image missing
Date: 2024-04-29 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00014868

Social Media / Data Harvesting
The Facebook Fiasco

Regulating Facebook won’t prevent data breaches

Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess

Regulating Facebook won’t prevent data breaches Facebook already controls how its users’ data can be gathered and shared. It’s university ethics boards that need to join the digital age. Shutterstock After revelations that political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica allegedly appropriated Facebook user data to advise Donald Trump’s 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, many are calling for greater regulation of social media networks, saying a “massive data breach” has occurred. The idea that governments can regulate their way into protecting citizen privacy is appealing, but I believe it misses the mark. What happened with Cambridge Analytica wasn’t a breach or a leak. It was a wild violation of academic research ethics. The story is still developing, but a college researcher has now acknowledged that he harvested Facebook users’ data and gave it to another company. A scholar and his company failed to protect sensitive research data. A university did not do enough to stop him. Regulating Facebook won’t solve these problems. What Kogan did wrong I am a professor of media and information policy at the Quello Center at Michigan State University, and I was one of the first academics to study the internet. The quality and integrity of digital research is of great concern to me. I think the Cambridge Analytica-Facebook incident is a total disaster. I just don’t think it’s a government regulatory failure. Here’s the story, at least what the media has confirmed so far. Aleksandr Kogan is a Cambridge University data scientist and psychology department lecturer. Outside of the university, Kogan also collected and analyzed Facebook user data – presumably with the knowledge of Facebook – for his company Global Science Research. Through online surveys, he was reportedly able to gather sensitive personal information on tens of millions of American Facebook users, including demographic data, private messages, information about their friends and possibly even information about the friends of their friends. Kogan then provided this data to a political consulting firm, Cambridge Analytica. According to the New York Times, the company analyzed that information, aiming to help shape the 2016 Trump campaign’s messages and identify potential Trump voters. That was never his intent, Kogan said in a March 21 BBC radio interview. He reports being “stunned” that his “perfectly legal” research on the happiness and well-being of Facebook users was deployed as a political tool. What Facebook did wrong So did Facebook do something wrong, then? In my opinion, not really. Facebook already has strict guidelines outlining what can and can’t be done with user data, which the researcher appears to have violated by passing the personal data he collected to Cambridge Analytica. When Facebook launched in 2004, it quickly became a goldmine for social researchers. Suddenly, studies that previously relied only on survey data to gather information about individuals could directly observe how people connected to one another, what they liked, and what bound groups together. In the early years, the company took an open and experimental attitude toward this kind of data mining, even teaming up with researchers to study how tweaking certain features of individual’s Facebook pages affected voter turnout, say, or impacted their moods. Those studies, conducted without the informed consent of its participants – Facebook users – were widely criticized by social science researchers. In 2014, Facebook strengthened its existing guidelines on how user data can be gathered, analyzed and used. Today, the company requires an extensive internal review of every request to extract personal data from users for research purposes. In other words, Facebook self-regulated. It may have been lax in enforcing its guidelines, though. The company says that once it learned that Cambridge Analytica had used Kogan’s data set for unauthorized purposes, it insisted that the data be deleted. According to current press reports, Cambridge Analytica did not comply. For a while, it seems, Facebook did nothing to punish the company. I believe this fallout from this scandal – including a Federal Trade Commission investigation – will push Facebook to take enforcement much more seriously. After all, as CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a March 21 Facebook post, the company “made mistakes” and it “has a responsibility to protect” its users. Cambridge Analytica’s Facebook account has now been suspended. And under both U.S. and U.K. law, individuals or firms accused of unauthorized disclosure of personal information can face prosecution. Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix has been suspended over the Facebook scandal. Henry Nicholls/Reuters What academia does wrong For me, what the Cambridge Analytica fiasco exposes is that university ethical review processes are not yet equipped for the digital age. University researchers are bound by strict ethical guidelines. Across the world – particularly in the U.K., with its strong social research traditions – academics who want to study the attitudes or behavior of private individuals must first pass a stringent review process. They must also obtain explicit, informed consent from those who participate in their research. It is impossible for me to imagine that an ethics board at the University of Cambridge would have ever approved of Kogan sharing his data with Cambridge Analytica. Universities around the globe actually encourage faculty to develop entrepreneurial companies, as Kogan did. That helps their research reach beyond campus to foster innovation in business, industry and government. But the norms and rules that protect participants in academic research – such as not sharing identifiable personal data – do not stop at the door of the university. Kogan’s exploits show that professors’ outside jobs may raise conflicts of interest and may have escaped the reach of institutional review. This is an area of academic work-for-hire that universities need to review with an eye toward updating how they enforce research ethics. I’ve briefed institutional review boards at a number of universities, and I can attest that members often don’t understand how the internet has been transforming the way data is created, gathered, analyzed and shared on the internet and social media networks. Frequently, the authorities who grant professors and students permission to conduct their studies are anchored in the standards of medical research, not modern social science. Many schools also generally fail to understand how cutting-edge some academic fields have become. Big data and computational analytics is one of the most innovative scientific fields today. Legitimate, company-approved access to social media user data allows researchers to study some of the most urgent issues of the 21st century, including fake news, political echo chambers and technological trends. So it is not surprising that political campaigns would want to appropriate these research practices. Until they come up with new rules, I fear universities’ lack of digital savvy will remain a threat to online privacy. Facebook Social media Big data Scientific research Data privacy Data mining Social science research Cambridge Analytica Tweet Share Get newsletter You might also like Are you really anonymous online? Your friends on Twitter may give you away Think Facebook can manipulate you? Look out for virtual reality Facebook is killing democracy with its personality profiling data Cambridge Analytica scandal: legitimate researchers using Facebook data could be collateral damage Sign in to comment5 Comments Oldest Newest David Jenkins I think you are way ahead of yourself here, and dont seem to be aware of all the facts. Kogan’s data collection from Facebook was not part of his work at Cambridge University, so your statement “ A university did not do enough to stop him” is way off the mark. What is really happening here is that they are looking for someone to blame. The reality is that it is a fundamental part of FB’s business model to use people’s data in exactly this fashion in order to target advertising. That is how FB makes money and why its stock is valued so highly 13 hours ago Report William H. Dutton Professor of Media and Information Policy, Michigan State University In reply to David Jenkins David, I am not convinced. I do believe that Kogan should not have shared personal data with a political consulting firm - with entity outside his research team. He is not a scapegoat, in my opinion. But I’ll continue to follow this story. So far, what I’ve learned keeps reinforcing the need for researchers who harvest data through FB to protect it. I know FB is the target of most criticism, as you are suggesting, but I respectfully disagree. 11 hours ago Report David Jenkins In reply to William H. Dutton you dont even know that the data he shared was actually personal and not de identified. The data was not collected in association with his research team at the university, but by the company he founded there is a great deal about this whole affair that is not known - it seems very odd to me that this has very suddenly turned into a big multi media campaign which seems to have the sol purpose of pushing blame away from FB and onto certain individuals what has happened here is really just what FB does all the time with everyone’s data - scoop up the data, apply machine learning algorithms to extract patterns, build predictive models on this and target advertising accordingly. 11 hours ago Report Dave Arnold I just wonder what Kogan thought the political consulting company was going to do with the data he provided. Surely he could not be so naive that he thought they were not going to use it for political purposes. 8 hours ago Report Per Kurowski Anyone explain to me: What is the real difference between what a Cambridge Analytica wanted to do with personal information harvested on Facebook, and what Facebook itself can do with that information? Author William H. Dutton Professor of Media and Information Policy, Michigan State University Disclosure statement William H. Dutton has received funding from Merit, Rocket Fiber, Google, the UK's Economic and Social Research Council, and the Institute for Public Policy Research at MSU. He has never been funded by Facebook. Partners Michigan State University Michigan State University provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation US. View all partners Republish this article Republish Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons license.

SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.