image missing
HOME SN-BRIEFS SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
EFFECTIVE
MANAGEMENT
PROGRESS
PERFORMANCE
PROBLEMS
POSSIBILITIES
STATE
CAPITALS
FLOW
ACTIVITIES
FLOW
ACTORS
PETER
BURGESS
SiteNav SitNav (0) SitNav (1) SitNav (2) SitNav (3) SitNav (4) SitNav (5) SitNav (6) SitNav (7) SitNav (8)
Date: 2024-04-23 Page is: DBtxt001.php txt00016292

The Socio-Enviro-Economic System
Streams: Carbon

CO2 doesn't know borders, but we are shipping embodied carbon all over the world

Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess
CO2 doesn't know borders, but we are shipping embodied carbon all over the world carbon flows © The carbon loophole in climate policy Brad Plumer looks at the issue of 'outsourced pollution.'

We go on a lot about embodied carbon; it is the main reason we love wood construction so much. We love local materials too, because one is not offshoring the CO2 to China. It is often controversial, but now the New York Times is on it. And by Grabthar’s Hammer, it is like that scene from Galaxy Quest where Jason tells Brandon: “IT’S ALL REAL!” The title for Brad Plumer’s story is You’ve Heard of Outsourced Jobs, but Outsourced Pollution? It’s Real, and Tough to Tally Up.

Plumer points out that the US and Europe have reduced their carbon footprint from manufacturing.

But those efforts look a lot less impressive once you take trade into account. Many wealthy countries have effectively “outsourced” a big chunk of their carbon pollution overseas, by importing more steel, cement and other goods from factories in China and other places, rather than producing it domestically. embodied energy transfers

© The carbon loophole in climate policy

Chinese steel, aluminum and concrete is all made with coal, creating a lot more CO2 than if it was made in the US or Europe, but the Paris agreement only counts emissions within a country’s borders. According to an updated report, The Carbon Loophole in Climate Policy, Plumer writes:

The United States, for its part, remains the world’s leading importer of what the researchers call “embodied carbon.” If the United States were held responsible for all the pollution worldwide that resulted from manufacturing the cars, clothing and other goods that Americans use, the nation’s carbon dioxide emissions would be 14 percent bigger than its domestic-only numbers suggest.

lbc © Living Building Challenge

Plumer notes that the building sector is beginning to think about this, though not very deeply yet. (Some, like the Living Building Challenge, have been thinking about it for a while)

The construction industry is also starting to take an interest in the carbon footprint of the materials it uses. The U.S. Green Building Council, a nonprofit that certifies buildings as “green” under the LEED label, currently encourages environmental disclosures for a variety of building materials like cement or glass. A new round of LEED standards, currently in development, could go even further by urging low-carbon standards.

There are also “Buy Clean” proposals in various states to promote the use of lower carbon sources of materials, but of course, “In California, the cement industry fought hard to be exempted from the rule.”

spec-board © Architype/ A low-carbon diet for green building

This issue may be new to the New York Times, but it is very real; a lot of people are worrying about it, and are doing something about it. My favourite example is the work of Architype, with buildings like the Enterprise Centre, designed to have the lowest embodied energy possible by using local materials. Who needs concrete and steel when you have wood and straw?

Plumer is right that it is tough to tally up the true embodied carbon in materials from different countries. It is also probably not worth the trouble trying to figure it out; wherever they are made, they have a big impact. We have to think about just using less of these materials with high embodied carbon, rather than just finding the cleanest source.

RELATED MATERIAL

See lots more on embodied energy and carbon in related links below. Embodied carbon © Global Efficiency Intelligence Carbon Dioxide Green Building Materials Wood Construction related content on treehugger.com exterior cladding Thatch-covered Enterprise Centre may be the world's greenest building spec-board Does embodied energy really matter in green building? making a car It is time to get serious about the hidden carbon cost in everyday ... Frieze building being demolished Embodied Energy and Green Building: Does it matter? The Elrond Standard Energy efficiency isn’t enough anymore. child builds tent over vent Lessons from the polar vortex: Build resilient and passive carbon smart Architecture 2030 goes after embodied carbon and this is a very big... Ikea greenwich photo Ikea unveils its 'greenest store ever'
Lloyd Alter
September 4, 2018
The text being discussed is available at
https://www.treehugger.com/sustainable-product-design/co2-doesnt-know-borders-we-are-shipping-embodied-carbon-all-over-world.html
and
SITE COUNT<
Amazing and shiny stats
Blog Counters Reset to zero January 20, 2015
TrueValueMetrics (TVM) is an Open Source / Open Knowledge initiative. It has been funded by family and friends. TVM is a 'big idea' that has the potential to be a game changer. The goal is for it to remain an open access initiative.
WE WANT TO MAINTAIN AN OPEN KNOWLEDGE MODEL
A MODEST DONATION WILL HELP MAKE THAT HAPPEN
The information on this website may only be used for socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and limited low profit purposes
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved.