image missingTrue Value Metrics (TVM)
Meaningful Metrics for a Smart Society
image missing
ABOUT: HISTORY: Old webpage about CCSD

About CCSD
Community Centric Sustainable Development
From around 2007
The idea of Community Centric Sustainable Development has been of interest for a long time ... but the structures to implement have never been set up.The fundamental idea of community centric development is central to a society where improving quality of life is the primary aim of economic activities.


HOME
Navigation
ABOUT TVM
Introduction to the TVM system

People at the center of everything

The Basic Concepts of TVM ... in book format


HISTORY
About the old Tr-Ac-Net

About Community Accountancy from 2008

About the TAAME initiative from 2006

Tr-Ac-Net and Members from 2007

Some old text from 2000 to 2008 The old CCSD webpage from around 2006
missing image
Rural roads need to be functional ... they do not need to be built to main road standards, but should be passable in the rainy season.
missing image
This child in Eastern Sudan is severely malnourished. In good times this is a harsh environment, but with conflict the situation is made dramatically worse.
Images like this don't belong in the 21st century ... anywhere!
This is a chronic failure of global leadership, of governance, and the prevailing economic system.
SOCIETY SHOULD BENEFIT FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF HISTORY.
SOCIETY SHOULD BENEFIT FROM THE EXPERIENCE EVERYONE HAS.
PLEASE JOIN
HELP MAKE TR-AC-NET A CATALYST FOR USING KNOWLEDGE TO IMPROVE SOCIETY AND THE WAY RESOURCES ARE USED.

Economics of the Village
The economics of a village are relatively easy to understand based on the actual facts about a specific community. The short slide set shows how the status of the village changes based on external interventions. The origin of this presentation goes back to the 1980s. It was used in this form in 2006:
PDF slideshow about Economics of the Village (Version of December 2006)

Database about community
Tr-Ac-Net has started to build a community database so that relief and development performance at the community level can be measured and tracked. Local people ... the residents of the community ... serve as the key stakeholders in this information and can see, or not see, the impact of initiatives that ought to be having impact at the community level.

The database is emerging slowly ... the conceptual framework exists ... and some preliminary datasets are being compiled. More will come as fast as possible. Stay tuned and watch the database section of the website.

Community Accountancy
It has become more and more apparent that society at the community level has been marginalized by the world's leadership and decision makers, in part because the spreadsheet metrics of the financial and corporate community and GAAP accountancy only considers money value as being of any worth.

While this is patently absurd to any thinking human being, it has been in the mainstream of business school education for many decades, to the exclusion of all metrics that relate to society and the quality of life.

Tr-Ac-Net's response to this situation has been the development of Community Accountancy ... a system based on the underlying concepts of accountancy but embracing not only money expended and money income, but also value consumed and value created. This system makes it possible to look at development performance in a rigorous way ... relating money expended with the net value created.

Every analysis that is done using the money dimensions, can also be done using the value dimensions. The end result of this will be start holding to account those enterprises that make money profits at the expense of society.

It is not going to be comfortable ... but it is important that it is done.

Community Centric Sustainable Development
CCSD ... Community Centric Sustainable Development ... has been the focus of Tr-Ac-Net's thinking about development since the 1980s. Already, it was becoming clear that the focus on country, the government, the big implementing organizations and big projects was failing to achieve what was widely understood to be the underlying goal of relief and development expenditues ... that is, improving the lives of ordinary people where they live and go about their lives.

It has long been said that "all politics is local". But it is even more so that "all life is local".

Experience shows that community progress is constained in many ways, but that many of the constraints can be avoided with modest assistance. A focus on community can help get resources to where they can do the most good. Focus on a project or an organization has the danger that the community value may not be realized.

Some communities are already operating at a level that is limited by the natural circumstances. Constraints cannot easily be mitigated. These communities have a development challenge that requires a lot of thoughtful consideration. Other communities are operating well below what would be possible with modest assistance. By thinking about development at the community level, interventions can be optimised for the circumstances of the community and the relief and development results can be optimised.

With community priorities used as the driver of development initiatives, it should be possible to create a lot more durable value from the use of scarce relief and development resources.
Community information
Tr-Ac-Net is approaching the challenge of making CCSD mainstream by addressing the information dimension of relief and development. Relief and development metrics at the community level can be very clear. Resources used in a community give tangible results and the enduring value can be seen.

While there is a lot of data associated with relief and development ... the World Bank and the UN are among the largest creators of written reports in the world ... but rather little of this can be used in a "management" mode and little has a recognisable community focus.

Big money discussed at conferences that is either never disbursed ... or disbursed in ways that result in little or nothing at the community level can eventually be challenged.

New money that is remitted directly from well wishing donors to beneficiaries that can be identified in the community are inherently transparent, the accounting and accountability is simple and clear, the monitoring and evaluation is meaningful and recognisable ... and donors can see results, and understand better the constraints at the community level that people have to live with.
Community up strategies
There has been a failure of top down strategy, and this has given rise to an enthusiasm about community up strategies. Community up strategies on their own are no more likely to be successful than top down strategies on their own are going to be successful.

The advantage of the community level strategy is that it is far less likely to be highjacked by powerful intermediaries ... but community level strategies on their own have little chance of being adequately productive to be in a position to be globally competitive. Keeping things simple is fine ... but not by eliminating the details that are important for the analysis.

The Tr-Ac-Net strategy of using community data to help understand the performance of the community, and then to understand the potentials of the community and the constraints has the potential to make community up work ... and for the community to benefit from some of the potential arising from valuable top down initiatives.




CAVEAT. The information on this website may only be used for socio-economic performance analysis, personal information and limited low profit purposes
Copyright © 2005-2011 Tr-Ac-Net Inc. Peter Burgess. All rights reserved.