image missing
HOME SN-BRIEFS SYSTEM
OVERVIEW
EFFECTIVE
MANAGEMENT
PROGRESS
PERFORMANCE
PROBLEMS
POSSIBILITIES
STATE
CAPITALS
FLOW
ACTIVITIES
FLOW
ACTORS
PETER
BURGESS
SiteNav SitNav (0) SitNav (1) SitNav (2) SitNav (3) SitNav (4) SitNav (5) SitNav (6) SitNav (7) SitNav (8)
Date: 2024-04-23 Page is: DBtxt001.php txt00006819

Microfinance
Fonkoze

ILO Micro Insurance Innovation Facility - Fonkoze Case - with some commentary

Burgess COMMENTARY

Peter Burgess

Open PDF ... ILO Micro-Insurance Innovation Facility -Fonkoze-Case Gmail Peter Burgess [MFP] Introducing Case Briefs: Highlighting successful innovation 2 messages mifacility@yahoo.com Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:47 AM Reply-To: MicrofinancePractice@yahoogroups.com To: MicrofinancePractice@yahoogroups.com The ILO’s Microinsurance Innovation Facility has launched a new series. The Case Brief series highlights successful innovation stories from the Facility’s grantees. Each brief describes a grantee's experience and lessons learned. The latest case brief features the experience of Fonkoze. Increasingly insurance is being seen as a way to protect low-income people against the worst effects of catastrophes, such as the storms, floods and earthquakes which are regular and devastating for poor Haitians. Yet a chasm exists between the world of multinational reinsurers and the daily life of Haiti’s most vulnerable. Find out how Haiti’s largest microfinance institution was able to bridge this gap in the Case Brief: Fonkoze. Read the full case brief at: www.microinsurancefacility.org/publications/cb5 Check out the other case briefs in the series at: http://www.microinsurancefacility.org/news/2014/february/introducing-case-briefs Please feel free to share the case briefs with others. Best regards, ILO’s Microinsurance Innovation Facility __._,_.___ Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1) WARNING! If you hit REPLY, your message will go to the entire listserve, not just the original author! VISIT YOUR GROUP Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use . __,_._,___ Peter Burgess Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 2:36 PM To: MicrofinancePractice@yahoogroups.com Dear Colleagues A quick read of the Fonkoze Case Study suggests that there are a whole set of issues that are misunderstood about the purpose and practice of microcredit and microinsurance ... and the role of conventional 'for-profit' financial organizations being engaged with the social microfinance sector. Certainly there is no reason for capital markets to be excluded from support for the microfinance sector, but the reason the capital markets are supporting this sector should be that they see the value of 'creating good' rather than merely making goods that someone with money can buy and produce a profit! People who are typically the clients of a microcredit institution like Fonkoze are going to need help from time to time because of natural disaster. The big question is who should 'fund' the recovery that these people need. And then there is a second question. How should the high cost of administration in an emergency recovery situation be funded? In this case study, it seems that the big entities in the financial ecosystem backed out as soon as the need for their help was real and substantial. It seems to me that a rather modest hit to the profits of these institutions took precedence over what Fonkoze and its clients really needed. Remember these names ... big Swiss Re and MiCRO (MIcroinsurance Catastrophe Risk Organization) limited their exposure essentially leaving Fonkoze and its clients stuck with the disaster. This is essentially what the financial sector does all the time, and it is high time they get called on their practices. A long time ago I was the 'risk' manager and CFO of an international company operating in 26 different jurisdictions ... we managed our risk and self insured for most of the hazards that were likely to come up most of the time. However we did carry 're-insurance' for the very big event that we hoped would never happen. This was a win win for my company and for the insurance industry. You cannot use quite the same model with very poor communities that are the typical clients of the social microfinance institutions. Big finance organizations that have a for-profit business model cannot deliver in the poor community world and at the bottom of the pyramid. Extracting profit from the BoP is almost always going to be at an unacceptable cost to the community ... yet these communities need investment in order to progress. Muhammad Yunus is on the right track with the idea of Social Business just as he was with social microcredit. Peter Burgess ____________ Peter Burgess TrueValueMetrics ... Meaningful Metrics for a Smart Society Multi Dimension Impact Accounting http://www.truevaluemetrics.org/DBadmin/DBtxt001.php?vv1=txt20080001 linkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/peterburgess1/ twitter: @truevaluemetric @peterbnyc mobile: 212 744 6469 landline 570 431 4385 email: peterbnyc@gmail.com skype: peterburgessnyc [Quoted text hidden]



The text being discussed is available at
SITE COUNT<
Amazing and shiny stats
Blog Counters Reset to zero January 20, 2015
TrueValueMetrics (TVM) is an Open Source / Open Knowledge initiative. It has been funded by family and friends. TVM is a 'big idea' that has the potential to be a game changer. The goal is for it to remain an open access initiative.
WE WANT TO MAINTAIN AN OPEN KNOWLEDGE MODEL
A MODEST DONATION WILL HELP MAKE THAT HAPPEN
The information on this website may only be used for socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, education and limited low profit purposes
Copyright © 2005-2021 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved.