Regulators Say ... The idea that the power grid is so frail it’s become a national security crisis got little support from FERC commissioners testifying before Congress.

Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess

There's No Power Grid Emergency Requiring a Coal Bailout, Regulators Say The idea that the power grid is so frail it’s become a national security crisis got little support from FERC commissioners testifying before Congress.


Power lines. Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

“FERC does not pick winners and losers in the market,” Federal Energy Regulatory Commissioner Robert Powelson told Congress during an oversight hearing. Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

The top regulators of the nation's power grid told Congress on Tuesday that they see no immediate national security emergency to justify propping up coal and nuclear power plants with a government order, as the Trump administration is considering.

All five members of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC, weighed in at a hearing of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on a debate that has been roiling the industry and its regulators for months. It was the first time in many years that the whole commission had appeared before the committee together.

Even though most of them were appointed by President Donald Trump, they seemed ambivalent or even hostile to his repeated attempts, along with Energy Secretary Rick Perry, to require grid operators to buy power from uneconomical coal and nuclear power plants.

Trump political supporters and influential fossil fuel companies, including the coal company Murray Energy and utility FirstEnergy, have pushed for a government-ordered bailout, while a diverse mix of environmental advocates, major grid operators and some public utility companies and natural gas suppliers have argued strongly against it.

The administration wants to keep coal and nuclear generators from being driven out of business by cheaper natural gas or carbon-free wind and solar. A few months ago, FERC rebuffed Perry's attempt to subsidize plant operators who keep 90 days of fuel on hand. Now, the White House has told Perry to use his own emergency powers under two laws to bail the industry out on grounds that plant closures are presenting a national security emergency.

But the idea that the grid is currently so frail as to present an urgent military crisis has received little support, and next to none at the commission.

FERC's chairman, Kevin McIntyre, reading a formal statement aloud, spoke of the deliberative approach the commission has adopted: opening a docket to solicit the views of all parties, especially the grid operators with the fingertip control of electricity supply. To Trump and his allies, this is bureaucratese for kicking the can down the road and risks providing too little assistance too late.

Vigilance, but No Rush to Intervene

Commissioner Neil Chatterjee, a Kentucky native and former energy advisor to pro-coal Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), was the most receptive to some kind of action, if not on an emergency basis.

'In my view, 'no action' is like driving your car without a seat belt,' he said.

Other commissioners echoed Chatterjee's call for 'vigilance.' But while they said it was important to keep the grid resilient during storms, heat waves, cold snaps or market upheavals, they looked askance at emergency federal intervention that would favor one fuel or another.

That, said Commissioner Robert Powelson, a former member of Pennsylvania's Public Utility Commission and past president of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, would be 'a real step back' from the benefits that have accrued to competing fuel suppliers and to consumers alike.

It would also retreat from the climate and other environmental benefits from wind and solar, as well as from storage technologies and smart metering that are helping to clean up the grid.

Commissioners Richard Glick, a former official with energy company Iberdrola, and Cheryl LaFleur, a former executive at National Grid USA who was appointed to FERC by President Barack Obama in 2010, were most hostile to the Trump plan.

'We cannot try to stop the natural evolution of this industry by claiming that there is a national security emergency unless there is evidence that suggests that an emergency actually exists,' Glick said.

GOP Senator also Skeptical of Emergency Claim After more than an hour of testimony, Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) asked the question directly:

'Do any of you believe that in the wholesale power markets we are facing an actual national security emergency at the moment?'

'I do not,' said LaFleur, the most outspoken of the commission's opponents of intervention.

'Would anyone answer that with a yes?' Heinrich inquired.

Nobody did.

Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, the committee's chairwoman, also said she was skeptical.

'As with many controversies, with so much at stake in such a heavily regulated industry such as energy, the various interests are locked in,' she noted. 'This is battle, this is mortal conflict for some.'

Murkowski is closely aligned with the oil and gas industry. Its lobbying group, the American Petroleum Institute, has joined renewable energy advocates to strongly oppose the administration's efforts on behalf of coal and nuclear.

'FERC Does Not Pick Winners and Losers'

The committee's ranking Democrat, Maria Cantwell of Washington, said she found the idea of intervening in markets 'mind-boggling.'

The commissioners, in more measured words, seemed to agree with her.

'FERC does not pick winners and losers in the market,' Powelson said. 'Instead we create an environment where the market can pick the winners and losers.' He called it a 'moral hazard' to do otherwise.

'We need to be wary of people using the situation or a potential situation as a way to achieve market changes that they haven't been able to achieve otherwise,' Glick said.
----------------------------------------------------------
Jack Cushman John H. Cushman Jr. Jack Cushman is an editor and reporter for InsideClimate News. Before joining ICN, he worked for 35 years as a writer and editor in Washington, D.C., principally with the Washington bureau of The New York Times. Cushman has written extensively about energy, the environment, industry and military affairs, also covering financial and transportation beats, and editing articles across the full spectrum of national and international policy. He served on the board of governors of the National Press Club and was its president in the year 2000. He is the author of 'Keystone and Beyond: Tar Sands and the National Interest in the Era of Climate Change.'

MOST POPULAR Fishing on the Big Hole River in Montana. Credit: Meera Subramanian Fly-Fishing on Montana's Big Hole River, Signs of Climate Change Are All Around BY MEERA SUBRAMANIAN

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, French President Emmanuel Macron and other leaders agreed to several climate commitments at the G7 summit in Canada. Credit: Steffen Seibert/Government of Germany Six of the G7 Commit to Climate Action. Trump Wouldn’t Even Join Conversation. BY STAFF

China announced it was scaling back some of its solar subsidies. Analysts expect the policies to reduce the amount of solar installed in China, but increase its solar panel sales globally, lowering prices. Credit: Kevin Frayer/Getty Images China’s Dramatic Solar Shift Could Take Sting Out of Trump's Panel Tariffs BY NICHOLAS KUSNETZ

Hurricane Katia in 2011, viewed from the International Space Station. Credit: NASA Hurricane Season 2018: Experts Warn of Super Storms, Call For New Category 6 BY BOB BERWYN

A child holds a cob of corn, a primary source of food for people and livestock, as well as an important source of biofuel energy. Credit: Mohammed Abed/AFP/Getty Images Climate Change Could Lead to Major Crop Failures in World’s Biggest Corn Regions BY GEORGINA GUSTIN

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt. Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images Pruitt Starts Rewriting How EPA Weighs Costs, Benefits of Regulation BY JOHN H. CUSHMAN JR.

In Miami Beach, high tides are creating street flooding problems as sea level rises. It isn't just during hurricanes any more. Credit: Joe Raedle/Getty Images U.S. Coastal Flooding Breaks Records as Sea Level Rises, NOAA Report Shows BY NICHOLAS KUSNETZ

Power plants outside Jacksonville, Florida. Credit: A. Davey/CC-BY-ND-NC-2.0 Few Southeast Cities Have Climate Targets, but That’s Slowly Changing BY JAMES BRUGGERS

Rep. Rob Bishop, a Republican from Utah, informed NRDC he would use his congressional committee to investigate the environmental non-profit. NRDC works in several countries to reduce pollution, fossil fuel use and carbon emissions that affect lives around GOP Congressmen Launch ‘Foreign Agent’ Probe Over NRDC’s China Program BY MARIANNE LAVELLE

The Ohio River has 26 coal-fired power plants along its banks, about one every 38 miles. For decades, a regional commission has overseen standards for water pollution that crosses state lines. Credit: Saul Loeb/Getty Images Ohio River May Lose Its Regional Water Quality Standards, Vote Suggests BY JAMES BRUGGERS

RELATED

Coal piles sit outside the Hunter Power plant operated by PacifiCorp outside Castle Dale, Utah. The plan rejected by regulators would have paid coal-fired utilities extra to keep stock piles of coal on hand. Credit: George Frey/Getty Images U.S. Regulators Reject Trump's 'Multi-Billion-Dollar Bailout' for Coal Plants BY JOHN H. CUSHMAN JR.

Donald Trump gives the 2018 State of the Union Address. Credit: Win McNamee/Getty Images State of the Union: Trump Glorifies Coal, Shuts Eyes to Climate Risks BY JOHN H. CUSHMAN JR.

Mountaintop removal coal mining has had serious ecological impacts in the Appalachians Trump's Repeal of Stream Rule Helps Coal at the Expense of Climate and Species BY NICHOLAS KUSNETZ Trump's Executive Order: More Fossil Fuels, Regardless of Climate Change BY MARIANNE LAVELLE Subscribe to Clean Economy Weekly WANT MORE STORIES LIKE THIS ONE? Contribute To Our Staff