image missing
HOME SN-BRIEFS SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
EFFECTIVE
MANAGEMENT
PROGRESS
PERFORMANCE
PROBLEMS
POSSIBILITIES
STATE
CAPITALS
FLOW
ACTIVITIES
FLOW
ACTORS
PETER
BURGESS
SiteNav SitNav (0) SitNav (1) SitNav (2) SitNav (3) SitNav (4) SitNav (5) SitNav (6) SitNav (7) SitNav (8)
Date: 2022-07-04 Page is: DBtxt001.php txt00021563
THE TRUMP SAGA
JANUARY 6TH

Looks like Jim Jordan does have something to hide, after all. Time for a subpoena?


US Congressman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, questions United States Postal Service Postmaster General Louis DeJoy during a House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing on Legislative Proposals to Put the Postal Service on Sustainable Financial Footing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on February 24, 2021. (Photo by JIM WATSON/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Original article: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/1/10/2073757/--Material-witness-Jim-Jordan-refuses-to-talk-to-Jan-6-committee
Burgess COMMENTARY
I am no fan of Jim Jordan ... I have a lot of difficulty with his history of changing his view of things not based on the facts but based on what is most convenient ... simply put, I don't trust him to do what is good for the country. Perhaps worse, I don't think he understands what is best for the country.
Peter Burgess
Looks like Jim Jordan does have something to hide, after all. Time for a subpoena?

Laura Clawson ... Daily Kos Staff

Monday January 10, 2022 · 9:16 AM EST

No surprise: Rep. Jim Jordan is refusing to talk to the House select committee investigating Jan. 6. Maybe even less of a surprise: His letter announcing that refusal is very, very long and filled with attacks on Democrats (Jordan, wordy? Surely not!) while dodging the reasons the committee might wish to talk to him, such as his conversation or conversations with Donald Trump on the day of the attack.

Jordan had on at least two previous occasions insisted that he had “nothing to hide.” In July, he told CNN’s Manu Raju: “If they call me, I’ve got nothing to hide.” Subsequently, as Rep. Bennie Thompson, the chair of the select committee, noted in his letter asking Jordan to cooperate with the committee, “When you were asked during a Rules Committee hearing on October 20, 2021, whether you would be willing to share with the Select Committee the information you have regarding January 6th and the events leading up to that day, you responded, ‘I've said all along, I have nothing to hide. I've been straightforward all along.’”

Now that the committee has called Jordan’s “I’ve got nothing to hide” bluff, he’s outraged at this “unprecedented and inappropriate demand to examine the basis for a colleague’s decision on a particular matter pending before the House of Representatives.” That is, of course, not what the committee is interested in. Everyone knows that Jordan’s decision to try to block the certification of President Joe Biden’s win was made the moment Biden defeated Trump.

The committee’s questions are about the planning of the events that led to the deadly violence of Jan. 6, about any discussion with the Trump White House of the possibility of pardons for people involved, and about Jordan’s communications with Trump as that violence unfolded. Jordan has claimed he can’t even remember how many times he talked to Trump that day, which is either an outright lie—Donald Trump rules this man’s world, and every conversation must be like a communication with the divine—or a sign that they talked so many times that the committee really needs to know about it.

A committee spokesman responded, “Mr. Jordan has admitted that he spoke directly to President Trump on Jan. 6 and is thus a material witness. Mr. Jordan’s letter to the committee fails to address these facts. Mr. Jordan has previously said that he would cooperate with the committee’s investigation, but it now appears that the Trump team has persuaded him to try to hide the facts and circumstances of Jan. 6.”

Jordan, a former member of the House select committee on Benghazi—an effort the current top Republican in the House admitted was about harming Hillary Clinton’s electoral chances—described the current investigation into an attack on the U.S. Capitol aimed at preventing Congress from certifying a legal election as part of “nonstop investigations and partisan witch hunts.” He also argued at some length that the committee should really be investigating Democrats, who are in his telling solely responsible for security failures. Mysteriously not mentioned are the delays in the deployment of the D.C. National Guard, which is under federal control. To say nothing of the idea that the very real security failures are a more important subject for investigation than the thousands of insurrectionists who stormed the Capitol and the leaders who encouraged them to do so.

The committee has held back from issuing subpoenas to members of Congress, but Thompson has indicated they would consider such a step if required—and Jordan is basically daring them to do it. And the thing is, Jordan thinks extremely highly of his own rhetorical skills. He loves to do his rapid-fire accusation and irrelevant attack thing in committee settings. If he thought he could win an encounter with the committee, he would want it live on television. And if Jordan doesn’t think he can win an encounter with the committee? Boy, he’s hiding some dirt.



The text being discussed is available at

and
SITE COUNT<
Amazing and shiny stats
Blog Counters Reset to zero January 20, 2015
TrueValueMetrics (TVM) is an Open Source / Open Knowledge initiative. It has been funded by family and friends. TVM is a 'big idea' that has the potential to be a game changer. The goal is for it to remain an open access initiative.
WE WANT TO MAINTAIN AN OPEN KNOWLEDGE MODEL
A MODEST DONATION WILL HELP MAKE THAT HAPPEN
The information on this website may only be used for socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and limited low profit purposes
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved.