image missingTrue Value Metrics (TVM)
Meaningful Metrics for a Smart Society
image missing Navigation ... HOME
HOME
CONTEXT
ISSUES
POSSIBILITIES
HOW THE
WORLD
WORKS
ACTIVITIES
SECTORS
STREAMS
STATE
ALL THE
CAPITALS
ACTORS
PEOPLE
ORGANIZATIONS
PRODUCTS
STUFF
CONSUMPTION
PLACE
COMMUNITIES
COUNTRIES
PEOPLE
QUALITY
OF LIFE
NATURE
SOURCE of
all VALUE
ECONOMY
MONEY
LIQUIDITY
TRUEVALUE
DATA at
the CENTER
ABOUT
VISION
STRATEGY
Date: 2019-01-16 Page is: DBtxt001.php L0500-INET


NEW YORK BASED THINK TANK
Institute for New Economic Thinking


INET ... Institute for New Economic Thinking

MEASUREMENT MATTERS
Measure Change in State and you Measure Progress

Institute for New Economic Thinking
300 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10010

The Functions of the Stock Market and the Fallacies of Shareholder Value

JUN 2017 | INNOVATION & INEQUALITY | PUBLIC & PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS | LAWS & PATENTS
Conventional wisdom has it that the primary function of the stock market is to raise cash for companies for the purpose of investing in productive capabilities. The conventional wisdom is wrong. Academic research on sources of corporate finance shows that, compared with other sources of funds, stock markets in advanced countries have been insignificant suppliers of capital for corporations. The purpose of this essay is to build a rigorous and relevant conception of the evolving role of the stock market in the U.S. corporate economy. In fact, the functions of the stock market go well beyond “cash” to include four other functions, which can be summarized as “control,” “creation,” “combination,” and “compensation.” In this paper, I argue, based on historical evidence, that in the growth of the U.S. economy the key function of the stock market was control. Specifically, the stock market enabled the separation of managerial control over the allocation of corporate resources from the ownership of the company’s shares. Yet, assuming that the key function of the stock market is cash, economists known as agency theorists see this separation of control from ownership as the “original sin” of American capitalism, and argue that the evils of managerial control can be overcome by compelling corporate managers as “agents” to maximize the value of corporate shareholders as “principals.”
What is missing from the agency-theory argument is a theory of the value-creating firm, or what I call a “theory of innovative enterprise.” The value-creation process requires three social conditions of innovative enterprise: strategic control, organizational integration, and financial commitment. The functions of the stock market may support the types of strategic control, organizational integration, and financial commitment that can result in the generation of high-quality products at low unit costs—the economic definition of innovative enterprise. It is possible, however, that the functions of the stock market may undermine the types of strategic control, organizational integration, and financial commitment that the innovation process requires.
In this paper, the author provides a brief overview of the role of the control function of the stock market in supporting innovative enterprise in the historical rise to dominance of U.S. managerial capitalism from the early decades of the twentieth century. Then I elaborate the five functions of the stock market—control, cash, creation, combination, and compensation—in terms of the ways in which, from the perspective of the theory of innovative enterprise, each function can support value creation or, alternatively, empower value extraction. I then turn to a discussion of the evolving roles of the five functions of the stock market in major U.S. business corporations over the past century. The concluding section draws on the history of the actual functions of U.S. stock markets to critique the dominant ideology that, for the sake of superior economic performance, a company should be run to “maximize shareholder value” (MSV). I indicate how MSV undermines the social conditions of innovative enterprise: strategic control, organizational integration, and financial commitment.
INET-WP_58-Lazonick-Functions-Fallacies-REVISED-20170720.pdf Open PDF ... INET-WP_58-Lazonick-Functions-Fallacies-REVISED-20170720

Andrew Sheng - Sustainability Requires Caging Godzillas
Introduced by Robert Johnson ... Executive Director INET
'https://youtu.be/K6teTv7XQCM' Open external link

VIDEO New Economic Thinking
Subscribed28K Add to Share More 1,751 views 18 0
Published on Jun 8, 2011
Financial business is creating credit without limit until a crisis occurs. That's the fundamental flaw which caused the current crisis, says Andrew Sheng in this INET interview. He also worries that the destruction of the tropical forest and other threats to the biosphere have the same character of ungovernable excesses until a crisis occurs.
Category People & Blogs License Standard YouTube License
Open external link 'https://youtu.be/K6teTv7XQCM'

The Bear Stearns Bailout, Ten Years Later
Ten years ago, the investment bank Bear Stearns collapsed. Its controversial rescue by the Federal Reserve and JP Morgan Chase marked a prelude to the global financial crisis, which would begin in earnest in September 2008. As part of INET’s look back at the financial crisis, we commissioned this series of reflections on the Bear Stearns bailout, the financialization of debt, and the moral hazard of government bailouts of banks.
Open external link

This Is INET
Open external link

Noam Chomsky on the Populist Groundswell, U.S. Elections, the Future of Humanity, and More
Open external link

The Government as an Entrepreneur
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/videos/the-government-as-entrepreneur Open external link

How Cuba Became a Biopharma Juggernaut
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/how-cuba-became-a-biopharma-juggernaut Open external link

Visions Beyond the Haunted House
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/visions-beyond-the-haunted-house Open external link
What Piketty Missed in Measuring Wealth
Open external link

Inequality in the 21st century: A critical analysis of Piketty’s work by Nadia Garbellini∗ January 28, 2018
Inter alia ' This study argues that the empirical ‘methods and concepts’ adopted by Piketty are not always consistent with those coming from his reference theoretical framework, nor from National Accounts (United Nations, 2009).
'https://truevaluemetrics.org/DBpdfs/Economics/Garbellini-review-of-Piketty-thesis-Jan-2018.pdf' Open PDF ... Garbellini-review-of-Piketty-thesis-Jan-2018
The Male-centric Biases of Economic Models
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/videos/the-male-centric-biases-of-economic-models Open external link
Luigi Pasinetti on Disrupting Neoclassical Hegemony in Economics
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/luigi-pasinetti-on-disrupting-neoclassical-hegemony-in-economics Open external link
The Debt We Don't Talk About
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/videos/the-debt-we-dont-talk-about Open external link
Stock Buybacks Hurt Workers and the Economy. We Should Ban Them.
https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/blog/congress-can-turn-the-republican-tax-cuts-into-new-middle-class-jobs Open external link



The text being discussed is available at

and


TrueValueMetrics (TVM) is an Open Source / Open Knowledge initiative.
It has been funded by family and friends plus donations from well wishers who understand the importance of accountability and getting the management metrics right.
SITE COUNT
Amazing and shiny stats
Blog Counters Reset to zero January 20, 2015

CAVEAT. The information on this website may only be used for socio-enviro-economic performance analysis, personal information, education and limited low profit purposes
Copyright © 2005-2018 Peter Burgess. All rights reserved.