image missing
HOME SN-BRIEFS SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
EFFECTIVE
MANAGEMENT
PROGRESS
PERFORMANCE
PROBLEMS
POSSIBILITIES
STATE
CAPITALS
FLOW
ACTIVITIES
FLOW
ACTORS
PETER
BURGESS
SiteNav SitNav (0) SitNav (1) SitNav (2) SitNav (3) SitNav (4) SitNav (5) SitNav (6) SitNav (7) SitNav (8)
Date: 2024-04-25 Page is: DBtxt001.php txt00016565

The Trumpe Presidency
Swamp on steroids

Here’s what Barr said — here’s what Mueller wrote: A riveting comparison of Mueller’s report and the AG’s interpretation of it

Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess

---------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.alternet.org/2019/04/mueller-report-listed-10-episodes-of-potential-obstruction-but-barr-cleared-trump-because-of-his-non-corrupt-motives Mueller report listed 10 episodes of potential obstruction — but Barr cleared Trump because of his ‘non-corrupt motives’ William Barr/Screengrab William Barr/Screengrab Attorney General William Barr revealed special counsel Robert Mueller examined 10 instances of possible obstruction of justice by President Donald Trump — but he disagreed with his assessment. Barr said the president entered the White House in an “unprecedented situation,” given the numerous investigation into his possible illegal associations with Russia during the campaign. Barr said he and deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller and oversaw most of his investigation, “disagreed with some of the special counsel’s legal theories.” “The president was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency,” Barr said, “propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks.” Therefore, he said, that amounted to “evidence of noncorrupt motives,” which he believes absolves the president from criminal wrongdoing. Barr said Trump took “no act” to deprive Mueller of documents or witnesses, although he refused to sit for an interview himself, and instead submitted written responses to the special counsel’s questions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.alternet.org/2019/04/heres-what-barr-said-heres-what-mueller-wrote-a-riveting-comparison-of-muellers-report-and-the-ags-interpretation-of-it/ Here’s what Barr said — here’s what Mueller wrote: A riveting comparison of Mueller’s report and the AG’s interpretation of it Here’s what Barr said — here’s what Mueller wrote: A riveting comparison of Mueller’s report and the AG’s interpretation of it MSNBC/Georgetown University written by Alex Henderson April 19, 2019 13 Attorney General William Barr has been facing widespread criticism for his vigorous defense of President Donald Trump during a Thursday morning press conference held the day he released a redacted… Attorney General William Barr has been facing widespread criticism for his vigorous defense of President Donald Trump during a Thursday morning press conference held the day he released a redacted version of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s final report for the Russia investigation. But Barr’s defense of the president didn’t begin on Thursday: after Mueller completed his investigation and gave his report to Barr in March, the attorney general sent a four-page letter to Congress that was favorable enough to Trump for the president to insist that he had been totally vindicated. And in an article for the New York Times, Charlie Savage (known for his reporting on national security and legal matters) offers a detailed Barr/Mueller comparison showing the ways in which the attorney general spun Mueller’s comments in Trump’s favor. In his letter in March, Barr wrote that Mueller “recognized that ‘the evidence does not establish that the president was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference,’ and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the president’s intent with respect to obstruction.” But Mueller’s report, Savage notes, also said that “the evidence does point to a range of other possible personal motives animating the president’s conduct. These include concerns that continued investigation would call into question the legitimacy of his election and potential uncertainty about whether certain events—such as advance notice of WikiLeaks’ release of hacked information or the June 9, 2016 meeting between senior campaign officials and Russians, could be seen as criminal activity by the president, his campaign or his family.” ADVERTISING Savage notes that Barr’s “use of Mr. Mueller’s words turned the special counsel’s meaning on its head: the brief excerpt came from a list of other possible reasons Mr. Trump might have had to corruptly impede the investigation, and which Mr. Barr did not mention.” In his March letter, Barr quoted Mueller’s report as saying that it “did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” According to Barr, that showed that his probe “did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.” But Savage, comparing Mueller’s report and Barr’s interpretation of it, stresses that Barr “took a larger passage in which the Mueller report suggested that the Trump campaign and the Russian government were knowingly dancing together at a distance, and then excerpted a fragment to make it look like a cleaner exoneration.” In his March letter, Barr wrote that Mueller’s report was inconclusive on whether or not Trump’s actions pertaining to the Russia investigation constituted obstruction of justice. Barr wrote that Mueller’s report “sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the special counsel views as ‘difficult issues’ of law and fact concerning whether the president’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.” And according to Savage, Barr took the report’s reference to “difficult issues” out of context. Savage writes, “In fact, Mr. Mueller made clear that the difficulties resided in accusing Mr. Trump of committing a crime; if the facts had exonerated him, he would have been willing to say so.”
written by Travis Gettys / Raw Story
April 18, 2019
The text being discussed is available at
https://www.alternet.org/2019/04/mueller-report-listed-10-episodes-of-potential-obstruction-but-barr-cleared-trump-because-of-his-non-corrupt-motives
and
https://www.alternet.org/2019/04/heres-what-barr-said-heres-what-mueller-wrote-a-riveting-comparison-of-muellers-report-and-the-ags-interpretation-of-it/
SITE COUNT<
Amazing and shiny stats
Blog Counters Reset to zero January 20, 2015
TrueValueMetrics (TVM) is an Open Source / Open Knowledge initiative. It has been funded by family and friends. TVM is a 'big idea' that has the potential to be a game changer. The goal is for it to remain an open access initiative.
WE WANT TO MAINTAIN AN OPEN KNOWLEDGE MODEL
A MODEST DONATION WILL HELP MAKE THAT HAPPEN
The information on this website may only be used for socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and limited low profit purposes
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved.