image missing
Date: 2024-05-15 Page is: DBtxt003.php txt00005886

Crisis Mapping Kenya’s Election Violence

Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess

← Tactical Tech: Maps for AdvocacyPolicy Briefing: Information in Humanitarian Responses → Crisis Mapping Kenya’s Election Violence

Are citizen journalists playing an increasingly important role in documenting violent conflict and human rights violations? I posed this question during the 2008 Global Voices Summit and answered affirmatively—but without more than a hunch and rather limited anecdotal evidence. Paul Curion took issue and David Sasaki recommended that someone carry out an empirical study.

I appreciated David’s practical recommendation and decided to pursue the project since the topic overlaps with the Conflict Early Warning and Crisis Mapping project I’ve been working on at the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative (HHI). Supported by Humanity United, the project seeks to explore the changing role and impact of information communication technology in crisis early warning and humanitarian response.

Seeing that I was in Nairobi visiting my parents during the election violence, I chose Kenya as a case study to assess the role of citizen journalists in crisis environments as compared to the mainstream media. My colleagues Kate Brodock, Briana Kramer and I used event-data analysis to code reports of violent and peaceful events as documented by about a dozen citizen journalist bloggers between December 27, 2007 and January 27, 2008.

We did the same for mainstream media, ranging from print media (national newspapers) to radio and television programs. I also included the Ushahidi data because I wanted to carry out a three way comparison between mainstream news media, citizen journalism and a dedicated crowdsourcing platform.

We then created a Google Earth layer to visualize the data over time and space. Below is a YouTube video I created of the animation (for slower Internet connections). Here is the Google Earth layer (KMZ). The data can also be visualized on Google Maps here.

Yellow icon = mainstream news reports; Blue icon = citizen journalism blogs; Green icon = Ushahidi reports.

A dynamic time line is also available below. The interactive time line depicts the number of daily reports produced by mainstream news, citizen journalists and Ushahidi over the 30-day period of study.

Our preliminary findings:

  • Mainstream media reported actual death count before citizen journalists; however, on many accounts, mainstream media did not report on incidents leading to actual deaths, i.e., early warning signs;
  • Citizen journalist reports and Ushahidi reports did not overlap geographically with mainstream media reports;
  • Citizen journalists tended to report as soon as violence started, well before mainstream media;
  • The number of comments on citizen journalist blogs increased during the 30-day period, or during particular periods of violence;
  • The comment section was also used as a medium for real-time updating;
  • Many citizen journalist bloggers used real-time updates sent to them via SMS, primarily from rural areas;
  • Citizen journalism reports declined after the launch of Ushahidi;
  • Ushahidi reports document an important number of violent events not reported by the mainstream media and citizen journalists;
  • Contrary to news media and citizen journalist reports, Ushahidi data always had specific location information;
  • Ushahidi reports also covered a wider geographical area than both mainstream news and citizen journalist bloggers.

For further information on our project’s methodology and sources, please see this short powerpoint presentation (PDF) which we have also uploaded on Slideshare. For more on crisis mapping, please see this page. For additional information on the role of digital technology during Kenya’s post election violence, see this narrative-based analysis (PDF) by my two colleagues Josh Goldstein and Juliana Rotich.

We look forward to receiving as much feedback as possible so we can improve our methodology and analysis in future case studies. We’re especially keen to have others interpret the dynamics displayed in the animation above. In the meantime, please contact me if you’d like to join the team and contribute to our next case study, which will be of Georgia.

To cite this research, please use: Meier, Patrick and Kate Brodock (2008). “Crisis Mapping Kenya’s Election Violence: Comparing Mainstream News, Citizen Journalism and Ushahidi.” (Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, HHI, Harvard University: Boston).

Patrick Philippe Meier


Share this: Like this: This entry was posted in Crisis Mapping and tagged Crisis Mapping, Disaster Response, Global Voices, kenya, Ushahidi. Bookmark the permalink. 44 RESPONSES TO CRISIS MAPPING KENYA’S ELECTION VIOLENCE Pingback: Documenting Kenya's Elections using Crisis Mapping Techniques | Ad Your Comment Here
max | October 28, 2008 at 12:53 am | Reply very good! loved your site.
Patrick Philippe Meier | October 28, 2008 at 1:18 am | Reply thanks Max! Pingback: Smart Mobs » Blog Archive » Crisis Mapping Mainstream Media, Citizen Journalism, and Ushanidi during Post Election Violence in Kenya Pingback: Event: International News Coverage in A New Media World « iRevolution Pingback: Africa’s Crossborder Conflicts on Google Earth « iRevolution Pingback: Top 5 iRevolution Posts of 2008 « iRevolution
Dennis King | January 2, 2009 at 7:46 pm | Reply Ushahidi Wins One of Three 2008 USAID Project Awards Happy New Year from the Global Development Commons! We are pleased to introduce you to the three winning projects for the 2008 USAID Development 2.0 Challenge – Child Malnutrition Surveillance and Famine Response, Click Diagnostics, and Ushahidi. We are elated with the caliber of the winners and would like to invite you to join us at the Awards Ceremony on January 8th at the Newseum’s Knight Conference Center. If there is anyone you’d like to share this with, the event is open to the public (as long as people RSVP), and we especially encourage people engaged in social entrepreneurship, international development, technology, bloggers and mainstream media, investors and venture capitalists, university students, and other thought leaders to participate. Please pass this on to the innovators, thinkers, and activists you know who may wish to take advantage of this opportunity. Kind Regards, The Global Development Commons Team Rebecca Askin Global Development Commons, USAID http://www.globaldevelopmentcommons.net DAI direct: 301-771-7666 email: rebecca.askin@gmail.com rebecca_askin@dai.com Connect. Collaborate. Prosper
SITE COUNT Amazing and shiny stats
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved. This material may only be used for limited low profit purposes: e.g. socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and training.