Metrics ... GDP
GDP a poor measure of progress, say Davos economists ...

Three leading economists and academics at Davos agree: GDP is a poor way of assessing the health of our economies and we urgently need to find a new measure.

Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess

GDP a poor measure of progress, say Davos economists ...

IMAGE Christine Lagarde in Davos this week Image: REUTERS/Ruben Sprich

Three leading economists and academics at Davos agree: GDP is a poor way of assessing the health of our economies and we urgently need to find a new measure.

Speaking in different sessions, IMF head Christine Lagarde, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, and MIT professor Erik Brynjolfsson stressed that as the world changes, so too should the way we measure progress.

A country’s GDP is an estimate of the total value of goods and services they produce. But even when the concept was first developed back in the late 1930s, the man behind it, Simon Kuznets, warned it was not a suitable measure of a country’s economic development: “He understood that GDP is not a welfare measure, it is not a measure of how well we are all doing. It counts the things that we’re buying and selling, but it’s quite possible for GDP to go in the opposite direction of welfare” Brynjolfsson told participants.

Today, with the changes brought on by the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the measure is even less of a reflection of the things that really matter: “We need a new model for growth. Just as we’re reinventing business, we need to reinvent the way we measure the economy,” the MIT professor added.

Follow World Economic Forum @Davos As we reinvent #business, we also need to reinvent our measures to replace GDP: @erikbryn http://wef.ch/1JrWyZ4 #wef 4:20 AM - 23 Jan 2016 83 83 Retweets 51 51 likes

Speaking in another session, Lagarde made almost exactly the same argument: “We have to go back to GDP, the calculation of productivity, the value of things – in order to assess, and probably change, the way we look at the economy,” she said.

It builds on a point made by Stiglitz earlier in the week: “GDP in the US has gone up every year except 2009, but most Americans are worse off than they were a third of a century ago. The benefits have gone to the very top. At the bottom, real wages adjusted for today are lower than they were 60 years ago. So this is an economic system that is not working for most people,” he said.

Why, some might ask, does this debate even matter to most people? Is it not something for economists and policy-makers to worry about? Not according to Stiglitz: “What we measure informs what we do. And if we’re measuring the wrong thing, we’re going to do the wrong thing.”

To find out more please visit our Beyond GDP series page.

The Annual Meeting took place in Davos from 20 to 23 January, under the theme “Mastering the Fourth Industrial Revolution”. Latest Articles Which countries are best at converting economic growth into well-being? Stéphanie Thomson 28 Jul 2016 Purpose or profit: which would give you more job satisfaction? Rosamond Hutt and Bilal Pervez 28 Jul 2016 Sitting at your desk could be killing you, but there's a solution Kate Kelland 28 Jul 2016 More on the agenda Further reading arrow 984f0b2d46101716e9c621b9fc9e0192e3e5be4e69b301ddf6e866ef4108d8db